Minnesota Democrats stage sit-in over gun bill



house chamber doors closed

Minnesota House Democrats staged a sit-in protest Friday in an effort to force a vote on gun restrictions and school safety measures, leaving final action on major aspects of a session-ending deal on hold until the weekend.

About a dozen DFLers remained in the chamber overnight following a failed effort to bring the bill up on Thursday night. They said the protest would continue through Saturday, when the House is set to resume its work on the floor.

The lawmakers said they want to put public pressure on GOP House Speaker Lisa Demuth with just a few days remaining in the legislative session. The proposal passed the DFL-led Senate but hasn’t advanced in the Minnesota House, where there is a 67-67 tie between Republicans and Democrats.

“We're going to go right until the House gavels back in (on Saturday),” Rep. Dave Pinto, DFL-St. Paul, said Friday morning. “That bill's being held back, being hidden somewhere. And so we're going to stay right on through until the House gavels us back in and again, say ‘We want to see the bill and get the bill moving through the process.’”

As Thursday’s session ended, there was a shouting match between DFL and Republican lawmakers, who traded accusations over what was said and posted on social media about their version of events.

Members of the press and public were unable to see the sit-in as the chamber was locked while the House was out of session. DFL members livestreamed their prolonged time on the floor. They discussed their motivation for the action and had gun violence advocates call in to share their support.

Asked about the lack of a vote on the gun measure, Demuth said the bill hadn’t moved through the appropriate committees.

“We have taken bills up already on the same topics, individually within committee, that have failed on a party line vote,” Demuth said Thursday. “We have absolutely taken votes. They just haven't turned in the way that we're hearing some people want.”

Family members of children hurt or killed in an August shooting at Annunciation Catholic Church and School have been a frequent fixture at the Capitol this session and have urged lawmakers to add the gun restrictions.

Rep. Emma Greenman, DFL-Minneapolis said lawmakers need to heed their calls for change.

“The public and these families and these students did their job. They have been sharing their stories for months. They brought their beautiful kids, brought their beautiful voices, to the rotunda to sing and hold us in hope,” Greenman said. “It is time for us to do our job, and what we and our colleagues have said is, ‘We will use all the power we have.’”

It would take a motion to suspend House rules, which requires a two-thirds vote to pass, to enable a quick vote.

At the Capitol on Friday, committee hearings and votes in the Senate were scheduled to continue.

Legislative leaders and Gov. Tim Walz reached a framework to end the legislative session on time. It includes a $1.2 billion public construction projects bill, license tab fee reductions and property tax relief.

It’s not clear whether the sit-in will bog that down.

Rep. Leigh Finke, DFL-St. Paul, said she didn’t expect the protest would interfere with the package of legislation getting through on time.

“The grand bargain is done. It is signed, and I don't expect there to be any reason that this would impact that we are making it very clear what we're asking for,” Finke said. “If there is some interference between this and the business that has been done that will be on the Republican side.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Lululemon clothing is being investigated for PFAS.Credit: winhorse / Getty Images
Lululemon clothing is being investigated for PFAS.
Credit: winhorse / Getty Images
  • The Texas attorney general is investigating whether Lululemon clothing contains PFAS, commonly known as “forever chemicals.”
  • PFAS are widely used for stain- and water-resistant products, but their long-term health effects are still not fully understood.
  • Experts say exposure from clothing is likely low, but there are some signs to tell if your clothes contain PFAS.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced Monday that his office is launching an investigation into whether clothing from the athleisure brand Lululemon contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), long-lasting compounds commonly referred to as “forever chemicals.” The investigation has thrust these chemicals—linked to a range of negative health outcomes and used in a variety of products—into the spotlight. Here’s what to know about the Lululemon probe, PFAS, and what it could mean for your health if these compounds are lurking in your clothing.

What's the Investigation About, Exactly?

According to a press release from Paxton’s office, the investigation will examine whether Lululemon’s clothing contains PFAS "that their health-conscious customers would not expect based on the brand’s marketing.” The office “will also review the company’s Restricted Substances List, testing protocols, and supply chain practices to determine whether Lululemon’s products comply with its stated safety standards,” the release continued.

Per the release, the allegations stem from "emerging research and consumer concerns."

Lululemon, meanwhile, denied using PFAS in its apparel, which includes leggings, workout tops, and casual athleisure wear. In an email to Health, a company spokesperson said: 

"The company phased out the substance in FY23, which had been used in durable water repellent products, a small percentage of our assortment. The health and safety of our guests is paramount, and our products meet or exceed global regulatory, safety, and quality standards. We require all our vendors to regularly conduct testing for restricted substances, including PFAS, by credible third-party agencies to confirm ongoing compliance.”

What Are PFAS?

PFAS is an umbrella term for a class of chemical compounds used in a wide range of everyday products, including furniture, carpets, paint, food packaging, and clothing. They’re often added to fabrics for their stain-resistant or water-repellant properties, said Alex LeBeau, Ph.D., MPH, CIH, a toxicologist, certified industrial hygienist, and owner of Exposure Consulting in Orlando, Florida.

These compounds—which number in the thousands—have been dubbed “forever chemicals” because they don’t break down easily and have been discovered in soil, air, water, and in animals. They’ve been found in humans, too. Nearly everyone in the U.S. has measurable amounts of PFAS in their blood, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

How Harmful Are PFAS?

Scientists still don’t fully know how PFAS affect human health. The chemicals can be particularly challenging to study because the category includes thousands of compounds, products contain varying levels, and exposure can come from many sources.

Two of the most widely studied PFAS—PFOS and PFOA—were phased out in the U.S. in the 2010s, LeBeau said. Those long-chain PFAS, which tend to accumulate in the body and stick around for longer, were largely replaced with short-chain alternatives, which are thought to be less bioaccumulative but may still raise health concerns.

Much of the research into PFAS has focused on what happens when people ingest them through water or food. A 2025 study found a link between PFAS in drinking water and increased incidence of digestive, endocrine, respiratory, and oral cancers. Still, LeBeau said that overall, “the health impacts are still up for debate in the scientific community.” Many human studies have produced mixed results, and much of the existing research has been conducted in animals.  

While it’s possible for PFAS to be absorbed through the skin from clothing, LeBeau said it’s not considered as concerning as ingesting the chemicals. “Dermal PFAS uptake does not appear to be a concerning PFAS exposure route into the body,” he said. “Limited animal studies have suggested that PFAS may permeate the skin, but skin impact may also depend on the PFAS chemical form.”

How to Know If Your Clothing Contains PFAS

There is no federal law requiring clothing manufacturers to stop using PFAS or disclose whether their products contain them. Although, some states have banned their use in apparel and other products, and many well-known brands have said they are voluntarily phasing them out—including Lululemon. 

While LeBeau said people should be most concerned about PFAS in their food and water, it's understandable to want to avoid potentially harmful chemicals altogether. Unfortunately, it's not always easy to tell whether clothing contains PFAS—but there are a few clues.

One is if a garment is labeled as being made with GORE-TEX or Teflon, both of which are PFAS-based materials. Clothing marketed as moisture-wicking, waterproof or water-repellant, or stain-resistant is also more likely to contain PFAS. It’s also a good sign if a brand explicitly labels a product or line as PFAS-free and that claim has been verified through third-party testing.



Source link