‘Apex’ Review: Charlize Theron Netflix Thriller Avoids Rock Bottom, but Barely


Apex, a new survival thriller from director Baltasar Kormákur, debuts on Netflix Friday. The film stars Charlize Theron as Sasha, a grief-stricken woman who, after a rather predictable accident on a mountain, travels to Australia to find closure. Once there, she finds herself involved in a grueling cat-and-mouse game as she’s hunted by a ruthless local named Ben (played by Taron Egerton).  

There’s a lot the movie could’ve explored during its roughly 90-minute running time, particularly around loss and letting go. Alas, it’s all surface, no depth. It’s a bummer — but at least that surface looks cool.

Let’s back up a minute and discuss the movie’s opening moments. We’re quickly introduced to Sasha, who wakes up in a tent tied to the side of a mountain. This is normal life for her and her husband, Tommy (played by Eric Bana), and it’s understood that the couple does a lot of rock climbing. But Sasha comes to a rock side she just can’t climb over, and, in frustration, they stay on the side of the mountain a bit too long. 

All the while, a snowstorm closes in.

Perhaps I watch too many disaster movies, but the story panned out in a predictable manner from there. Due to a rockslide and bad weather conditions, Tommy gets knocked unconscious (or killed immediately) and Sasha must either let go of his rope or die with him. 

And that’s a wrap for Eric Bana.

Read more: 40 of the Best Movies on Netflix You Should Stream Now

A man in a red puffer jacket and blue helmet stands next to a rock wall.

Eric Bana stars in Apex.

Kane Skennar/Netflix

This opening sequence took place over mere minutes, which, in my opinion, was nowhere near enough time to establish the emotional connection between the two characters that would then inspire her to take a trip alone to the wild backlands of Australia. But we all process grief differently, I guess.

Needless to say, once there, Sasha finds herself in a situation that she wasn’t prepared for. Red flags abound in the form of the cluttered wall of missing persons posters in the local police station and a group of questionable men she soon meets while on her journey to go camping in the unfamiliar terrain.

And this is where Egerton’s seemingly harmless Ben enters the picture. Soon, Apex transforms into something of a horror film, and Ben (along with his trusty crossbow) hunts the American deeper into the woods, because that’s what he does to pass the time.

This is all you really need to know about the story. I’m leaving out some heavy spoilers so you can discover the direction the film takes from there. 

A bald man and woman struggle in white water rapids.

Taron Egerton and Charlize Theron star in Apex.

Kane Skennar/Netflix

It brings me no joy to write a negative review. First off, I am fully aware of how challenging it is to make a movie. Not to mention, Apex was shot entirely on location; Theron and Egerton really ran through the Australian woods and battled in all sorts of terrain, from the side of a mountain to white water rapids. 

Theron did many of her own stunts and trained to believably portray a rock climber, and she definitely delivered on that front. That focus on realism in the field results in a slew of jaw-dropping visuals that beg to be seen on the big screen. But alas, Apex is a streaming release.

Still, this is all commendable, considering how many Netflix titles are produced entirely on sound stages in front of a blue screen, with digital effects added later to build out the story world. But I can’t help feeling that the focus on tactile detail here came at the expense of the emotional depth a story like this needs.

Apex leans heavily on the acting talents of its leads, and Theron and Egerton deliver the goods, no question. Without their strengths opposite each other, I don’t think Apex would be worth the time at all. This may be Theron’s movie, but Egerton steals the show. More on him in a second.

A blonde woman sits in a kayak in the middle of a river.

Charlize Theron stars in Apex.

Kane Skennar/Netflix

When you take a look at Theron’s IMDb page, it’s clear her acting career has been populated with varied roles. She can hold her own in an indie comedy, an arthouse drama, a Marvel blockbuster and even Arrested Development. She brings a haunted stillness to Sasha, which informs the character’s power without spoon-feeding the audience. 

All she needs to do is stand and stare at Egerton and her silence speaks volumes. Without much dialogue, she easily steps into the root-worthy entry point for the viewer to connect with.

Egerton, meanwhile, goes all-in on Ben’s atrociousness. He’s a backwoods Hannibal Lecter, complete with his own unique jerky recipe. It should be mentioned that Egerton is British, doing a semi-believable Australian accent, which is not an easy feat. There’s a grab bag of other terrifying quirks that make Ben frightening, on the same level, at times, as Norman Bates. You can tell Egerton is having a blast playing this character. I had a blast watching him.

Performances can only take things so far, though. Outside of the chemistry between Theron and Egerton, the striking visuals and strong camera work, Apex is pretty hollow. That’s a sad thing to type, considering the notion that this is a story about loss, grief and survival. 

I’m not going to say Apex isn’t worth your time. If you want some empty-calorie terror to get you through the weekend, you can find it here. Just don’t expect much more than that.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


In an era marked by unprecedented technological advance, seismic social change, and deepening global interdependence, South Asia’s most transformative minds and hearts are now part of a ground-breaking and momentous global reckoning of influence.

Drawing from a pool of 1.9 million notables across 195 countries, the Britain‑based Impact Hallmarks©️ has unveiled around 183 finalists for its international opinion poll for the Quarticentennial Merited Impacts Gazette (2000–2025), a landmark initiative aimed at documenting those whose work has reshaped the first quarter of 21st century through measurable, enduring impact rather than transient fame. The public voting phase is currently live online, inviting citizens worldwide to decide not by visibility, but by the depth of contribution across humanitarian, scientific, ecological, and socio‑economic domains.

Covering a vast forefront of the South Asia’s cohort are Indian icons, individuals whose lives have become templates for systemic change and human dignity in our time. Nobel Laureate Kailash Satyarthi stands as a towering figure among child rights advocates globally, his relentless campaigns over decades contributing to the rescue of millions of children from exploitation, smuggling,  denial of education and prostitution. With a moral compass that has influenced international policy and grassroots rescue operations alike, his work epitomises an India‑rooted but globally relevant struggle for human freedom.

Alongside Satyarthi, Arunima Sinha embodies an extraordinary narrative of resilience and possibility. Having become the first female amputee to climb Mount Everest, she rewrote parameters of physical endurance and transformed personal triumph into advocacy for disability rights and empowerment. Her climb was not merely a physical conquest but a symbolic reorientation of societal assumptions about ability, courage, and perseverance.

Also representing India in the roster of global finalists are innovators whose work bridges scientific ingenuity with human welfare. Nitesh Kumar Jangir, recognised for developing affordable, life‑saving neonatal medical technologies, stands at the intersection of humanitarian impact and technological innovation, directly improving outcomes for countless families who previously lacked access to vital medical care. Dr Fathima Benazir J., a molecular biologist whose work is cited for enhancing laboratory safety and practical applications in child health, further highlights how Indian scientific contribution is yielding direct benefits to society at large.

Among the Pakistani finalists, the narrative of impact is equally rich and systemic. Dr Amjad Saqib, founder of the Akhuwat Foundation, has pioneered one of the world’s largest interest‑free microfinance networks, steering millions out of poverty with respect for dignity and solidarity. His model of Mawakhat — social brotherhood — blends economic inclusion with community empowerment. Prof Dr Aurangzeb Hafi, the arch-polymath of 21st century, a living legend of intellectual realms whose cross‑disciplinary research-work spans over 93 subjects fields and epistemological orbits including Cosmology, Primordiology, Public Health and Phygital Education, is recognised for research contributions that redefine how science interfaces with society and nature. His major contributions include identification of the phenomenon of subsoil hydro-toxification of underground water reserves due to the prevailing sewage-drainage systems. Other accomplishments include the breakthrough discovery of Magneto-Hydro-Tropism (MHT) and Deca-archic Model of Phygital Literacy. He also led ‘Child Retardation Risk Assessment’ programme in the aftermath of Asian Tsunami of 2004. He was, subsequently nominated for Noble Prize, which he declined on ethico-moral basis. His major area of research is prevention of multiple disabilities at pre-birth stage and in the newly born babies. Other Pakistani voices in the poll include community leaders and youth activists such as Parveen Saeed, and young campaigners Ghulam Bisher Hafi and Ubaida Al Fiddhah Hafiah, whose “Voice for the Voiceless” initiative spotlights the plight of children in conflict zones. The legacy of service from icons like Bilquis Edhi and Dr Ruth Pfau — whose decades of compassionate work continue to inspire public health and welfare efforts — is also honoured in the merit index.

Figures from Sri Lanka bring forward narratives of depth and bridge‑building: Dr Jehan Perera, a veteran peacebuilder and human rights advocate, has over decades worked to cultivate inter‑ethnic and inter‑faith reconciliation, embedding social cohesion in communities once fractured by conflict. Prof Chandra Wickramasinghe has propelled Sri Lanka into the orbit of foundational scientific debate with his research on cosmic dust and panspermia, inviting humanity to reconsider the universality and origins of life itself — a work resonating across astrophysics, biology, and philosophical inquiry.

Dr Asha de Vos, a marine scientist, has reshaped global understandings of whale populations and marine biodiversity, rooting conservation in empirical evidence and local ecological realities. Dr A.T. Ariyaratne, whose grassroots development movement has uplifted thousands of rural communities through participatory, sustainable practices, completes this quartet of Sri Lankan nominees whose impacts are both local and global.

The South Asian list is further enriched by nominees from Bangladesh and Nepal whose work has shaped socio‑economic and humanitarian landscapes. Prof Yunus of Bangladesh, who stood as an architect of financial inclusion that has transformed rural economies by elevating beggars, through dignity‑based lending.

Pushpa Basnet of Nepal has become a global exemplar in rescuing and educating children of incarcerated parents, demonstrating how systemic compassion can restructure societal norms around justice and care.

Across the full slate of global finalists, other notable figures illustrate the broader thematic span of the poll — from Chen Si in China, whose daily interventions at Nanjing’s Yangtze River Bridge have directly prevented hundreds of suicides through sustained compassion and dialogue, to intellectual giants like Shing‑Tung Yau, whose resolution of deep mathematical problems continues to foundationally shape theoretical physics.

Impact Hallmarks make it very clear that the poll for Quarticentennial Merited Impacts Gazette is not a popularity contest but, just a validation layer for a historic archive of influence measured by tangible contribution.

Designed to serve as the “living ledger of influence” for the first 25 years of the century, the initiative seeks to capture values, priorities and transformative endeavours that have authored the narratives of change, from humanitarian advances to cross‑disciplinary scientific innovation.

As public voting continues through the official portal, global participation will help determine which of these remarkable individuals will be inscribed most indelibly in the record of 21st‑century impact — an era increasingly defined not by celebrity but by sustained, measurable transformation.

Public voting is underway at the official portal: [https://www.impacthallmarks.org/#voting]





Source link