Minn. health systems rank high, but disparities remain



A health care professional performs check ups on patients.

A new analysis of health inequities shows that racial and ethnic disparities are widespread and persist in all 50 states, including Minnesota.

The 2026 State Health Disparities Report released Wednesday by the Commonwealth Fund, a nonprofit private foundation that supports independent research on health policy and health systems, analyzed 24 indicators to measure health care access, quality of care and health outcomes for five racial and ethnic groups from 2022 to 2024.

Authors of the report note that recent federal policy changes, such as cuts to Medicaid funding and the expiration of Affordable Care Act subsidies, are not reflected in the data; but these changes are likely to have worsened existing disparities and are expected to widen them even further.

Minnesota is one of the top states for overall health care system performance, surpassing 38 other states. White people in the state experience the best health care outcomes, scoring in the 91st percentile among all population groups nationwide. In contrast, American Indian and Alaska Native people face the poorest health care outcomes in the state, scoring only in the 13th percentile. Additionally, when compared to other states, Minnesota's health care system performs below average for Black residents.

“As a primary care physician, I’ve seen how racial and ethnic disparities not only harm the people experiencing them but also weaken the entire system. Our report shows even high-performing states are not immune,” Dr. Joseph Betancourt, president of the Commonwealth Fund, said in a statement.

In Minnesota, 24 percent of Hispanic adults are uninsured compared to 13 percent of uninsured Black adults and 7 percent of Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander adults.

Data from every state indicate that premature deaths and avoidable deaths — defined as those occurring before the age of 75 from preventable causes or treatable conditions like diabetes and certain cancers — are more prevalent among Black individuals than among other racial and ethnic groups. However, the highest rates of premature deaths are found among the American Indian and Alaska Native population in Minnesota.

The authors of the report noted that racial disparities in the U.S. health care system are among the most persistent and well-documented issues. They referenced landmark studies showing that these disparities continue to exist, even when accounting for factors such as insurance coverage, income level and access to care.

The root causes of these disparities are complex and multifaceted, they said, including the enduring effects of structural racism, the impact of social determinants of health, variations in health coverage and unequal treatment within the healthcare system.

In order to address these issues, researchers suggest implementing policies that ensure affordable, comprehensive and equitable health insurance coverage for all, strengthening primary care services and protecting access to preventative care.

Laurie Zephyrin, senior vice president of achieving equitable outcomes at the Commonwealth Fund, said in a statement that examining state-level health care reveals significant disparities in the quality of care received by different populations.

“Those differences are not random,” Zephyrin said. “They track along racial and ethnic lines in every state, and the federal policy changes now underway will make it harder to improve health for everyone. But this report also shows that state policy choices matter: when states invest in coverage and care, people benefit.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Meta has agreed to “substantially reduce” its use of the PG-13 ratings system in relation to its Teen Accounts on Instagram starting April 15.

Last year, the Motion Picture Association objected to Meta directly referencing its movie content rating, which cautions parents against letting their pre-teens engage with certain media. In a cease-and-desist letter seen by  at the time, the MPA said that Meta claiming its were comparable to PG-13 ratings was “literally false and highly misleading.”

The MPA argued that its guidelines for the established movie-ratings system and Meta’s own explanation of the revamped accounts for minors did not align, and that drawing a link could have a detrimental effect on the MPA’s public image by association. It also said that Meta’s system seemingly relies heavily on AI to determine what younger users see on the social media platform.

When introducing the changes in 2025, Meta said that the risk of seeing “suggestive content” or hearing certain language in a movie rated 13+ was a good way of framing something similar happening on an Instagram teen account. It added that it was doing all it could to keep such instances to a minimum.

Meta has now updated that initial blog about the changes after coming to an agreement with the MPA, adding a lengthy disclaimer that reads, in part, “there are lots of differences between social media and movies. We didn’t work with the MPA when updating our content settings, they’re not rating any content on Instagram, and they’re not endorsing or approving our content settings in any way.”

Meta goes on to explain that it drew “inspiration” from the MPA guidance given its familiarity with parents, as well as feedback it had received from parents, and will continue to do so. The difference is that it won’t make the connection so explicitly in its communications going forward.

“Today’s agreement clearly distinguishes the MPA’s film ratings from Instagram’s Teen Account content moderation tools,” said Charles Rivkin, Chairman and CEO of the MPA. “While we welcome efforts to protect kids from content that may not be appropriate for them, this agreement helps ensure that parents do not conflate the two systems – which operate in very different contexts. The MPA is proud of the trust we have built with parents for nearly sixty years with our film rating system, and we will continue to do everything we can to protect that trust.”



Source link