Tab fee cut, hospital rescue get OK in session finale



MN State Capitol

Minnesota lawmakers reconvene Monday morning for goodbyes, with the window to pass final bills having closed.

The Legislature concluded a tense session late Sunday by authorizing construction projects, a financial rescue for a safety net hospital, new safeguards against fraud and price breaks for car and home owners.

There was a flurry of activity right up to the end, with lawmakers trying to scoot items across the finish line. A transportation proposal missed the mark in the Senate while the House failed to advance a bill that would set term limits for future governors.

Lawmakers were almost evenly split — 101 DFLers and 100 Republicans.

House DFL Leader Zack Stephenson hailed what did get done.

“We just had an incredibly productive session at a time when I think walking in, most people were not optimistic about that,” Stephenson said early Monday. “A narrowly divided legislature couldn’t be more divided.”

They were dealt challenges outside of their control — from adjusting to new requirements from the federal government for health and food programs to coping with the assassination of their former colleague to an extended federal immigration agent surge. Gun bills roiled the Capitol, too.

“There are lots of disappointments every year. This was a big one, and that’s been festering for so long,” Sen. John Marty, DFL-Roseville, said while sitting beside Sen. Zaynab Mohamed outside the chamber as the clock ticked down.

“Gun violence, Metro Surge, horrific things happening to the community, and the House won’t act on them, and it’s a tied House,” Marty said. “We understand partisan politics, but refusal to vote on her gun violence bill, refusal to allow business relief for the businesses hurt by the surge, there are very few things we’ve won on.”

Mohamed, a Minneapolis Democrat, agreed.

“We've had the opportunity to do more to step up to protect our neighbors, to save programs, and instead we're often choosing between a political headline instead of doing the right thing for people,” Mohamed said.

Emotions were high from the start. Lawmakers mourned former House Speaker Melissa Hortman and the two children killed at Annunciation Catholic Church and School.

Republicans zeroed in on fraud, where some changes to firm up defenses did get made.

They also tried to roll back regulations, mostly without success. Lawmakers spent a lot of time talking past one another.

Rep. Danny Nadeau, R-Rogers, said it often felt like lawmakers were talking past one another.

“Very different views, but all of a sudden we come down here and we stand in one place, but it's almost like we’re back to back,” he said. “So we don’t see what the other person is seeing.”

Legislative leaders said they did the best they could with the political layout. They were also trying to limit spending out of concern a deficit is brewing.

A broad package to close out the session included emergency funding to help prevent the closure of HCMC — the Minneapolis safety-net hospital. A first round of $50 million could help stabilize its finances and another $150 million won’t be far behind.

“These are the people that care for us, and they needed us to step up for them, because that is where people had their babies, maybe on their worst day of their life, they were saved by HCMC,” Rep. Esther Agbaje, DFL-Minneapolis, who championed the proposal.

The deal also included property tax assistance that provides a 15 percent bump to those homeowners who qualify for the homestead tax credit. Drivers could also see some relief from one-year decreases in license tab fees. For the owner of a $25,000 vehicle, the savings is about $72. For a $50,000 vehicle, the renewal cost would fall by about $145.

Senate Minority Leader Mark Johnson, R-East Grand Forks, celebrated those elements.

“We’re able to finally get the tab fees reduced by $254 million,” he said. “That's $254 million that’s going to be staying in Minnesotans’ pockets when they come to renew their tab fees.”

Lawmakers also earmarked money for rental assistance funding and school safety. A new anonymous threat reporting system will be established to head off more school tragedies.

They also renamed a highway and garden in honor of Hortman. And they adopted permanent security upgrades at the Capitol. As well as new protections for lawmakers, judges and other office holders when they’re off the complex.

Republican Rep. Greg Davids said while there have been struggles, the narrowly divided Legislature has fostered positive changes.

“I’ve served in the majority, I’ve served in the minority, and I know how each of those works. I’ve never served in a tie before, and you know what’s been interesting is that it has actually made us sit down with the other side and talk,” Davids said. “That's a good thing.”

Lawmakers return today for retirement speeches. Those running for new terms will turn to campaign mode; candidate filing starts Tuesday.

All 201 legislative seats are on November’s ballot. Both parties hope the tie is broken — as long as they’re the ones on top when the 2027 session starts in January.

MPR News fellow Cait Kelley contributed to this story



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


I was watching a Ford truck commercial—you know, the kind that airs during Monday Night Football—and the theme was how good solid blue-collar Americans who own small welding businesses and wear plaid flannel shirts always give 100%. Cue Bob Seger, “Like a Rock.”

Oh wait, that was Chevy. But you get the idea.

Anyway, Ford has obviously gone soft. Anyone who follows sports or business figures on social media knows that giving 100% is for losers. Winners give 110% every day. I know this from watching Shark Tank and that Michael Jordan documentary.

This idea is not limited to athletes and self-made billionaires. There’s another group that really likes to say that you need to exert the maximum possible effort, stretching yourself to the limit, every time, all the time.

The 110% mentality in law practice

Lawyers, of course. Especially in the BigLaw world. It’s a standard part of the culture.

Just ask that prominent “law-bro” recruiter who’s always giving cringey advice. Or that firm that billed a bazillion hours on the Twitter lawsuit.

I chalk up this 110% rhetoric mainly to marketing. It’s the image law firms want to sell to their clients, and also to their associates. They want clients to think they go all out, all the time, and they want associates to feel guilty when they don’t bill as many hours as humanly possible.

I’ve always been kind of skeptical about this idea. For starters, I just don’t think it’s realistic to demand maximum effort, 25 billable hours a day, for days on end. Anybody who has worked in a law firm knows this just doesn’t really happen.

I mean, we’re talking about practice. Not a game . . .

But lately I’ve been thinking about a different objection to the “always be grinding” mentality in law firm culture: does it actually result in better performance?

I hypothesize that lawyers and other professionals might actually perform at a higher level if they ditch the 110% approach.

To test this hypothesis, I did an experiment.

My scientific experiment

I went to the park to test how far I could kick a soccer ball. But here’s the key: I did it two ways.

First, I thought about kicking the ball as hard as I possibly could.

Second, I relaxed and thought about kicking the ball hard, but not as hard as I could.

To keep it scientific, I repeated the experiment multiple times. I mean, like at least three times.

I don’t even need to tell you what happened.

Yes, of course, I got more distance with the second approach. Maybe not every single time, but definitely most of the time.

The same experiment works with driving a golf ball off the tee. If you play golf at all, you already know this. When you walk up to the tee box thinking “I’m going to smack the crap out of this ball,” the result is almost always bad. Unless you are John Daly. But I digress.

The point is that the experiment illustrates a principle well known to sports psychologists, the “85 Percent Rule.”

The 85 Percent Rule

Here’s what people who coach elite athletes already know. Let’s say you tell a world-class sprinter to run the 100-meter dash at 85% effort. Often that results in a faster time than trying to run at 100% effort.

Now, of course, this isn’t a highly scientific theory, and you can quibble with the details. But that’s not the point.

The point is that athletes often get better results when they don’t try as hard as they possibly can.

What gives? Why is that?

The theory is that when elite athletes concentrate on exerting the maximum possible effort, they tense up, and their performance suffers. When they think about giving 85%, they relax and perform better.

Could the same principle hold true for lawyers, and other professionals?

Anecdotal evidence and my own personal experience suggest the answer may be yes.

Do the most effective lawyers give 110 percent?

Have you ever watched a lawyer in the courtroom who just seems to be trying too hard? It can be hard to watch. They’re going all out to try to persuade the judge or jury to go their way, but instead they just sound desperate, or overly aggressive.

And don’t get me started on law firms over-working a file.

On the other hand, think about the most persuasive lawyers you have seen in action. Did they seem like they were straining to exert themselves as much as humanly possible? Or did they seem relaxed and confident?

You don’t even have to say anything, I already know what the best lawyers are like.

Like a rock.

______________________

Zach Wolfe (zach@zachwolfelaw.com) is a Texas trial lawyer who handles non-compete and trade secret litigation at Zach Wolfe Law Firm (zachwolfelaw.com). Thomson Reuters has named him a Texas Super Lawyer® for Business Litigation every year since 2020.

These are his opinions, not the opinions of his firm or clients, so don’t cite part of this post against him in an actual case. Every case is different, so don’t rely on this post as legal advice for your case.



Source link