New State Fair crop art rules set community abuzz



Crop art

The 2026 crop art season for the Minnesota State Fair competition has begun. This week, the fair announced new rules for the crop art competition, and the artist community is buzzing.

“There are big feelings in crop art,” says Marta Shore, a crop artist and the superintendent for the crop art competition.

Crop art is the very Minnesotan, very time-consuming artform of making mosaics from seeds and plants.

Crop Art Wednesdays (CAW), a monthly crop art gathering at Lake Monster Brewing in St. Paul met Wednesday and the new rules were top of mind.

“When the rules come out, everyone hops on, as soon as that link is live, you're checking to see what's changed, what’s new,” said crop artist Gayle Deutsch.

Many say the most significant change is that quinoa will be banned from the fair competition beginning in 2027. At the heart of crop art is a celebration of Minnesota agriculture, and because Minnesota farmers don’t grow quinoa as a crop, the seed has been banned. It’s a big loss for crop artists because, as Deutsch says, quinoa is prized by crop artists for lettering.

People gather around a wooden table inside a brewery to create crop art.
The Crop Art Wednesdays (CAW) meetup on Wednesday at Lake Monster Brewing in St. Paul.
Alex V. Cipolle | MPR News

“It lays really nice and looks really neat, which is one of your things. You really want to make sure your piece is neat for points, for a ribbon,” Deustch said. “So, that is a little bit of a travesty, but it's okay. At least they gave us warning.”

Deutsch points to the “yellow mustard incident” of 2023, when the fair announced that the seed was banned well after many artists had already started their entries. Many artists start their work in the winter, as the pieces can take months to complete.

“I will say the drama about [quinoa] is much less than yellow mustard,” Deustch said. “People were very upset, because here you have this piece that you're starting, and now all of a sudden you can't submit it, because yellow mustard is illegal.”

The mustard seed ban was actually reversed, but artists think the quinoa ban will stick.

“They gave us a lot of advanced warning, but now I'm going to have to figure out what to do with all of this quinoa that I have,” said crop artist Sarah O’Brien, positing that there will be much more quinoa art this year while the seed is still legal. “Maybe there is going to be more quinoa than I would have thought in my in my pieces.”

Artist Kaela Reinardy says the most significant rule change for 2026 is limiting submissions per person. That number is down to five.

“I think that's a good thing, because I think I'd rather have a limit on number of pieces and have the field smaller than have people not be able to have theirs displayed,” said Reinardy.

People gather around a wooden table inside a brewery to create crop art.
The Crop Art Wednesdays (CAW) meetup on Wednesday at Lake Monster Brewing in St. Paul.
Alex V. Cipolle | MPR News

The crop art competition has exploded in popularity in recent years, said superintendent Shore, and there’s only so much display space in the Agriculture Horticulture Building

“I do like it being in Ag-Hort because, again, that link to crop, the celebrating crops, celebrating agriculture,” said Shore. But, “if someone would like to donate $10 million to build us a crop art building, we would love it.”

Other rule changes include updates to entry categories, deadline dates, sizing and more. Chia seeds have also been banned for 2027, and Shore suspects there maybe more sizing rule changes implemented next year.

Shore, who began in this position in 2024, said the shift is to recommit to the roots of the artform.

“We really want it to be about crops that can be grown in Minnesota,” she said.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Chalk up a win for creative artists against AI companies. On Wednesday, the UK government abandoned its previous position on copyrighted works. It’s currently working on a data bill that, if unaltered, would have allowed AI companies like Google and OpenAI to train models on copyrighted materials without consent. Artists and other copyright holders would only have been offered a mere opt-out clause.

After significant backlash, the UK backed off from that position. “We have listened,” Technology Secretary Liz Kendall said on Wednesday. However, the government’s new stance is, well, not a stance at all. It currently “no longer has a preferred option” about how to handle the issue.

Still, backpedaling from its previous position is viewed as a win for artists. UK Music CEO Tom Kiehl described the decision as “a major victory,” while promising to work with the government on the next steps.

WEST HOLLYWOOD, CALIFORNIA - MARCH 15: (Exclusive Coverage) (L-R) Elton John and Dua Lipa attend Elton John AIDS Foundation's 34th Annual Academy Awards Viewing Party on March 15, 2026 in West Hollywood, California. (Photo by Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for Elton John AIDS Foundation)

Elton John and Dua Lipa spoke out against the government’s previous stance. (Photo by Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for Elton John AIDS Foundation) (Kevin Mazur via Getty Images)

Last year, some of Britain’s highest-profile artists objected to the government’s position. Sir Elton John and Dua Lipa were among those speaking out. Even Sir Paul McCartney weighed in, warning that the AI industry could “rip off” artists and lead to a “loss of creativity.”

“You get young guys, girls, coming up, and they write a beautiful song, and they don’t own it, and they don’t have anything to do with it,” McCartney told the BBC in 2025. “And anyone who wants can just rip it off. The truth is, the money’s going somewhere… somebody’s getting paid.”

The government will now weigh its options, taking “the time needed” to balance the wishes of artists and the tech industry. “We will not introduce reforms to copyright law until we are confident that they will meet our objectives for the economy and UK citizens,” it wrote in a report. “This means protecting the UK’s position as a creative powerhouse, while unlocking the extraordinary potential of AI to grow the economy and improve lives.”

“Any reform must ensure that right holders can be fairly rewarded for the economic value their work creates, and that they are protected against unlawful and unfair use of their work. It must also ensure that AI developers can access high-quality content.”



Source link