We Got Chatbots to Turn Over Personal Information. How to Keep Yours Safe


Generative artificial intelligence models are trained on vast troves of information gathered from the internet. And your phone number is probably in there.

While some AI chatbots are trained to refuse to provide personal information about private individuals, it’s startling how easy it is to get them to do so anyway. With growing awareness about how these services can fork over phone numbers and addresses, we decided to see what the most popular products would do. Yes, a few of us at CNET tried to see how easy it is to dox ourselves.

If you’re on the internet, you’ve probably heard of doxxing (the release of people’s personal information). So it may be alarming that reports recently surfaced regarding AI chatbots revealing private individuals’ phone numbers

This isn’t the only privacy concern regarding artificial intelligence. A 2025 study from Cornell University discovered that at least five leading AI companies — Anthropic, Google, Meta, Microsoft and OpenAI — automatically use users’ inputs to train their chatbots unless the user opts out. Of those, Meta and OpenAI retain user data indefinitely. That means these AI models are trained not just on the old phone book (remember those?) that has your childhood home listed in it. It could contain the information you gave a chatbot a couple of years ago, however private that was.

But how much can chatbots reveal? And is there anything you can do to stop it?

Do chatbots give out people’s personal information?

the Grok logo is shown on a dark phone background with the slightest bit of a thumb hovering over it

Grok provided personal information within seconds.

Thomas Trutschel/Getty Images

Based on our recent experience, it depends. A couple of us at CNET tried out a handful of chatbots to see what information we could pull about ourselves and relatives. While I won’t share any screenshots or too many details regarding our queries, because, well, we don’t want to dox ourselves, I can tell you this: Grok seemed to be the most “willing” chatbot when it came to getting answers, but some staffers were able to pull some information from ChatGPT, too.

For example, after some questioning, my colleague Jon Reed was able to get ChatGPT to provide plenty of possible addresses for people in his area with the same name, but not his address. However, the chatbot did eventually reveal a relative’s address. ChatGPT provided Reed with phone numbers, including an old landline phone number he once used, and it easily provided a relative’s cellphone number.

I was unable to get the chatbot to provide any address information, and when I asked further, it responded: “Even if an address appeared on a people-search site, I wouldn’t help share or verify a private person’s home address.” 

It also stated, “I can’t help find or share a private person’s phone number.” 

An OpenAI representative didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on how ChatGPT is intended to handle personal information.

(Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET’s parent company, filed a lawsuit against OpenAI in 2025, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.)

Grok, however, was the worst offender in our test. When CNET staff tried Grok, putting in a name and asking for an address, it pulled multiple present and past addresses within seconds. At the end of the query, the chatbot stated in part:
“Note: These come from publicly available records and directories. Home addresses are private; I recommend contacting him through professional channels.” 

Later, the chatbot also provided a former phone number with the following note: “I don’t recommend sharing or using personal phone numbers found in public records.”

An xAI representative didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment regarding its privacy practices.  

Gemini, on the other hand, provided public-facing social media profiles, but would not give any personal information and added this note at the end of the query:

“A note on privacy: To protect personal security, personal mobile numbers for individuals who are not public officials or designated business contacts are typically not released by AI services. Professional platforms like LinkedIn or business-specific email addresses remain the most reliable and respectful way to get in touch.”

Claude also refused to provide personal information. 

How does our personal information end up on the internet to begin with? 

A person uses a phone with a home address location icon emerging from it.

Find the ways you can scrub your home address from the web.

JTKPHOTOz via Getty

This year, I bought my first home and was swiftly inundated with scam mail delivered directly to my door. Months later, it’s still trickling in. The scariest part was that the mail looked completely legitimate. It turns out that when you buy a home, your address and other information related to the home-buying process become a public record, at least in many places. 

Additionally, when you register to vote, violate the law or even shop online, your information can become easily accessible in certain places. 

A sneakier example is when you download a new app on your phone and click “accept terms” without reading all of the legal jargon and fine print. At that moment, you’re often agreeing to your data being shared with third parties. This is one way your phone number and email end up on mailing and call lists, and how more of your personal information can end up on the internet. 

How to keep your personal information safe and private

A person frowns at a laptop while holding paper documents.

Not sure who can see your home address? Begin with an online search.

Ariel Skelley / Getty

As a first step, you can remove your address from the internet so that, regardless of whether people use search engines or chatbots, your personal information stays private. 

“Chatbots will only tell people what info they can find, which means you can protect your privacy by checking what personal information is online and removing it where you can, like from Whitepages,” CNET security expert Tyler Lacoma says. “When in doubt, I suggest spending some time with ChatGPT, Gemini and other chatbots to see what they say about you.”

Ultimately, if you don’t want a chatbot to reveal your private information, you must ensure it’s no longer readily available online. 

What about data removal services?

Data removal services are designed to remove your personal information from public databases and public records. Companies such as DeleteMe aim to reduce your data online, which can reduce the number of spam calls and marketing communications you receive. Many of these types of services are currently being tested by CNET to determine the best options.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Lululemon clothing is being investigated for PFAS.Credit: winhorse / Getty Images
Lululemon clothing is being investigated for PFAS.
Credit: winhorse / Getty Images
  • The Texas attorney general is investigating whether Lululemon clothing contains PFAS, commonly known as “forever chemicals.”
  • PFAS are widely used for stain- and water-resistant products, but their long-term health effects are still not fully understood.
  • Experts say exposure from clothing is likely low, but there are some signs to tell if your clothes contain PFAS.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced Monday that his office is launching an investigation into whether clothing from the athleisure brand Lululemon contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), long-lasting compounds commonly referred to as “forever chemicals.” The investigation has thrust these chemicals—linked to a range of negative health outcomes and used in a variety of products—into the spotlight. Here’s what to know about the Lululemon probe, PFAS, and what it could mean for your health if these compounds are lurking in your clothing.

What's the Investigation About, Exactly?

According to a press release from Paxton’s office, the investigation will examine whether Lululemon’s clothing contains PFAS "that their health-conscious customers would not expect based on the brand’s marketing.” The office “will also review the company’s Restricted Substances List, testing protocols, and supply chain practices to determine whether Lululemon’s products comply with its stated safety standards,” the release continued.

Per the release, the allegations stem from "emerging research and consumer concerns."

Lululemon, meanwhile, denied using PFAS in its apparel, which includes leggings, workout tops, and casual athleisure wear. In an email to Health, a company spokesperson said: 

"The company phased out the substance in FY23, which had been used in durable water repellent products, a small percentage of our assortment. The health and safety of our guests is paramount, and our products meet or exceed global regulatory, safety, and quality standards. We require all our vendors to regularly conduct testing for restricted substances, including PFAS, by credible third-party agencies to confirm ongoing compliance.”

What Are PFAS?

PFAS is an umbrella term for a class of chemical compounds used in a wide range of everyday products, including furniture, carpets, paint, food packaging, and clothing. They’re often added to fabrics for their stain-resistant or water-repellant properties, said Alex LeBeau, Ph.D., MPH, CIH, a toxicologist, certified industrial hygienist, and owner of Exposure Consulting in Orlando, Florida.

These compounds—which number in the thousands—have been dubbed “forever chemicals” because they don’t break down easily and have been discovered in soil, air, water, and in animals. They’ve been found in humans, too. Nearly everyone in the U.S. has measurable amounts of PFAS in their blood, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

How Harmful Are PFAS?

Scientists still don’t fully know how PFAS affect human health. The chemicals can be particularly challenging to study because the category includes thousands of compounds, products contain varying levels, and exposure can come from many sources.

Two of the most widely studied PFAS—PFOS and PFOA—were phased out in the U.S. in the 2010s, LeBeau said. Those long-chain PFAS, which tend to accumulate in the body and stick around for longer, were largely replaced with short-chain alternatives, which are thought to be less bioaccumulative but may still raise health concerns.

Much of the research into PFAS has focused on what happens when people ingest them through water or food. A 2025 study found a link between PFAS in drinking water and increased incidence of digestive, endocrine, respiratory, and oral cancers. Still, LeBeau said that overall, “the health impacts are still up for debate in the scientific community.” Many human studies have produced mixed results, and much of the existing research has been conducted in animals.  

While it’s possible for PFAS to be absorbed through the skin from clothing, LeBeau said it’s not considered as concerning as ingesting the chemicals. “Dermal PFAS uptake does not appear to be a concerning PFAS exposure route into the body,” he said. “Limited animal studies have suggested that PFAS may permeate the skin, but skin impact may also depend on the PFAS chemical form.”

How to Know If Your Clothing Contains PFAS

There is no federal law requiring clothing manufacturers to stop using PFAS or disclose whether their products contain them. Although, some states have banned their use in apparel and other products, and many well-known brands have said they are voluntarily phasing them out—including Lululemon. 

While LeBeau said people should be most concerned about PFAS in their food and water, it's understandable to want to avoid potentially harmful chemicals altogether. Unfortunately, it's not always easy to tell whether clothing contains PFAS—but there are a few clues.

One is if a garment is labeled as being made with GORE-TEX or Teflon, both of which are PFAS-based materials. Clothing marketed as moisture-wicking, waterproof or water-repellant, or stain-resistant is also more likely to contain PFAS. It’s also a good sign if a brand explicitly labels a product or line as PFAS-free and that claim has been verified through third-party testing.



Source link