Why the Waterfall Model?

The waterfall model is preferred due to following reasons. They are:

• The Waterfall methodology, as an internal process, places little emphasis on the end user or client involved in a project.
• Its primary goal has always been to assist internal teams in moving more efficiently through project phases, which can be beneficial in the software world.
•  Waterfall model is not suitable for large-scale projects.
• The waterfall model’s requirements should be crystal clear from the start; otherwise, the process may be less effective.
• In large projects, when we are applying a waterfall model, it is challenging to go back and make adjustments in an earlier phase
• In the waterfall model, testing begins after development is finished. As a result, there is a good likelihood that bugs will be discovered as the project develops.

Comparison between Agile vs Waterfall

Following are some of the differences between Agile and Waterfall models:

• Life Cycle: The Agile Model is defined as a continuous iteration life cycle used to create and test software While Waterfall is a linear sequential approach for software development and testing.

• Rigidity: Waterfall approach is a rigid and structured way of developing a software while Agile is a flexible approach to software development.

• Collaboration: Agile is a collaborative approach to software development that produces better results while Waterfall is a less flexible approach that follows a set of steps and prevents collaboration of the team.

• Process: In Agile, the whole development process is split up into sprints while in the Waterfall model, the software development process is divided into various phases.

• Testing: In the Agile model, testing is carried out during the same iteration as programming or development of software. In this approach, the testing team can participate in the requirement modification phase. While in the Waterfall model, testing is done during the development phase. In this approach the testing team finds it challenging to start any modification in needs.

• Focus: Agile Model is solely concerned with developing a simple method for team communication and customer satisfaction. While Waterfall model focuses on the sequence of steps. It consists of two crucial components: products and processes.

• Projects: Agile method is appropriate for the projects where it is anticipated that needs may change and evolve while waterfall method is appropriate for projects with clearly specific requirements and no anticipated changes.

• Customer Satisfaction: By including customers at every stage of the development process, the Agile process places a strong emphasis on customer happiness. While the waterfall model has relatively little customer engagement. It’s because a waterfall model delivers the finished product to the customer after complete development.

• Scope: Agile methodology accepts change, but at the expense of price, timeliness, or other features. It is effective when the scope is understood in advance while waterfall methodology is effective when the scope is understood in advance or when the conditions of the contract prohibit alterations.

• Nature of Execution: In Agile methodology, the requirements may change even after the development process has begun, making the agile paradigm adaptable. Contrarily, the waterfall model is strict since it forbids changing the requirements after the development process has begun.

• Budget: Agile is flexible and welcomes adaptation, experimentation, and changes in course—even in the project’s later stages. The budget is typically more adaptable as a result. While in Agile methodology, the budget is typically established for projects. Since the project is planned out from beginning to end, it is less possible to alter the budget in the middle of it.

• Documentation: Agile projects often require some level of documentation to keep them stable. Agile, however, favours collaboration above documentation as a preferred method of knowledge transfer. While Waterfall approach offers project milestones that make it easy to gauge progress. Consequently, the waterfall project management style places a high value on thorough documentation.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Agile:

The Advantages of the Agile Model are:

• It is a client-focused process. As a result, it ensures that the client is constantly involved at all stages.
• Agile teams are highly motivated and self-organized, so they are more likely to produce better results from development projects.
  The a
• gile software development method ensures that development quality is maintained.
• The procedure is entirely based on incremental progress. As a result, the client and team are aware of what is and is not complete. This lowers the risk of the development process.

The Disadvantages of the Agile Model are:

• Agile necessitates a high level of customer participation, which not all customers are comfortable with or prefer to provide.
• Agile assumes that every team member is completely committed to the project, which undermines the self-management principle.
• A time-boxed iteration may not be enough to accommodate all deliverables, necessitating changes in priority and additional sprints, which may result in delays.
• Agile suggests co-location for effective communication, and it’s not always conceivable.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to get new updates..!

Advantages and Disadvantages of Waterfall:

The Advantages of the Waterfall Model are:

• It is one of the simplest models to manage. Because of the nature of the project, each phase has distinct deliverables and a review process.
• It works well for smaller projects with easily understood requirements.
• Project completion will be completed more quickly.
• Both the process and the results are meticulously documented.
• Method for changing teams that is easily adaptable
• This project management methodology is useful for dealing with dependencies.

The Disadvantages of the Waterfall Model are:

• Structure that is rigid enough to allow for necessary changes
• There is no exemption for uncertainty.
• Customer experience is low, resulting in low satisfaction.
• The sequential approach is not appropriate for a large-scale project with an end result that is too far in the future.
• Only at the end of the project is testing performed.

Limitations of Agile:

The limitations of the agile model are:

• It is an ineffective option for small infrastructure projects.
• Important decisions must be made in the meeting by an expert.
• When compared to other development methodologies, the cost of implementing an agile method is slightly higher.
• If the project manager is unsure of what outcome he or she desires, the project can easily detail.

Limitation of Waterfall Model

The limitations of the waterfall model are:

• It is not a good model for a large project.
• It is a less effective method if the requirement is not clear from the start.
• It is extremely difficult to return to previous phases and make changes.
• After development is completed, the testing process begins. As a result, there is a high likelihood that bugs will be discovered later in development, when they will be costly to fix.

frequently asked Agile Interview Questions and Answers

Conclusion:

Both approaches are adoptable but only based on the customers or clients requirements.After determining the basic methodology to use, one can fine-tune the procedure to best suit our project objectives. Finally, while the manner in which we do our tasks is essential, really what matters is that we produce a solid and sustainable system that fits our customer.

Other Related Article:

1. Agile Prioritization Techniques

2. Agile VS Scrum