Data center project unites poles of political spectrum



Woman showing map and poster

Standing outside the state Capitol on Earth Day, Cathy Johnson took a break from lobbying lawmakers for regulation of hyperscale data centers.

Johnson, a former middle school teacher, considers herself an unlikely advocate.

“I was born to do my job and I loved it. And I loved my retirement,” she said.

But when two large plots of land near her Farmington home became a possible data center destination, Johnson became a full-time opponent.

“When I heard about the amount of water use and the amount of electricity use, I just read everything I could about data centers,” she said.

Johnson is part of a group of Farmington residents who joined together to stop the project. They’re united in their concerns about the project’s energy, water and land use. They worry about light and noise pollution. They’re backing a lawsuit that they hope will stop the project and others proposed around the state.

Johnson, who is liberal, said those concerns defy party affiliation at a time when communities and the country are politically divided.

“This is a community issue, and whether you are a Republican or a Democrat, air pollution and water pollution affects you equally,” she said.

People at the Minnesota Captiol protesting
Coalition for Responsible Data Center Development Chair Cathy Johnson stands at the Minnesota Capitol on Earth Day, April 22. She is working to stop a hyperscale data center in Farmington, where she lives.
Catharine Richert | MPR News

Jobs and lower taxes

The new data center has been under consideration for several years in Farmington.

Mayor Nick Lien said he thinks the data center would bring good to the community – namely jobs and a wider tax base. He said because Farmington is so rural, property owners bear most of the tax burden, not commercial businesses.

“Enter the data center. These are large commercial properties with a huge property tax footprint to them that are generally a means to balancing out that ratio of your commercial to residential tax burden,” he said. “It's favorable in that regard.”

On a website dedicated to the project, developer Tract promises the project will bring more than 275 jobs to the area and $18 million in new funding for public schools. The developer details plans to ensure the aquifer near the project is protected and says the center will comply with local ordinances.

Tract recently clarified that the entire project’s annual water usage will be capped at 50 million gallons.

Lien said irrigating the old golf course where the center would sit was about the same amount of water.

But he said that these messages haven’t been embraced by people who oppose the project. That’s partly because there’s a third-party developer involved with no tenant announced yet. City staff signed non-disclosure agreements around the project, which limited what they could say about the development until recently. Lien said he and other elected officials did not sign those agreements.

“You have this long stretch of time with ambiguous information. And when ambiguity exists, people will insert the worst case into all of them and assume that the worst case for all of them is what's going to happen here,” he said.

Farmington Mayor Nick Lien poses for photo
Farmington Mayor Nick Lien is in favor of a data center. He said it will bring jobs and widen the tax base, on April 23.
Catharine Richert | MPR News

A lack of trust

Dave Akin’s family goes back five generations in Farmington. His father used to be mayor.

But recently Akin, who lives near the proposed data center site, said he’s lost trust in the people who run the city he has lived in all his life.

“I'm still extremely respectful of their positions, the struggles they have to go through to make decisions. It's just so hard to have trust these days on so many levels because it's like, ‘Oh non-disclosure [agreements]’” he said. “So it's just exhausting, because we go to meetings, we try to be heard. We're not heard.”

Akin is a Democrat. His neighbor, Nancy Arsted, is a Republican. But they share frustration over transparency at the city level.

“‘We the people,’” she said, quoting the opening words of the U.S. Constitution. “‘We the people’ should be about the people, and it's not about the people,” she said. “This is about money, big money, that's all."

Lifelong Republican Ann Mikiska has also found unexpected connections with Democrats.

"I don't normally sit down and have conversations and coffee with a bunch of Democrats. I just don't because I don't agree with so much of it,” she said.

This fall, she's looking for candidates who will resist data centers — even if they're Democrats.

"This will be a very important thing,” she said. “It might get me to cross party lines for the first time."

Ann Mikiska sits on her back porch
Ann Mikiska sits on her back porch on April 23. She is a lifelong Republican who has found new connections with Democrats opposing the Farmington data center.
Catharine Richert | MPR News

Unlikely bedfellows

At the Capitol, the issue has created some unlikely bedfellows, too.

Rep. Emma Greenman, DFL-Minneapolis, and Rep. Drew Roach, R-Farmington, aligned to demand transparency around data center development.

They want to curb non-disclosure agreements around development projects because they’re used to keep details of data center proposals secret.

Greenman said NDAs erode trust.

“Communities have the capability and the right to make these decisions and not sort of have that circumvented and subverted by these private contracts that are being written by the biggest companies in the world,” he said.

Roach agrees. He's happy the issue has energized voters across the political spectrum because it’s a bright spot of common ground when there’s little else to agree on.

“If that frustration and that reality is what is the motivating factor for them to get involved in paying attention in their local government, then it's a good thing,” he said.

Non-disclosure agreement legislation was passed in the Senate last month, but its prospects in the House aren’t clear.

Two lawmakers posing for photo inside of state capitol
Data center scrutiny has been a rare source of bipartisanship at the state Capitol. Rep. Drew Roach, R-Farmington, and Rep. Emma Greenman, DFL-Minneapolis, are backing a bill that would prevent municipalities from signing non-disclosure agreements with data center developers.
Catharine Richert | MPR News



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


In an era marked by unprecedented technological advance, seismic social change, and deepening global interdependence, South Asia’s most transformative minds and hearts are now part of a ground-breaking and momentous global reckoning of influence.

Drawing from a pool of 1.9 million notables across 195 countries, the Britain‑based Impact Hallmarks©️ has unveiled around 183 finalists for its international opinion poll for the Quarticentennial Merited Impacts Gazette (2000–2025), a landmark initiative aimed at documenting those whose work has reshaped the first quarter of 21st century through measurable, enduring impact rather than transient fame. The public voting phase is currently live online, inviting citizens worldwide to decide not by visibility, but by the depth of contribution across humanitarian, scientific, ecological, and socio‑economic domains.

Covering a vast forefront of the South Asia’s cohort are Indian icons, individuals whose lives have become templates for systemic change and human dignity in our time. Nobel Laureate Kailash Satyarthi stands as a towering figure among child rights advocates globally, his relentless campaigns over decades contributing to the rescue of millions of children from exploitation, smuggling,  denial of education and prostitution. With a moral compass that has influenced international policy and grassroots rescue operations alike, his work epitomises an India‑rooted but globally relevant struggle for human freedom.

Alongside Satyarthi, Arunima Sinha embodies an extraordinary narrative of resilience and possibility. Having become the first female amputee to climb Mount Everest, she rewrote parameters of physical endurance and transformed personal triumph into advocacy for disability rights and empowerment. Her climb was not merely a physical conquest but a symbolic reorientation of societal assumptions about ability, courage, and perseverance.

Also representing India in the roster of global finalists are innovators whose work bridges scientific ingenuity with human welfare. Nitesh Kumar Jangir, recognised for developing affordable, life‑saving neonatal medical technologies, stands at the intersection of humanitarian impact and technological innovation, directly improving outcomes for countless families who previously lacked access to vital medical care. Dr Fathima Benazir J., a molecular biologist whose work is cited for enhancing laboratory safety and practical applications in child health, further highlights how Indian scientific contribution is yielding direct benefits to society at large.

Among the Pakistani finalists, the narrative of impact is equally rich and systemic. Dr Amjad Saqib, founder of the Akhuwat Foundation, has pioneered one of the world’s largest interest‑free microfinance networks, steering millions out of poverty with respect for dignity and solidarity. His model of Mawakhat — social brotherhood — blends economic inclusion with community empowerment. Prof Dr Aurangzeb Hafi, the arch-polymath of 21st century, a living legend of intellectual realms whose cross‑disciplinary research-work spans over 93 subjects fields and epistemological orbits including Cosmology, Primordiology, Public Health and Phygital Education, is recognised for research contributions that redefine how science interfaces with society and nature. His major contributions include identification of the phenomenon of subsoil hydro-toxification of underground water reserves due to the prevailing sewage-drainage systems. Other accomplishments include the breakthrough discovery of Magneto-Hydro-Tropism (MHT) and Deca-archic Model of Phygital Literacy. He also led ‘Child Retardation Risk Assessment’ programme in the aftermath of Asian Tsunami of 2004. He was, subsequently nominated for Noble Prize, which he declined on ethico-moral basis. His major area of research is prevention of multiple disabilities at pre-birth stage and in the newly born babies. Other Pakistani voices in the poll include community leaders and youth activists such as Parveen Saeed, and young campaigners Ghulam Bisher Hafi and Ubaida Al Fiddhah Hafiah, whose “Voice for the Voiceless” initiative spotlights the plight of children in conflict zones. The legacy of service from icons like Bilquis Edhi and Dr Ruth Pfau — whose decades of compassionate work continue to inspire public health and welfare efforts — is also honoured in the merit index.

Figures from Sri Lanka bring forward narratives of depth and bridge‑building: Dr Jehan Perera, a veteran peacebuilder and human rights advocate, has over decades worked to cultivate inter‑ethnic and inter‑faith reconciliation, embedding social cohesion in communities once fractured by conflict. Prof Chandra Wickramasinghe has propelled Sri Lanka into the orbit of foundational scientific debate with his research on cosmic dust and panspermia, inviting humanity to reconsider the universality and origins of life itself — a work resonating across astrophysics, biology, and philosophical inquiry.

Dr Asha de Vos, a marine scientist, has reshaped global understandings of whale populations and marine biodiversity, rooting conservation in empirical evidence and local ecological realities. Dr A.T. Ariyaratne, whose grassroots development movement has uplifted thousands of rural communities through participatory, sustainable practices, completes this quartet of Sri Lankan nominees whose impacts are both local and global.

The South Asian list is further enriched by nominees from Bangladesh and Nepal whose work has shaped socio‑economic and humanitarian landscapes. Prof Yunus of Bangladesh, who stood as an architect of financial inclusion that has transformed rural economies by elevating beggars, through dignity‑based lending.

Pushpa Basnet of Nepal has become a global exemplar in rescuing and educating children of incarcerated parents, demonstrating how systemic compassion can restructure societal norms around justice and care.

Across the full slate of global finalists, other notable figures illustrate the broader thematic span of the poll — from Chen Si in China, whose daily interventions at Nanjing’s Yangtze River Bridge have directly prevented hundreds of suicides through sustained compassion and dialogue, to intellectual giants like Shing‑Tung Yau, whose resolution of deep mathematical problems continues to foundationally shape theoretical physics.

Impact Hallmarks make it very clear that the poll for Quarticentennial Merited Impacts Gazette is not a popularity contest but, just a validation layer for a historic archive of influence measured by tangible contribution.

Designed to serve as the “living ledger of influence” for the first 25 years of the century, the initiative seeks to capture values, priorities and transformative endeavours that have authored the narratives of change, from humanitarian advances to cross‑disciplinary scientific innovation.

As public voting continues through the official portal, global participation will help determine which of these remarkable individuals will be inscribed most indelibly in the record of 21st‑century impact — an era increasingly defined not by celebrity but by sustained, measurable transformation.

Public voting is underway at the official portal: [https://www.impacthallmarks.org/#voting]





Source link