Minnesota's Green energy growth slows, coal use is up



Sheep graze under solar panels

The majority of electricity used in Minnesota continues to come from carbon-free sources, but the growth of green energy generation has slowed, while the use of coal grew over the past year, according to a report released this week from Clean Energy Economy Minnesota and the Business Council for Sustainable Energy.

Zero-carbon sources including wind and solar power and nuclear energy supplied 55 percent of Minnesota’s electricity in 2025. That’s well over the national average of 43 percent, and it’s the sixth straight year clean energy has supplied more than half of the state’s power.

“Minnesota continues to be a leader at the forefront of the energy transition,” said Gregg Mast, executive director of Clean Energy Economy Minnesota at an event Thursday announcing the release of the 2026 Energy Factsheet.

But the total of the state’s electricity coming from renewable sources has remained flat since 2022. And significant growth is needed for the state is to meet its mandate to produce 100 percent of electricity from carbon-free sources by 2040.

Renewable sources have generated one-third of the state’s electricity for the past three years. Over the past year, the share of the state’s electricity generated by coal grew from 20 to 24 percent— although looking back over the past decade, the use of coal has dropped by 15 percent.

Nuclear energy’s use ticked up two points to 22 percent over the past year, and has held fairly steady over the past decade. Natural gas, which burns cleaner than coal but still produces greenhouse gas emissions, declined from 27 to 21 percent of the state’s energy mix last year. But over the past decade, the state’s use of gas has grown by eight percent.

The state’s greenhouse gas emissions held steady over the past year, after three consecutive years of declines. Minnesota has cut emissions nearly in half over the past 20 years, outpacing the national reduction of 38 percent.

Despite that progress, the state is not on pace to meet its goal of cutting greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2030, compared to 2005 levels, and to reach net-zero emissions by 2050.

Renewable energy development in Minnesota and nationwide has faced significant hurdles in President Donald Trump’s second term. The federal government has terminated billions of dollars in grants for renewable energy and electric grid modernization projects.

“Minnesota is not arguing, we are transitioning. It is only Washington, D.C. that is arguing against the clean energy transition,” said Pete Wyckoff, deputy commissioner of energy resources at the Minnesota Department of Commerce.

Still, headwinds remain. Residential solar installations, for example, have slowed since the federal government eliminated tax credits for them, said Marty Morud, president of TruNorth Solar in the Twin Cities.

“The phone has not been ringing nearly as often this year as it was last year,” said Morud, who added that some some homeowners have to wait years for utilities to interconnect their solar systems to the electric grid.

But Minnesota is part of a global trend showing a rapid transition to renewable energy, said Wyckoff. Around the world, wind and solar met 99 percent of new energy demand last year, Wyckoff said.

In Minnesota, wind and solar accounted for 98 percent of all new electric generation capacity added in the past five years. The state added 264 megawatts of new solar capacity in 2025, nearly ten times the amount of natural gas added to the state’s energy mix.

“In Minnesota, we don't tilt at windmills,” Wyckoff said. “We erect wind turbines, and more recently, solar panels, and we dig geothermal wells.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Meta has agreed to “substantially reduce” its use of the PG-13 ratings system in relation to its Teen Accounts on Instagram starting April 15.

Last year, the Motion Picture Association objected to Meta directly referencing its movie content rating, which cautions parents against letting their pre-teens engage with certain media. In a cease-and-desist letter seen by  at the time, the MPA said that Meta claiming its were comparable to PG-13 ratings was “literally false and highly misleading.”

The MPA argued that its guidelines for the established movie-ratings system and Meta’s own explanation of the revamped accounts for minors did not align, and that drawing a link could have a detrimental effect on the MPA’s public image by association. It also said that Meta’s system seemingly relies heavily on AI to determine what younger users see on the social media platform.

When introducing the changes in 2025, Meta said that the risk of seeing “suggestive content” or hearing certain language in a movie rated 13+ was a good way of framing something similar happening on an Instagram teen account. It added that it was doing all it could to keep such instances to a minimum.

Meta has now updated that initial blog about the changes after coming to an agreement with the MPA, adding a lengthy disclaimer that reads, in part, “there are lots of differences between social media and movies. We didn’t work with the MPA when updating our content settings, they’re not rating any content on Instagram, and they’re not endorsing or approving our content settings in any way.”

Meta goes on to explain that it drew “inspiration” from the MPA guidance given its familiarity with parents, as well as feedback it had received from parents, and will continue to do so. The difference is that it won’t make the connection so explicitly in its communications going forward.

“Today’s agreement clearly distinguishes the MPA’s film ratings from Instagram’s Teen Account content moderation tools,” said Charles Rivkin, Chairman and CEO of the MPA. “While we welcome efforts to protect kids from content that may not be appropriate for them, this agreement helps ensure that parents do not conflate the two systems – which operate in very different contexts. The MPA is proud of the trust we have built with parents for nearly sixty years with our film rating system, and we will continue to do everything we can to protect that trust.”



Source link