‘Euphoria’ Team Explains Controversial OnlyFans Storyline in Season 3 Premiere | Euphoria, Marcell Rev, Sam Levinson, Television | Celebrity News and Gossip | Entertainment, Photos and Videos


Sam Levinson and Marcell Rév are speaking out.

The Euphoria creator and cinematographer addressed various plot points and film techniques in the newly premiered third season of the hit HBO show, including a controversial storyline involving Sydney Sweeney‘s Cassie doing OnlyFans.

Keep reading to find out more…

In the show, Cassie and Nate (Jacob Elordi) are engaged and preparing for their wedding. The cinematographer discussed scouting their house in an interview with THR.

“An obvious choice would’ve been something modern and very plain and fancy, but we ended up choosing this mid-century home, which is a little tacky, but also stuck in the ‘70s. It’s probably a strange choice, but also it gives us possibilities,” Marcell said.

“OnlyFans has its own aesthetic and how you elevate that aesthetic to the show’s aesthetic is a challenge, I’m not going to lie,” he went on to explain, addressing Cassie’s efforts to bring in extra income for their lifestyle.

“[Cassie] has got her dog house and her little dog ears and the nose, and that has its own humor, but what makes the scene is the fact that her housekeeper is the one filming it,” Sam added of their OnlyFans scenes.

“What we wanted to always find is the other layer of absurdity that we’re able to tie into it so that we’re not too inside of her fantasy or illusion — the gag is to jump out, to break the wall.”

“Some of these scenes we only lit with these ring lights that she would use…. When you’re inside, it’s a beautiful, glowing front light, but then you jump out of it and it’s just a pool of light and everything surrounding it is dark. It’s just gnarly and jarring. We wanted to capture what she’s trying to show the audience and be inside of it, but then also pull back wider and see how depressing it is,” Sam noted.

“Shooting it on a 65mm camera with our lenses on our film stock — it gives it a certain look, and I think that’s an interesting pairing there. Doing an OnlyFans aesthetic with these tools is something that excites me,” Marcell added.

If you missed it, a teaser glimpse of one of Cassie’s OF scenes sparked outrage as she was dressed like a baby.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Meta has agreed to “substantially reduce” its use of the PG-13 ratings system in relation to its Teen Accounts on Instagram starting April 15.

Last year, the Motion Picture Association objected to Meta directly referencing its movie content rating, which cautions parents against letting their pre-teens engage with certain media. In a cease-and-desist letter seen by  at the time, the MPA said that Meta claiming its were comparable to PG-13 ratings was “literally false and highly misleading.”

The MPA argued that its guidelines for the established movie-ratings system and Meta’s own explanation of the revamped accounts for minors did not align, and that drawing a link could have a detrimental effect on the MPA’s public image by association. It also said that Meta’s system seemingly relies heavily on AI to determine what younger users see on the social media platform.

When introducing the changes in 2025, Meta said that the risk of seeing “suggestive content” or hearing certain language in a movie rated 13+ was a good way of framing something similar happening on an Instagram teen account. It added that it was doing all it could to keep such instances to a minimum.

Meta has now updated that initial blog about the changes after coming to an agreement with the MPA, adding a lengthy disclaimer that reads, in part, “there are lots of differences between social media and movies. We didn’t work with the MPA when updating our content settings, they’re not rating any content on Instagram, and they’re not endorsing or approving our content settings in any way.”

Meta goes on to explain that it drew “inspiration” from the MPA guidance given its familiarity with parents, as well as feedback it had received from parents, and will continue to do so. The difference is that it won’t make the connection so explicitly in its communications going forward.

“Today’s agreement clearly distinguishes the MPA’s film ratings from Instagram’s Teen Account content moderation tools,” said Charles Rivkin, Chairman and CEO of the MPA. “While we welcome efforts to protect kids from content that may not be appropriate for them, this agreement helps ensure that parents do not conflate the two systems – which operate in very different contexts. The MPA is proud of the trust we have built with parents for nearly sixty years with our film rating system, and we will continue to do everything we can to protect that trust.”



Source link