Clergy hold 24-hour vigil urging lawmakers to fund HCMC



People gathering for vigil outside HCMC

Dozens of Twin Cities clergy members and supporters gathered outside Hennepin County Medical Center Thursday for a 24-hour prayer vigil, as they urge state lawmakers to fund the hospital.

The hospital is the state’s biggest trauma center, and a major training site for the region’s doctors, but it’s facing financial struggles. The public facility serves many low-income and uninsured patients, and it’s been hit hard by federal cuts to Medicaid and rising costs of uncompensated care. That’s led HCMC to cut some staff and programming.

The hospital is now relying on the Legislature to help it survive.

Minister JaNaé Bates Imari said at the start of the vigil that the state needs to keep HCMC open, in the interest of the patients who struggle to find care elsewhere.

Pastor B. Charvez Russell speaking at vigil
Pastor B. Charvez Russell speaks at the start of a vigil outside HCMC in Minneapolis on April 30.
Estelle Timar-Wilcox | MPR News

“It is a moral responsibility,” Bates Imari said. “It is also just the right thing to do if we want to make sure we have healthy people who live here.”

The state Senate passed a bill this week that includes $150 million in direct grants for HCMC, among other funding for Medicaid and food assistance. It passed on party lines, in a narrow 34-33 vote. The tied house has yet to vote on its own version of the bill. Other proposed legislation would allocate some sales tax funds to HCMC.

B. Charvez Russell is a pastor at Greater Friendship Missionary Baptist Church in south Minneapolis. He said it's important that lawmakers do what they can to keep HCMC open.

“This is about whether we believe health care is a right and not a privilege, and that means that we treat the sick, the poor and the vulnerable just as we do anybody else, because the better the least of these do, the better all of us do,” Russell said.

Organizers of Thursday’s vigil plan to stay outside the building until 10 a.m. Friday. They said they expect hundreds of faith leaders and clergy to participate.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Meta has agreed to “substantially reduce” its use of the PG-13 ratings system in relation to its Teen Accounts on Instagram starting April 15.

Last year, the Motion Picture Association objected to Meta directly referencing its movie content rating, which cautions parents against letting their pre-teens engage with certain media. In a cease-and-desist letter seen by  at the time, the MPA said that Meta claiming its were comparable to PG-13 ratings was “literally false and highly misleading.”

The MPA argued that its guidelines for the established movie-ratings system and Meta’s own explanation of the revamped accounts for minors did not align, and that drawing a link could have a detrimental effect on the MPA’s public image by association. It also said that Meta’s system seemingly relies heavily on AI to determine what younger users see on the social media platform.

When introducing the changes in 2025, Meta said that the risk of seeing “suggestive content” or hearing certain language in a movie rated 13+ was a good way of framing something similar happening on an Instagram teen account. It added that it was doing all it could to keep such instances to a minimum.

Meta has now updated that initial blog about the changes after coming to an agreement with the MPA, adding a lengthy disclaimer that reads, in part, “there are lots of differences between social media and movies. We didn’t work with the MPA when updating our content settings, they’re not rating any content on Instagram, and they’re not endorsing or approving our content settings in any way.”

Meta goes on to explain that it drew “inspiration” from the MPA guidance given its familiarity with parents, as well as feedback it had received from parents, and will continue to do so. The difference is that it won’t make the connection so explicitly in its communications going forward.

“Today’s agreement clearly distinguishes the MPA’s film ratings from Instagram’s Teen Account content moderation tools,” said Charles Rivkin, Chairman and CEO of the MPA. “While we welcome efforts to protect kids from content that may not be appropriate for them, this agreement helps ensure that parents do not conflate the two systems – which operate in very different contexts. The MPA is proud of the trust we have built with parents for nearly sixty years with our film rating system, and we will continue to do everything we can to protect that trust.”



Source link