You’re Brewing It Wrong: 10 Experts Rank the Best (and Worst) Ways to Make Coffee


Coffee is personal, and rarely do two people make or take it the same way. You might crave the punch of a dark roast or lean toward something subtle and complex. Some take it iced, espresso-style with a drop of foam or lukewarm with skim milk (please, no). 

Ultimately, the best cup of coffee is the one you enjoy, but making coffee is a matter of chemistry, and some brewing methods objectively extract more nuanced, well-rounded flavors than others.

person pouring coffee into cup

Nearly every coffee pro I consulted was aligned.

Getty Images

So, then, what is the best device or method for brewing? According to the cadre of coffee pros I spoke with, there is a definitive answer. In all, I asked 10 coffee experts, including roasters, cafe owners, educators, barista champions and one former president of the Specialty Coffee Association to rank seven popular methods for brewing coffee.

Watch this: Physical AI vs. Generative AI: Waymo Battles ChatGPT

The contenders (listed alphabetically): AeroPress, automatic drip machine, espresso, French press, K-Cup, moka pot and pour-over.

The best way to brew coffee, according to experts

hand pushing down to release coffee form pour over device

Pour over earned the top spot by a healthy margin.

Hario

While it wasn’t completely unanimous, pour-over was the clear winner for the overall average ranking. The good news is, pour-over is among the least expensive coffee brewing methods available, requiring little more than a handheld kettle or other pouring device and a funnel dripper outfitted with a conical filter that sits on top of the cup or carafe to catch the coffee. (You can certainly spend more money for a serious pour-over kit.) On the other hand, well-executed pour-over coffee can be fussy and isn’t a set-it-and-forget-it kind of method.

Naturally, pour-over is the kind of thing that true coffee aficionados will happily subscribe to, requiring precise timing and temperature, not to mention the patience required to oversee the brew in progress. This can, however, be complicated for those who need to be caffeinated first to care about such details.

Ranked scores: 

(1 = Best and 7 = Worst)

  • Pour-over: 1.625
  • AeroPress: 2.375
  • Espresso: 3.5
  • French press: 3.75
  • Moka pot: 4.625
  • Drip: 4.75
  • K-Cup: 6.625

Another method highly ranked by coffee pros

Person stirring coffee in plastic immersion brewer

AeroPress got high marks from the coffee experts I spoke with.

AeroPress

While pour-over had the highest overall ranking, it wasn’t the only method ranked No. 1 by a pro. AeroPress — an analog method that combines the agitation of pour-over, the immersion of French press and the pressure of espresso — had a couple of acolytes and came safely in second place in the overall ranking.

Marwyn Garcia, owner of Headcount Coffee, ranked it as number one among the available options (though noted that other, less common methods, such as an immersion brewer or coffee siphon, are also worthy adversaries). The steep time of AeroPress is an adjustable variable that allows for personal preference in the brew, and he also emphasized the quality of the beans, noting the importance of any given method. 

“Overall flavor is more dependent on how fresh your coffee is,” he says. “As well as the roast level, as it can require a longer brew time or steep to get the desired result.”

Among those who placed it second after pour-over, Howard also notes that AeroPress has definite upside: “It has great clarity and versatility,” he says, “especially for travel or a quick cup.”

Espresso and French press methods have merit

an espresso shot on a small stainless steel espresso machine in a kitchen

Espresso and French press landed in a virtual tie for third. 

Corin Cesaric/CNET

Espresso and French press also received first-place rankings from certain coffee professionals, and effectively tied for third in terms of confidence among c.

Heather Perry, the CEO of Klatch Coffee, a two-time US barista champion and former president of the Specialty Coffee Association, notes that it’s espresso that is used to measure barista performance. 

“It’s true that you need some specialized equipment and time to get the best results with espresso, but once you’ve got your machine dialed in, the characteristics of great espresso really shine through,” she says. “Wonderful, intense flavor, beautiful crema, and a great aroma too. Sweetness, acidity, and bitterness are all balanced in harmony.”

Those who favored the French press cited its ritualistic nature and its ability to easily make more than one cup. 

“I’m a fan of the French press method because it really captures the relaxed, hands-on ritual of making coffee that I love,” says Bernadette Gerrity, vice president at Café Aroma. “I’ve always preferred old-school brewing methods to new gadgets because you can control everything, from the proportions to the flavor, without any waste,” she says. “It’s really easy to dial in your perfect cup with a French press. Plus, it’s quick, simple and satisfying — just coffee and water, no buttons or special pods needed.”

Shot of espresso in cup with white crema surface.

“It’s true that you need some specialized equipment and time to get the best results with espresso, but once you’ve got your machine dialed in, the characteristics of great espresso really shine through,” said Heather Perry.

Pamela Vachon/CNET

“French press hits all of the marks, and it allows for several cups of coffee at a time, which allows the pot to be enjoyed by others,” says former professional coffee roaster Dave Linari of NewSylum Brewing. “I find the coarse grind of the bean and the coarse filter allow all of the flavors and aromas to come through as the bean intended,” he says. “The filter allows the coffee’s natural oils and fine particles to remain in the cup, which creates a richer texture and taste, and the whole system is a very simple and affordable piece of equipment, which you can use to froth milk as well.”

Why coffee pros love pour-over

Consistency

kalitapourovercoffee-4.jpg

Pour-over brewing encourages control of precise variables, including temperature, flow rate and agitation.

Chris Monroe/CNET

“With pour-over, a slow, deliberate pour allows control of precise variables including temperature, flow rate and agitation,” says Theo Chan, coffee reviewer and managing editor of Coffee Roast, “ensuring even extraction and revealing a coffee’s nuanced sweetness, acidity and aromatics.” (Agitation refers to the water’s ability to circulate among the coffee grounds during the brew.)

“Maximum control over variables equals consistency,” says James McCarthy, coffee roaster and head of education at Colombian coffee brand Devoción, who specifically recommends an origami pour-over dripper. “Since you’re using your own kettle, you can choose the water temperature and vary the flow rate according to preference.”

“For a cup of black coffee, I’d say pour-over is my go-to,” says Joe Howard, co-founder of YAWN Brew. “With a pour-over, you can really highlight the coffee’s unique characteristics of the origins. It’s a clean brew method that gives you good precision of the coffee.”

Suitability for roast preference

coffee beans on scale

One coffee expert I spoke with lauded pour-over for its ability to tease out the delicate flavor of certain roasts.

Basak Gurbuz Derman/Getty Images

Michael Cramer, founder of Lardera Coffee, notes that roast level is also an important factor in determining which method is favored. “I prefer light-roasted beans, and pouring water by hand produces a more uniform extraction, teasing out their intricate flavors and delicate aromas,” he says. “This requires more time and attention than other methods, but if you care about coffee, it’s a worthwhile investment. You’re giving up ease for the sake of consistency and flavor, which seems a trade-off worth making.”

Filter considerations

The type of filter that various methods rely on was also considered in the ranking. “Pour-overs use paper filters that remove oils, resulting in a cleaner and more delicate flavor profile highlighting the intricacies in a coffee while being able to represent any roast level well,” says Megan Biolsi, manager of coffee education and Training at Sightglass Coffee. “They typically require a little fine-tuning to achieve a great cup, but allow for intricate adjustments for those who want to experiment and perfect their morning brew.”

Lesser-favored methods: moka pot, drip machine and K-Cup

Moka pot on top of stove, open but empty

Moka pots have a certain charm, but coffee experts rank this brewing method lower on the list.

Brian Bennett/CNET

While the Moka pot — a stovetop espresso brewing method — and the automatic drip machine both received some middle-of-the-pack votes, the K-Cup was unanimously voted the least favored method by coffee professionals. While Howard generously noted that it was “quick and tidy,” the consensus was that it “sacrifices flavor and texture,” allows no adjustment, and produces unnecessary waste with every cup. 





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


In an era marked by unprecedented technological advance, seismic social change, and deepening global interdependence, South Asia’s most transformative minds and hearts are now part of a ground-breaking and momentous global reckoning of influence.

Drawing from a pool of 1.9 million notables across 195 countries, the Britain‑based Impact Hallmarks©️ has unveiled around 183 finalists for its international opinion poll for the Quarticentennial Merited Impacts Gazette (2000–2025), a landmark initiative aimed at documenting those whose work has reshaped the first quarter of 21st century through measurable, enduring impact rather than transient fame. The public voting phase is currently live online, inviting citizens worldwide to decide not by visibility, but by the depth of contribution across humanitarian, scientific, ecological, and socio‑economic domains.

Covering a vast forefront of the South Asia’s cohort are Indian icons, individuals whose lives have become templates for systemic change and human dignity in our time. Nobel Laureate Kailash Satyarthi stands as a towering figure among child rights advocates globally, his relentless campaigns over decades contributing to the rescue of millions of children from exploitation, smuggling,  denial of education and prostitution. With a moral compass that has influenced international policy and grassroots rescue operations alike, his work epitomises an India‑rooted but globally relevant struggle for human freedom.

Alongside Satyarthi, Arunima Sinha embodies an extraordinary narrative of resilience and possibility. Having become the first female amputee to climb Mount Everest, she rewrote parameters of physical endurance and transformed personal triumph into advocacy for disability rights and empowerment. Her climb was not merely a physical conquest but a symbolic reorientation of societal assumptions about ability, courage, and perseverance.

Also representing India in the roster of global finalists are innovators whose work bridges scientific ingenuity with human welfare. Nitesh Kumar Jangir, recognised for developing affordable, life‑saving neonatal medical technologies, stands at the intersection of humanitarian impact and technological innovation, directly improving outcomes for countless families who previously lacked access to vital medical care. Dr Fathima Benazir J., a molecular biologist whose work is cited for enhancing laboratory safety and practical applications in child health, further highlights how Indian scientific contribution is yielding direct benefits to society at large.

Among the Pakistani finalists, the narrative of impact is equally rich and systemic. Dr Amjad Saqib, founder of the Akhuwat Foundation, has pioneered one of the world’s largest interest‑free microfinance networks, steering millions out of poverty with respect for dignity and solidarity. His model of Mawakhat — social brotherhood — blends economic inclusion with community empowerment. Prof Dr Aurangzeb Hafi, the arch-polymath of 21st century, a living legend of intellectual realms whose cross‑disciplinary research-work spans over 93 subjects fields and epistemological orbits including Cosmology, Primordiology, Public Health and Phygital Education, is recognised for research contributions that redefine how science interfaces with society and nature. His major contributions include identification of the phenomenon of subsoil hydro-toxification of underground water reserves due to the prevailing sewage-drainage systems. Other accomplishments include the breakthrough discovery of Magneto-Hydro-Tropism (MHT) and Deca-archic Model of Phygital Literacy. He also led ‘Child Retardation Risk Assessment’ programme in the aftermath of Asian Tsunami of 2004. He was, subsequently nominated for Noble Prize, which he declined on ethico-moral basis. His major area of research is prevention of multiple disabilities at pre-birth stage and in the newly born babies. Other Pakistani voices in the poll include community leaders and youth activists such as Parveen Saeed, and young campaigners Ghulam Bisher Hafi and Ubaida Al Fiddhah Hafiah, whose “Voice for the Voiceless” initiative spotlights the plight of children in conflict zones. The legacy of service from icons like Bilquis Edhi and Dr Ruth Pfau — whose decades of compassionate work continue to inspire public health and welfare efforts — is also honoured in the merit index.

Figures from Sri Lanka bring forward narratives of depth and bridge‑building: Dr Jehan Perera, a veteran peacebuilder and human rights advocate, has over decades worked to cultivate inter‑ethnic and inter‑faith reconciliation, embedding social cohesion in communities once fractured by conflict. Prof Chandra Wickramasinghe has propelled Sri Lanka into the orbit of foundational scientific debate with his research on cosmic dust and panspermia, inviting humanity to reconsider the universality and origins of life itself — a work resonating across astrophysics, biology, and philosophical inquiry.

Dr Asha de Vos, a marine scientist, has reshaped global understandings of whale populations and marine biodiversity, rooting conservation in empirical evidence and local ecological realities. Dr A.T. Ariyaratne, whose grassroots development movement has uplifted thousands of rural communities through participatory, sustainable practices, completes this quartet of Sri Lankan nominees whose impacts are both local and global.

The South Asian list is further enriched by nominees from Bangladesh and Nepal whose work has shaped socio‑economic and humanitarian landscapes. Prof Yunus of Bangladesh, who stood as an architect of financial inclusion that has transformed rural economies by elevating beggars, through dignity‑based lending.

Pushpa Basnet of Nepal has become a global exemplar in rescuing and educating children of incarcerated parents, demonstrating how systemic compassion can restructure societal norms around justice and care.

Across the full slate of global finalists, other notable figures illustrate the broader thematic span of the poll — from Chen Si in China, whose daily interventions at Nanjing’s Yangtze River Bridge have directly prevented hundreds of suicides through sustained compassion and dialogue, to intellectual giants like Shing‑Tung Yau, whose resolution of deep mathematical problems continues to foundationally shape theoretical physics.

Impact Hallmarks make it very clear that the poll for Quarticentennial Merited Impacts Gazette is not a popularity contest but, just a validation layer for a historic archive of influence measured by tangible contribution.

Designed to serve as the “living ledger of influence” for the first 25 years of the century, the initiative seeks to capture values, priorities and transformative endeavours that have authored the narratives of change, from humanitarian advances to cross‑disciplinary scientific innovation.

As public voting continues through the official portal, global participation will help determine which of these remarkable individuals will be inscribed most indelibly in the record of 21st‑century impact — an era increasingly defined not by celebrity but by sustained, measurable transformation.

Public voting is underway at the official portal: [https://www.impacthallmarks.org/#voting]





Source link