Instagram’s AI Chatbot Gave Away a Bunch of Accounts to Hackers


You may have heard that some notable Instagram accounts were hacked over the weekend. Barack Obama’s White House account was arguably the biggest among them. 

What you may not have heard is that the hackers didn’t have to try very hard: Meta’s AI customer support chatbot essentially handed the accounts over. 

According to 404 Media, hackers simply had to request that Meta’s AI support assistant chatbot change the email address associated with the targeted account. Hackers then tricked the bot into initiating a password reset without requiring identity verification. The AI then sent an access code to the hacker’s own email address, which the hacker copied into the chat. This prompted the AI to display a “Reset Password” button, which was then used to modify the password and take control of the account. 

There’s even an edited step-by-step video of the process on X. The hacker used a VPN to make it seem they were in the target’s location, and the AI quickly obliged with the request. At no point did the hacker even need the user’s email address or original password.

The security breach hit accounts, including makeup retailer Sephora and US Space Force Master Sergeant, John Bentivegna. It’s unclear how many accounts were affected in total, but many users reported being hacked on Reddit and X over the weekend, including security researcher Jane Wong. 

“The password got changed without my knowledge and I was getting different password reset attempts throughout yesterday,” Jane said on X. “And I got repeatedly logged out from the [Instagram] iOS app. Quite concerning.”

How did the hack happen? 

The problem is almost entirely due to Meta’s customer support now being run by AI. The tech giant made the switch back in March, saying it would enable “24/7 help for account issues like updating your password and settings for your profile.” 

But with the AI chatbot handling the whole process, humans couldn’t step in when suspicious activity began. That allowed hackers to carry out the social engineering-style attack and pull it off multiple times before anyone noticed.

AI Atlas

Per Cybersecurity News, security researchers ZachXBT and Dark Web Informer were the first to publicly expose the exploit, but not before several high-profile accounts were stolen. Dark Web Informer tracked the sale of many of these high-profile accounts in real time. Some of those accounts were bundled together at a $1 million asking price. 

Instagram spokesperson Andy Stone said in a post on X that the exploit has since been fixed. 404 Media reports that Meta is in the middle of “securing impacted accounts.”

Meta has not yet responded to a request for comment. 

How to protect yourself from similar attacks

The social engineering exploit had one major flaw: It did not work on accounts with multifactor authentication. Those accounts either already had the code in their authentication app of choice or received it by text. Without the MFA setting, the one-time reset code appears to be sent to an email address of choice, thereby letting hackers just, well, have it. 

The best way to protect yourself is to enable multifactor authentication, which is available on all of Meta’s platforms. It won’t protect you 100% of the time, but it’s a lot better than a password by itself, and it would’ve protected against this particular exploit entirely. 

There are other things you can do to beef up account security, including using passkeys where available and a private email address to make your account credentials harder to find.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Just a few months ago, Elon Musk accused the AI company Anthropic of stealing artificial intelligence training data “at massive scale” in a post on his social network X

That apparently hasn’t stopped the billionaire from doing business with the company. Musk’s SpaceX has signed a data center deal that will give Anthropic access to more than 200,000 Nvidia GPUs worth of power at its Colossus 1 supercomputer facility in Tennessee.

The partnership will give Anthropic additional firepower to “directly improve capacity for Claude Pro and Claude Max subscribers,” SpaceX said in a website post. “As part of this agreement, Anthropic also expressed interest in partnering to develop multiple gigawatts of orbital AI compute capacity.”

Because of this deal, Anthropic said in its own post, the company is raising usage limits for users across some of its products. The changes, effective immediately, double Claude Code rate limits for users of Claude on Pro, Max, Team and seat-based Enterprise plans, remove peak-hour restrictions of Claude Code for Pro and Max accounts and raise API limits for Claude Opus models.

More AI means more data center deals

In the same post, Anthropic listed some of its other data center agreements with companies, including Amazon, Google and Microsoft, and reiterated its intention to keep expanding internationally. In the era of data center backlashes, Anthropic also announced in February that it has pledged to cover the costs of energy price increases driven by data center activity. Critics have questioned how companies such as Anthropic can uphold those pledges.

The deal with SpaceX, which acquired Musk’s AI company xAI earlier this year, may have surprised some, but AI companies are scrambling to secure data center resources as they continue to develop increasingly data-hungry artificial intelligence models.

At the same time, some communities are pushing back on new data center construction, leading some in the industry, Musk in particular, to plan to build data centers in space

Among the groups criticizing the deal is the NAACP, which said in a statement about SpaceX, “Any company that disregards the obvious environmental and health concerns of Black communities to supposedly power a future that will help us all is sending a clear message about who it intends to serve in that future… Anthropic’s use of a data center that pollutes a historically Black community is, at best, an uninformed decision, and at worst, a total disregard for the community’s wishes and health.”

The organization pointed to a lawsuit it has filed against SpaceX over environmental concerns at its Colossus 1 computing center.





Source link