OpenAI’s Rumored Phone Would Replace Apps With AI Agents


OpenAI has long been interested in getting into the hardware business. So far, the company behind ChatGPT has been linked to wearables, working on launching AI earbuds later this year or early 2027. But industry analyst Ming-Chi Kuo reported on X over the weekend that OpenAI is working on building a smartphone in partnership with component-makers MediaTek, Qualcomm and Luxshare.

Kuo said MediaTek and Qualcomm would help design a smartphone chip for the device, while Luxshare would act as a co-design and manufacturing partner. Most premium Android phones coming out in 2026 will use either Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or MediaTek’s Dimensity 9500 chips, so it makes sense for OpenAI to tap the companies making processors for most of the top-end phones that come out every year. 

AI Atlas

For years, both MediaTek and Qualcomm have envisioned AI agents as the future of how people will use their phones, which would handle tasks across multiple apps for you. AI agents would be at the core of OpenAI’s smartphone, Kuo said, effectively eliminating the need for separate apps. 

“Users are not trying to use a pile of apps,” Kuo said. “They are trying to get tasks done and fulfill needs through the phone. This fundamentally changes how people think about smartphones.” 

OpenAI’s hardware ambitions have included a high-profile partnership with former Apple designer Jony Ive. One recent rumor was that the devices could include one worn in the ear, but that OpenAI could have as many as five different devices ready by the end of 2028.

At the same time, OpenAI has been reportedly trying to cut down on so-called “side quests,” axing its Sora video generator and putting a planned ChatGPT “adult mode” on hiatus in favor of a more productivity-focused “super app” said to be built around the Codex coding tool.

Read also: ChatGPT Images 2: Why OpenAI Built a New Image Model After Killing Sora

Kuo reported that specifications and suppliers for the rumored smartphone are expected to be done by the end of the year or the first quarter of 2027, with production expected in 2028.

OpenAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 

(Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET’s parent company, in April 2025 filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.)





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Meta has agreed to “substantially reduce” its use of the PG-13 ratings system in relation to its Teen Accounts on Instagram starting April 15.

Last year, the Motion Picture Association objected to Meta directly referencing its movie content rating, which cautions parents against letting their pre-teens engage with certain media. In a cease-and-desist letter seen by  at the time, the MPA said that Meta claiming its were comparable to PG-13 ratings was “literally false and highly misleading.”

The MPA argued that its guidelines for the established movie-ratings system and Meta’s own explanation of the revamped accounts for minors did not align, and that drawing a link could have a detrimental effect on the MPA’s public image by association. It also said that Meta’s system seemingly relies heavily on AI to determine what younger users see on the social media platform.

When introducing the changes in 2025, Meta said that the risk of seeing “suggestive content” or hearing certain language in a movie rated 13+ was a good way of framing something similar happening on an Instagram teen account. It added that it was doing all it could to keep such instances to a minimum.

Meta has now updated that initial blog about the changes after coming to an agreement with the MPA, adding a lengthy disclaimer that reads, in part, “there are lots of differences between social media and movies. We didn’t work with the MPA when updating our content settings, they’re not rating any content on Instagram, and they’re not endorsing or approving our content settings in any way.”

Meta goes on to explain that it drew “inspiration” from the MPA guidance given its familiarity with parents, as well as feedback it had received from parents, and will continue to do so. The difference is that it won’t make the connection so explicitly in its communications going forward.

“Today’s agreement clearly distinguishes the MPA’s film ratings from Instagram’s Teen Account content moderation tools,” said Charles Rivkin, Chairman and CEO of the MPA. “While we welcome efforts to protect kids from content that may not be appropriate for them, this agreement helps ensure that parents do not conflate the two systems – which operate in very different contexts. The MPA is proud of the trust we have built with parents for nearly sixty years with our film rating system, and we will continue to do everything we can to protect that trust.”



Source link