Bride Won’t Apologize to Mom Who ‘Shut Down’ & Tried to Leave Wedding Early. Others Say She’s a ‘Textbook Narcissist’


A stock image of a bride standing next to her mother with their arms linked.
Getty Images / Stock Image

A bride is unsure how to proceed with her mom after some messy interactions in the leadup to her wedding.

Taking to Reddit‘s popular “Am I the A–hole” forum, the 32-year-old woman revealed that she and her husband exchanged vows in “a small wedding” the year prior.

In the leadup to the big day, the bride made multiple efforts to include her mom. However, she said that it went so badly that she eventually gave up. Things were tense, and they only got worse.

Now, the Redditor wrote that her mom’s “been crying to relatives & her friends about how disappointed she is that she wasn’t included.” However, she doesn’t see things the same way and refuses to apologize. Her description led some to speculate that one party is a “textbook narcissist” with “main character syndrome.”

Here’s what happened as they were planning the big day

In her post, the bride explained that her mom “hates social events and weddings specifically.” She explained that she “thinks they’re a ‘waste of money’ and an ‘inconvenience to guests.’ ”

As a result, the mom, who wasn’t paying, wanted her daughter “to elope or have a micro-wedding.”

“After telling her ‘no’ a dozen times, I finally snapped and told her to drop it. After that, she completely shut down and lost interest. I still tried to involve her by inviting her to the florist, dress alterations, offering to go shopping for her MOB outfit but she was always ‘too busy’ or just uninterested,” she recalled.

The bride added, “I even asked her to get ready with me in the bridal suite, but she refused saying she’d rather get ready at home because she ‘didn’t want to socialize.’ She even skipped the rehearsal dinner because she ‘didn’t feel wanted.’ ”

Keep up with more wedding drama here!

After refusing to get ready with her daughter, the mom came to the bridal suite already dressed with her uncle in tow. The bride told her mom that her uncle was not allowed inside, which left her “incredibly offended.”

It only got worse after that.

“Then, immediately after the ceremony, she tried to leave. She actually told my MOH to tell me goodbye because she was just… leaving? It took multiple people convincing her to stay just to take photos and say a proper goodbye. It was a huge, disappointing scene. She missed the reception entirely and of course, this was incredibly noticeable to all of our guests,” the bride recalled.

Over a year after the wedding, the bride said that her mom is “refusing to have a real conversation with me until I apologize for not taking her feelings into consideration.”

“I feel like I spent months begging her to be involved only for her to blow me off, but now she’s acting like it was my fault that she wasn’t involved,” the bride wrote. She noted that she didn’t feel as though she needed to apologize.

The bride was assured that she wasn’t in the wrong

She sought out assurance from fellow Redditors and certainly found it.

“Wow she sounds exhausting. I think she got social feedback that her behavior was messed up and now she wants to rewrite history to make it your fault,” one person wrote. They urged the bride to “tell relatives the real story if you want.”

Others agreed, describing the mom as “a textbook narcissist” and saying that she suffered from “main character syndrome.”

“You didn’t push her anywhere, she stepped out of the planning, the socializing, the festivities…all of it. You tried to include her. Kept inviting her. Not much else you can do without literally forcing her,” one person wrote.

Another agreed, adding, “Whether consciously or not, your mom is getting something out of creating these situations and playing the victim. I don’t know if she’d be receptive, but therapy may help her work that out. Regardless, it’s not something you’re responsible for.”

One Redditor provided a sarcastic recommendation for how to proceed, joking that the bride should write her mom the following message: “I’m sorry you felt left out after you tried to discourage me from having a wedding. I’m sorry you felt left out after I invited you to come with me to the florist/dress shopping/alterations. I’m sorry you felt left out after I invited you to get ready with me without my uncle in tow. I’m sorry you felt so left out at my rehearsal dinner that you uninvited yourself.”

The proposed letter continued. “I’m sorry you felt so left out that you didn’t even want a picture with your daughter on her wedding day. I’m sorry that no matter what I did to try to include you and make you feel special, you felt left out, on a day that was about my husband and I celebrating our love and joining our families.”

“For the record,” they added, “I’m not saying you should apologize to your mother, when she was a big party pooper. Weddings really do have a fun way of bringing out the worst in people.”

The post Bride Won’t Apologize to Mom Who ‘Shut Down’ & Tried to Leave Wedding Early. Others Say She’s a ‘Textbook Narcissist’ appeared first on Just Jared – Celebrity News and Gossip | Entertainment.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


In an era marked by unprecedented technological advance, seismic social change, and deepening global interdependence, South Asia’s most transformative minds and hearts are now part of a ground-breaking and momentous global reckoning of influence.

Drawing from a pool of 1.9 million notables across 195 countries, the Britain‑based Impact Hallmarks©️ has unveiled around 183 finalists for its international opinion poll for the Quarticentennial Merited Impacts Gazette (2000–2025), a landmark initiative aimed at documenting those whose work has reshaped the first quarter of 21st century through measurable, enduring impact rather than transient fame. The public voting phase is currently live online, inviting citizens worldwide to decide not by visibility, but by the depth of contribution across humanitarian, scientific, ecological, and socio‑economic domains.

Covering a vast forefront of the South Asia’s cohort are Indian icons, individuals whose lives have become templates for systemic change and human dignity in our time. Nobel Laureate Kailash Satyarthi stands as a towering figure among child rights advocates globally, his relentless campaigns over decades contributing to the rescue of millions of children from exploitation, smuggling,  denial of education and prostitution. With a moral compass that has influenced international policy and grassroots rescue operations alike, his work epitomises an India‑rooted but globally relevant struggle for human freedom.

Alongside Satyarthi, Arunima Sinha embodies an extraordinary narrative of resilience and possibility. Having become the first female amputee to climb Mount Everest, she rewrote parameters of physical endurance and transformed personal triumph into advocacy for disability rights and empowerment. Her climb was not merely a physical conquest but a symbolic reorientation of societal assumptions about ability, courage, and perseverance.

Also representing India in the roster of global finalists are innovators whose work bridges scientific ingenuity with human welfare. Nitesh Kumar Jangir, recognised for developing affordable, life‑saving neonatal medical technologies, stands at the intersection of humanitarian impact and technological innovation, directly improving outcomes for countless families who previously lacked access to vital medical care. Dr Fathima Benazir J., a molecular biologist whose work is cited for enhancing laboratory safety and practical applications in child health, further highlights how Indian scientific contribution is yielding direct benefits to society at large.

Among the Pakistani finalists, the narrative of impact is equally rich and systemic. Dr Amjad Saqib, founder of the Akhuwat Foundation, has pioneered one of the world’s largest interest‑free microfinance networks, steering millions out of poverty with respect for dignity and solidarity. His model of Mawakhat — social brotherhood — blends economic inclusion with community empowerment. Prof Dr Aurangzeb Hafi, the arch-polymath of 21st century, a living legend of intellectual realms whose cross‑disciplinary research-work spans over 93 subjects fields and epistemological orbits including Cosmology, Primordiology, Public Health and Phygital Education, is recognised for research contributions that redefine how science interfaces with society and nature. His major contributions include identification of the phenomenon of subsoil hydro-toxification of underground water reserves due to the prevailing sewage-drainage systems. Other accomplishments include the breakthrough discovery of Magneto-Hydro-Tropism (MHT) and Deca-archic Model of Phygital Literacy. He also led ‘Child Retardation Risk Assessment’ programme in the aftermath of Asian Tsunami of 2004. He was, subsequently nominated for Noble Prize, which he declined on ethico-moral basis. His major area of research is prevention of multiple disabilities at pre-birth stage and in the newly born babies. Other Pakistani voices in the poll include community leaders and youth activists such as Parveen Saeed, and young campaigners Ghulam Bisher Hafi and Ubaida Al Fiddhah Hafiah, whose “Voice for the Voiceless” initiative spotlights the plight of children in conflict zones. The legacy of service from icons like Bilquis Edhi and Dr Ruth Pfau — whose decades of compassionate work continue to inspire public health and welfare efforts — is also honoured in the merit index.

Figures from Sri Lanka bring forward narratives of depth and bridge‑building: Dr Jehan Perera, a veteran peacebuilder and human rights advocate, has over decades worked to cultivate inter‑ethnic and inter‑faith reconciliation, embedding social cohesion in communities once fractured by conflict. Prof Chandra Wickramasinghe has propelled Sri Lanka into the orbit of foundational scientific debate with his research on cosmic dust and panspermia, inviting humanity to reconsider the universality and origins of life itself — a work resonating across astrophysics, biology, and philosophical inquiry.

Dr Asha de Vos, a marine scientist, has reshaped global understandings of whale populations and marine biodiversity, rooting conservation in empirical evidence and local ecological realities. Dr A.T. Ariyaratne, whose grassroots development movement has uplifted thousands of rural communities through participatory, sustainable practices, completes this quartet of Sri Lankan nominees whose impacts are both local and global.

The South Asian list is further enriched by nominees from Bangladesh and Nepal whose work has shaped socio‑economic and humanitarian landscapes. Prof Yunus of Bangladesh, who stood as an architect of financial inclusion that has transformed rural economies by elevating beggars, through dignity‑based lending.

Pushpa Basnet of Nepal has become a global exemplar in rescuing and educating children of incarcerated parents, demonstrating how systemic compassion can restructure societal norms around justice and care.

Across the full slate of global finalists, other notable figures illustrate the broader thematic span of the poll — from Chen Si in China, whose daily interventions at Nanjing’s Yangtze River Bridge have directly prevented hundreds of suicides through sustained compassion and dialogue, to intellectual giants like Shing‑Tung Yau, whose resolution of deep mathematical problems continues to foundationally shape theoretical physics.

Impact Hallmarks make it very clear that the poll for Quarticentennial Merited Impacts Gazette is not a popularity contest but, just a validation layer for a historic archive of influence measured by tangible contribution.

Designed to serve as the “living ledger of influence” for the first 25 years of the century, the initiative seeks to capture values, priorities and transformative endeavours that have authored the narratives of change, from humanitarian advances to cross‑disciplinary scientific innovation.

As public voting continues through the official portal, global participation will help determine which of these remarkable individuals will be inscribed most indelibly in the record of 21st‑century impact — an era increasingly defined not by celebrity but by sustained, measurable transformation.

Public voting is underway at the official portal: [https://www.impacthallmarks.org/#voting]





Source link