Minnesota usurped as national community solar leader



A closeup of the sun reflecting on a solar panel

Maine dethroned Minnesota last year as the national leader in community solar per capita. That's according to a new report from the nonprofit, Institute for Local Self-Reliance.

Community solar is a way for individuals, businesses, nonprofits and other groups to purchase or “subscribe” to renewable energy from a local source.

Ingrid Behrsin is a senior researcher with the Institute for Local Self-Reliance. She said community solar stalled in Minnesota because of two main factors – availability and policy changes.

“It's the reduction in the incentive, and it's also the reduction in the available places where you can plug in a community solar development into the grid," she said.

Before then, Behrsin said Minnesota ran away with a per capita solar capacity nationwide for a decade, until cracks began to show.

Community solar programs aren’t owned by any corporate/private utility companies. So when community solar arrays are built, they take money away from those companies by way of customers switching over to solar.

Solar panels outside
A community solar garden at Prairie Island consists of 10,192 panels divided among 49 rows.
Mathew Holding Eagle III | MPR News

Katie Kienbaum, a senior researcher with the Energy Democracy Institute at the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, said utility companies have a lot of political power. And in many states they hold a lot of sway over legislatures.

“There is just a broad opposition to solar, generally from utilities,” Kienbaum said. “And you'll see that in them opposing or trying to change net metering policies to reduce compensation for solar owners.”

According to Behrsin, it’s similar to what the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission recently did, when it included a cap on the wattage that community solar can offer to its customers. She said that in turn, shut out potential subscribers who were on waitlists, and made financing projects harder and more expensive, especially for smaller developers.

“The best community solar programs don’t have any caps,” Behrsin said. “The second best grow their capacity caps over time. They don’t decrease them.”

She added the uncertainty around when a cap might get hit in any given year can leave developers in limbo.

Behrsin said there will need to be some changes for Minnesota to regain its position as the nation’s community solar leader, but it’s not impossible.

“Utilities and the regulatory commission need to work together,” she said. “To ensure that we can plug as many community solar gardens into the grid as possible, to maximize electricity cost savings for residents, and the reduction in dependency on needing to develop large scale alternative generators that are not distributed solar.”

Last year 42 percent of all installed solar in Minnesota was community solar, tying it at second place in the rankings with New York state.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Lululemon clothing is being investigated for PFAS.Credit: winhorse / Getty Images
Lululemon clothing is being investigated for PFAS.
Credit: winhorse / Getty Images
  • The Texas attorney general is investigating whether Lululemon clothing contains PFAS, commonly known as “forever chemicals.”
  • PFAS are widely used for stain- and water-resistant products, but their long-term health effects are still not fully understood.
  • Experts say exposure from clothing is likely low, but there are some signs to tell if your clothes contain PFAS.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced Monday that his office is launching an investigation into whether clothing from the athleisure brand Lululemon contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), long-lasting compounds commonly referred to as “forever chemicals.” The investigation has thrust these chemicals—linked to a range of negative health outcomes and used in a variety of products—into the spotlight. Here’s what to know about the Lululemon probe, PFAS, and what it could mean for your health if these compounds are lurking in your clothing.

What's the Investigation About, Exactly?

According to a press release from Paxton’s office, the investigation will examine whether Lululemon’s clothing contains PFAS "that their health-conscious customers would not expect based on the brand’s marketing.” The office “will also review the company’s Restricted Substances List, testing protocols, and supply chain practices to determine whether Lululemon’s products comply with its stated safety standards,” the release continued.

Per the release, the allegations stem from "emerging research and consumer concerns."

Lululemon, meanwhile, denied using PFAS in its apparel, which includes leggings, workout tops, and casual athleisure wear. In an email to Health, a company spokesperson said: 

"The company phased out the substance in FY23, which had been used in durable water repellent products, a small percentage of our assortment. The health and safety of our guests is paramount, and our products meet or exceed global regulatory, safety, and quality standards. We require all our vendors to regularly conduct testing for restricted substances, including PFAS, by credible third-party agencies to confirm ongoing compliance.”

What Are PFAS?

PFAS is an umbrella term for a class of chemical compounds used in a wide range of everyday products, including furniture, carpets, paint, food packaging, and clothing. They’re often added to fabrics for their stain-resistant or water-repellant properties, said Alex LeBeau, Ph.D., MPH, CIH, a toxicologist, certified industrial hygienist, and owner of Exposure Consulting in Orlando, Florida.

These compounds—which number in the thousands—have been dubbed “forever chemicals” because they don’t break down easily and have been discovered in soil, air, water, and in animals. They’ve been found in humans, too. Nearly everyone in the U.S. has measurable amounts of PFAS in their blood, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

How Harmful Are PFAS?

Scientists still don’t fully know how PFAS affect human health. The chemicals can be particularly challenging to study because the category includes thousands of compounds, products contain varying levels, and exposure can come from many sources.

Two of the most widely studied PFAS—PFOS and PFOA—were phased out in the U.S. in the 2010s, LeBeau said. Those long-chain PFAS, which tend to accumulate in the body and stick around for longer, were largely replaced with short-chain alternatives, which are thought to be less bioaccumulative but may still raise health concerns.

Much of the research into PFAS has focused on what happens when people ingest them through water or food. A 2025 study found a link between PFAS in drinking water and increased incidence of digestive, endocrine, respiratory, and oral cancers. Still, LeBeau said that overall, “the health impacts are still up for debate in the scientific community.” Many human studies have produced mixed results, and much of the existing research has been conducted in animals.  

While it’s possible for PFAS to be absorbed through the skin from clothing, LeBeau said it’s not considered as concerning as ingesting the chemicals. “Dermal PFAS uptake does not appear to be a concerning PFAS exposure route into the body,” he said. “Limited animal studies have suggested that PFAS may permeate the skin, but skin impact may also depend on the PFAS chemical form.”

How to Know If Your Clothing Contains PFAS

There is no federal law requiring clothing manufacturers to stop using PFAS or disclose whether their products contain them. Although, some states have banned their use in apparel and other products, and many well-known brands have said they are voluntarily phasing them out—including Lululemon. 

While LeBeau said people should be most concerned about PFAS in their food and water, it's understandable to want to avoid potentially harmful chemicals altogether. Unfortunately, it's not always easy to tell whether clothing contains PFAS—but there are a few clues.

One is if a garment is labeled as being made with GORE-TEX or Teflon, both of which are PFAS-based materials. Clothing marketed as moisture-wicking, waterproof or water-repellant, or stain-resistant is also more likely to contain PFAS. It’s also a good sign if a brand explicitly labels a product or line as PFAS-free and that claim has been verified through third-party testing.



Source link