Feds: Fraud ringleader leaked documents from jail



the Feeding Our Future fraud case

Federal prosecutors in Minneapolis are asking a judge to prohibit convicted fraudster Aimee Bock from speaking with her two adult sons from jail after she allegedly directed the men to send sensitive evidence from her case to elected officials and the news media ahead of her May 21 sentencing.

In March 2025, a jury found Bock and restaurateur Salim Said guilty of charges including wire fraud and bribery for their roles in a scheme to steal around $250 million from taxpayer-funded child nutrition programs during the COVID-19 pandemic by submitting false reimbursement claims for meals.

Because of the scale of the theft, Bock could face life in prison under federal sentencing guidelines. Bock is among 79 defendants charged in the wider case since September 2022, which prosecutors say was the nation’s largest pandemic-era fraud scheme.

The investigation has since led to fraud charges in connection with several Medicaid programs in Minnesota. Bock is white, but most of her co-defendants in the Feeding Our Future case are Somali-American. National attention to the case in late 2025 prompted racist comments from President Donald Trump along with increased immigration enforcement targeting the community, though the vast majority are naturalized U.S. citizens.

A man points to a woman sitting down
A prosecutor points to Aimee Bock during the Feeding Our Future trial on Feb. 10, 2025.
Cedric Hohnstadt

The government has secured 65 convictions, largely through guilty pleas. Of the 13 people sentenced, Abdiaziz Farah, another key player, received 28 years, the longest prison term handed down so far. Farah could face additional time when he’s sentenced separately for his role in an attempt to bribe a juror during his 2024 trial.

In a document filed on Tuesday, Assistant U.S. Attorneys Matthew Murphy and Rebecca Kline allege that Bock, 45, the founder of the defunct nonprofit Feeding Our Future, violated a 2022 protective order from U.S. District Judge Nancy Brasel that requires all parties to the case to hold most evidence in the case “in strict confidentiality.”

Murphy and Kline say that on April 2, an unnamed Minnesota state representative received two emails from a Proton Mail address. The sender, “Daisy Hill” claimed that “Tim Walz, Keith Ellison and the Minnesota Department of Education intentionally set Feeding Our Future and Aimee Bock up as a scapegoat.”

A March 17 email to MPR News from a sender with the same name includes identical language. In a subsequent message, the sender promised to send “examples of fraud in MN that were identified and stopped by Aimee Bock and Feeding Our Future.”

The emailer later sent files including screenshots of text messages, other communications, and audio recordings that Bock apparently made of conversations with operators of meal sites. MPR News did not verify the authenticity of the documents shared in the anonymous emails until the Minnesota U.S. Attorney’s Office leveled the fresh allegations against Bock in the Tuesday court filing.

MPR News replied to the “Daisy Hill” address on Tuesday to request comment about the government’s new allegations.

Kenneth Udoibok, Bock’s defense attorney, said in an email reply to MPR News that his client’s sons “in an inartful way” are “hoping that the media and the legislative branch see their mom’s plight. Aimee is not trying to harm or intimidate anyone; rather, she wants the whole truth out before the legislature and the president. She’s crying for help!!!”

In their motion, the prosecutors also recount that on April 21, they learned that a Minnesota Star Tribune reporter contacted an attorney for a cooperating witness in the case and said that “they had obtained copies of reports of two of the witnesses’ law enforcement interviews” and intended to quote from them in an article about “the conduct of certain uncharged individuals.”

Murphy and Kline write that they learned through another attorney that the reporter “had claimed to have over one hundred law enforcement interview reports” and that given their nature “they could only have come from the government’s discovery disclosures,” in violation of the protective order.

three people enter a federal courthouse
Aimee Bock (center), founder and executive director of the nonprofit organization Feeding Our Future arrives at the Minneapolis federal courthouse on March 19, 2025, in Minneapolis.
Kerem Yücel | MPR News

Bock has been held in the Sherburne County Jail for more than a year as she awaits sentencing. Citing recorded jail calls, prosecutors say Bock directed her son, Camden Bock, 20, to download documents from her case from a Dropbox account and send them to elected officials and news reporters.

“Her purpose for doing so can best be described as a public relations campaign — to seek to minimize her starring role in pilfering the Federal Child Nutrition Program while casting the ‘real’ blame for the rampant fraud on the Walz administration, state administrators and uncharged individuals,” Murphy and Kline write in their filing.

On March 16, the day before MPR News received the first email from “Daisy Hill,” Bock allegedly directed her son to download documents that she believed would show that she tried to combat fraud in the nonprofit she once led.

“She told Camden to remove the trial exhibit stickers, and other markings indicating the documents came from her federal criminal case, before emailing them from a newly created Proton Mail account to ‘all republicans [sic] and the media,’” the prosecutors write.

In late March, “Bock told Camden to send the files to ‘Republicans in DC,’ especially the ‘guy who told [Minnesota Attorney General Keith] Ellison he should be in jail’ and the ‘right wing people that [President] Trump follows.’”

On April 1, Bock allegedly told her son Cale Bock, 19, that a Star Tribune reporter had been planning a “whole story on [an uncharged individual] and why she never got indicted,” and explained that Camden used an email account with a “fake name.”

In a later conversation, when Camden voiced concerns that speaking to the media might result in a longer sentence, Bock allegedly replied “they want to sentence me to life anyway.”

In an April 19 call with an unidentified person, according to prosecutors, Bock said that “someone had given the Star Tribune reporter “every interview the FBI did with people.”

Murphy and Kline write that they can’t say “with absolute certainty whether Bock is the person directly responsible” for leaking cooperating witness statements to the newspaper, “it is clear that she was leaking other protected documents” to the media and is endangering “the safety of those witnesses who have chosen to come forward and speak to law enforcement.”

The prosecutors are asking Judge Brasel to prohibit Bock from accessing her Dropbox account and surrender all copies of any protected files in her control, including Camden Bock’s computer. The government is also seeking to prohibit Bock from “any form of contact” with her sons prior to her sentencing hearing.

Brasel ordered Bock’s attorney to respond to the government’s request by 5 p.m. Wednesday. A hearing on the motion is scheduled for Thursday afternoon.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


There was a time when pricing a product was mostly guesswork. You’d look at your costs, tack on a margin, maybe peek at what a competitor was doing, and then hope it all worked out. That approach feels almost quaint now.

The reality is, shoppers today are sharper and faster than ever. They can compare your price with half a dozen competitors in the time it takes to open an app. Competitors themselves change their prices constantly. Stock levels rise and fall by the hour. In that kind of environment, the old “set it and forget it” model simply can’t keep up.

This is where AI-driven pricing solutions come in. Instead of relying on gut feelings or periodic reviews, algorithms crunch mountains of data in real time—things like customer behavior, market demand, and even the weather—to recommend smarter prices.

From Static Prices to Something More Fluid

If you’re still managing prices manually, you’re already behind. AI doesn’t get tired, it doesn’t forget to check competitor websites, and it doesn’t need weeks of reports to react. It can spot a sudden surge in demand or a dip in inventory and adjust instantly.

Some of the ways it works are pretty straightforward:

  • It can see demand spikes before they overwhelm supply.
  • It balances margins with what customers are likely to accept.
  • It notices when competitors change prices and helps you react.
  • It prevents over-discounting, so you’re not just slashing prices unnecessarily.

Restaurants, brick-and-mortar shops, service businesses—anyone selling products or services can plug into these tools.

How It Fits into the Rest of the Business

AI pricing doesn’t run in isolation. It works best when tied into the systems you already use:

  • Electronic shelf labels. Those digital price tags you’ve probably seen in supermarkets can change automatically when the algorithm says it’s time. No more scrambling to swap paper tags during a sale.
  • Inventory systems. Got products collecting dust? AI can nudge you to discount them. On the flip side, if something’s flying off the shelves, it may suggest a price bump to protect margin.
  • Competitor monitoring. Instead of spending hours checking other sites, AI can scrape competitor data in the background and adjust your numbers accordingly.
  • Promotions. Not only does it tell you when to run a discount, it can help you figure out how deep the cut should be, and for how long, while showing you the likely outcome beforehand.
  • Customer behavior. If someone keeps coming back to look at an item but hasn’t purchased, the system might push out a small discount to tip them over the edge.

What’s in It for Retailers?

The obvious draw is better profit margins. Many retailers report increases of 8–12% once they stop over-discounting and start pricing with precision. But there are other wins too:

  • Prices that update when they need to, not once a month.
  • Stock that moves more quickly, which frees up cash and space.
  • Consistency across channels, so online and in-store aren’t out of sync.
  • Less time spent wrestling with spreadsheets and more time thinking strategically.
  • Customers who feel prices are fairer, which builds trust.

What Shoppers Think About It

From the buyer’s side, the experience is a mixed bag. On the plus side, they often get deals that reflect real demand. If there’s plenty of stock, they may see lower prices. If an item is scarce, the price nudges up, which can create urgency to buy sooner.

On the downside, fast-changing prices can feel unfair. Nobody likes paying more today for something that was cheaper yesterday. That’s why communication matters. If shoppers can see why prices have shifted—through shelf labels, app messages, or clear notes online—they tend to be more accepting. In fact, some even like the game of “catching” the price at the right time.

So, Why Choose AI Pricing Solutions?

AI is already shaping how retailers compete. The companies sticking with static pricing models are quietly handing ground to those who can adjust quickly and intelligently.

If you’re considering it, you don’t need to overhaul your entire business at once. Start with one product line, test it, and expand as you learn. The important thing is to begin. Because in retail today, the “right price at the right moment” is crucial, and it’s the outcome of smarter systems working behind the scenes.


Also Read: 5 Ways Artificial Intelligence Helps in Personalized Marketing



Source link