Your Old Fridge Is Costing You. Here’s How Much Energy a New Model Saves Each Year


New, more energy-efficient appliances may cost you at the register, but the savings tend to catch up over time. Most people think of heat pumps or solar panels when they hear “long-term energy-saving investment,” but your refrigerator quietly makes the same case. 

Newer models use considerably less electricity than those from even 10 years ago, and that gap in energy use translates directly into lower utility bills.

CNET We Do the Math badge; click here for more

I wanted to put an actual number on it, so I did a ton of math, analyzing 2,630 fridges and their Energy Star data to compare today’s models to those from 2016. (While I didn’t calculate the energy delta for fridges older than 2016, it’s almost certainly greater.) 

Here’s how much energy and money you could save by making the switch.

Where my fridge data comes from

energy star data

Publicly available Energy Star data is a major player in this analysis.

Screenshot by John Carlsen/CNET

For my 2025 samples, I analyzed energy usage in modern Energy Star-certified models. For 2016, I couldn’t rely on Energy Star data because it lists only models that meet the most recent standards, not earlier ones.

Instead, I sourced my 2016 data from the California Energy Commission’s Modernized Appliance Efficiency Database System. Rather than cover 42 refrigerator classes individually, I grouped them into the following broad categories:

Fridge types analyzed

Sample size: 2025 Sample size: 2016
Top-mounted freezers 385 137
Bottom-mounted freezers 440 192
Side-by-sides 23 68
Compact refrigerators 1,235 150
Total 2,083 547

I didn’t look at standalone refrigerators because there wasn’t enough data from either sample group to perform a meaningful comparison. Standalone freezers are a different Energy Star dataset that I didn’t include.

It was essential to exclude older products from the modern data

fridge-french-door

I excluded any fridges manufactured before 2021.

Whirlpool

The current slate of Energy Star-qualified fridges includes models dating back to January 2014, so I narrowed my list of candidates to products that hit the market in 2021 or later — the last time Energy Star updated its criteria. While this technically means that this isn’t a one-to-one comparison of 2025 and 2016, it reflects important details:

  • Stores don’t exclusively carry fridges from the current calendar year, so the data should at least reflect what’s available at retail.
  • Many of the most efficient fridges were released before 2025.
  • It’s entirely possible that a fridge rolled off the factory line a month ago, despite earning a certification in 2021.

Comparing your existing fridge

I suggest using Energy Star’s Flip Your Fridge Calculator to compare your current refrigerator with this analysis. It provides a rough estimate based on your fridge’s age, size, configuration and local electricity price. For more current electricity prices, check your recent billing statement.

energyguide calculate

Screenshot by John Carlsen/CNET

Likewise, you can look up an Energy Guide Label with your fridge’s model number for an exact yearly electricity use figure. I use the latest Energy Information Administration data from 2024 for my calculations — 2025’s data isn’t finalized as of the publishing of this article. It lists the residential national average at $0.1648 per kilowatt-hour.

The magic number for each type of fridge

we-did-the-math-10-year-old-fridges-national-savings-summary-tables.png

John Carlsen/CNET

Because it all boils down to a refrigerator’s class and volume, I can’t give you a universal number that applies to every fridge. Instead, I’ll break down the highlights and average stats in each class. Finding retail pricing from 2016 (and 2025) proved to be a much more difficult task than I could resolve in the time I had for this analysis. Instead, I used the data to create simple energy savings guidelines below.

Fridges with the most potential savings over 10 years

fridgiare-fridge-bss.png

Energy-efficient side-by-side fridges yield the most savings, according to my calculations.

Frigidaire/CNET

If the added cost of upgrading to a new fridge (compared with buying or repairing a used one) is lower than the numbers below, the new fridge will likely offset that price difference through energy savings alone over the next 10 years:

  • Side-by-side refrigerators: $340
  • Bottom freezers: $272
  • Top freezers: $83
  • Compact refrigerators: $0 (average energy efficiency remains largely unchanged since 2016)

If a new fridge costs more than this efficiency premium, it will take longer to break even. Remember that while averages can give you a good rule of thumb, the most efficient appliances will save even more in energy costs. These numbers also don’t account for potential rebates from your utility company, so actual savings may be even higher.

Crucially, these numbers assume you aren’t switching to a different refrigerator type. For example, you’ll likely see even greater energy savings when replacing a side-by-side fridge with a bottom-freezer fridge.

Key takeaways

  • New side-by-side refrigerators will, on average, cut your energy costs more than any other type of fridge, though bottom freezers also saw some nice improvements over the last 10 years. Upgrading either type of fridge to a modern version is probably worth it.
  • The $83 in energy savings for top freezers over 10 years probably won’t be enough to justify an upgrade if your existing top freezer still works.
  • Modern compact refrigerator technology is largely identical to that of 2016. You don’t need to be picky with most models.

whirlpooltopfreezerproductphotos-8.jpg

A new top-mounted fridge could save just $83 in electricity over 10 years.

Chris Monroe/CNET

Top-mounted freezers

Top-mounted freezers

Top-mounted 2025 (average) 2016 (average)
Efficiency (vs. US standard) 10.80% 4.10%
Annual energy usage 344 kWh/yr 394 kWh/yr
Annual energy cost ($0.1648/kWh national average) $56.62 $64.94
Monthly savings vs. 2016 $0.69
Annual savings vs. 2016 $8.31
10-year savings vs. 2016 $83.14

  • Over 10 years, a new top-mounted freezer saves an estimated $83 in electricity bills compared with a 2016 model.
  • I couldn’t find a single example from the sample data (including the 2016 MAEDBS data) that doesn’t already meet the requirements for Energy Star Most Efficient 2025.
  • The average efficiency of modern Energy Star-rated top freezers is almost triple that of 2016.
  • Top freezers use less energy per cubic foot, on average, than bottom freezers and side-by-sides. They’re also the smallest full-size refrigerators.

gecompactbottomfreezerproductphotos-1.jpg

A new bottom-mounted freezer should save around $272 in electricity over 10 years.

Chris Monroe/CNET

Bottom-mounted freezers

Bottom-mounted 2025 (average) 2016 (average)
Efficiency (vs. US standard) 14.80% 8.50%
Annual energy usage 468 kWh/yr 633 kWh/yr
Annual energy cost ($0.1648/kWh national average) $77.09 $104.27
Monthly savings vs. 2016 $2.26
Annual savings vs. 2016 $27.18
10-year savings vs. 2016 $271.80

  • A new bottom-mounted freezer should save an estimated $272 in electricity bills over 10 years compared to a 2016 model.
  • Bottom freezer refrigerators earn higher efficiency scores on average than other full-size fridges, but their efficiency improvements since 2016 aren’t as pronounced as those of top freezers and side-by-sides.
  • Roughly 1 in 6 bottom freezers qualify for Energy Star Most Efficient 2025 — only three models from 2016 meet this standard.

Side-by-side

Side-by-side 2025 (average) 2016 (average)
Efficiency (vs. US standard) 12.70% 4.20%
Annual energy usage 507 kWh/yr 714 kWh/yr
Annual energy cost ($0.1648/kWh national average) $83.62 $117.63
Monthly savings vs. 2016 $2.83
Annual savings vs. 2016 $34.01
10-year savings vs. 2016 $340.08

lg-lfxs32726s-promo-pic.jpg

A side-by-side fridge is the winner in terms of potential energy savings.

Chris Monroe/CNET

  • A  new side-by-side refrigerator saves an average of $340 in electricity bills compared with a 2016 model, the largest savings in this analysis.
  • While five side-by-side refrigerator models (7%) from 2016 still meet modern Energy Star criteria, two of these also qualify for Energy Star Most Efficient 2025 — as opposed to a single product in the modern group.

Compact fridges

Compact 2025 (average) 2016 (average)
Efficiency (vs. US standard) 14.20% 14.70%
Annual energy usage 256 kWh/yr 252 kWh/yr
Annual energy cost ($0.1648/kWh national average) $42.13 $41.59
Monthly savings vs. 2016 -$0.05
Annual savings vs. 2016 -$0.54
10-year savings vs. 2016 -$5.44

whirpool-mini-fridge.png

Mini fridges haven’t become significantly more energy-efficient. 

Whirlpool

  • New compact refrigerators have roughly the same energy efficiency as their 2016 counterparts. In fact, the average 2016 model uses less energy.
  • While compact refrigerators use less energy overall than full-size fridges, they use more electricity per cubic foot.
  • 121 minifridge models (81%) from 2016 meet modern Energy Star criteria.
  • Roughly 5% of models from both sample groups qualify for Energy Star Most Efficient 2025.

Where you live also plays a role

we-did-the-math-10-year-old-fridges-regional-savings-summary-tables.png

Your regional energy costs can swing the savings in either direction.

John Carlsen/CNET

Electricity costs vary widely depending on the state and region you live in. For example, North Dakota’s average price in 2024 was just 11.51 cents per kilowatt-hour (the lowest in the US), while Hawaii’s was a whopping 42.86 cents.

The higher your electric rate, the more you’ll save on energy with a new fridge. Compared with the national average, residents of Hawaii, California, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Alaska will see additional energy savings of 51% to 160% when buying a new Energy Star refrigerator.

Conversely, savings will be much lower in states with relatively cheap electricity, such as North Dakota, Idaho, Nebraska, Louisiana and Washington, which average less than 12 cents per kilowatt-hour. In North Dakota’s case, that’s just $237.51 in savings on a side-by-side fridge — $102.56 less than the national average.

Efficiency math doesn’t add up for smart refrigerators

A person puts a package of shredded cheese into a refrigerator that has a large screen. This fridge has AI capabilities.

The exorbitant upfront cost of most premium smart fridges will likely cancel out your energy savings.

Samsung

While I don’t explicitly explore it in this analysis, smart fridges aren’t generally a good investment if your main goal is saving energy over time. It has nothing to do with energy efficiency and everything to do with the premium you’re paying for smart home tech.

For example, Samsung’s smart refrigerator models cost at least $700 more than their traditional counterparts — this easily obliterates any long-term energy savings. That said, smart fridges aren’t going away, and it’s OK to splurge if your budget allows.

How I did the math: Calculating efficiency data for fridges from 2016

Math Notes in the iPad's Calculator app

Calculating refrigerator efficiency was a major undertaking. 

Screenshot

When I started this analysis, I had no idea how bewildering refrigerator-efficiency regulations are in the US. But I needed to understand them to accurately calculate 2025 energy-efficiency values for all the 2016 models.

The simplest way to explain this is that every possible fridge configuration uses a unique formula determined by efficiency variables, the refrigerator’s adjusted volume, and expected base energy consumption.

For example, Class 3 Refrigerators have a top-mounted freezer, automatic defrost, and don’t include an automatic icemaker. Because the freezer is on top, the appliance’s fan can take advantage of the fact that cold air sinks to pull air from the freezer into the fridge compartment. This type of passive cooling will always be more efficient than pumping cold air up from a bottom-mounted freezer.

Likewise, the adjusted volume accounts for the freezer compartment, which takes more energy to reach a target temperature than the fresh food compartment. Adjusted volume is always larger than the linear volume of a fridge — at least when the appliance has both a freezer and a refrigerator.

Lastly, all of the components of a fridge have a baseline energy level (base load) determined by the laws of physics. Since fridges can’t use less than this much energy, it’s added to the final calculation:

(Efficiency variable X Adjusted Volume) + Base Load = Maximum Allowable Energy Use

Once you realize that nearly everything — from defrost type to freezer location to built-in versus freestanding — affects efficiency, it makes sense that there are 42 classes of fridges and freezers with different energy efficiency standards.

Energy Star criteria are more straightforward

Energy Star acceptable logos to watch for.

Energy Star has several ratings for home appliances.

Energy Star

It’s much easier to calculate the energy level a fridge needs to qualify for an Energy Star Certification. It simply needs to use 10% less energy than the federal standard — I excluded modern fridges that fall below this threshold. The last wrinkle is the Energy Star Most Efficient status, which changes every year. Here are the 2025 standards (PDF):

  • Top-mounted freezers must have an annual energy consumption of 637 kWh or less.
  • Bottom-mounted freezers and side-by-side units must be at least 27% more efficient than the federal standard.
  • Compact refrigerators must be at least 30% more efficient than the federal standard.

Once I figured out the calculations for each fridge class, it was simply a matter of adding the formulas to my spreadsheet, calculating average energy costs and determining the savings.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Front End Technologies – Table of Content

You will get several search results whenever you search for any specific topic over the internet. Among them, you will go with user-friendly websites that are attractive and easy to use. Moreover, the attractive web pages we browse online result from front-end development. The front-end development includes the creation of attractive user interfaces. It helps users interact with and use the web application directly to find information.

However, front-end development is quite difficult for developers as it requires continuous updates with the inception of new tools and technologies. Hence, the developer needs to update and improve with every new release of the technologies.

This blog will teach you about the various front-end technologies and their pros and cons. But before you dive into this blog, you should grasp the basic idea of front-end development.

What is Front End Development?

Front-end development is the crucial part of web development that deals with the user interface and user experience of a website/application. It makes the website or application visible to the end user. Also, front-end development involves creating attractive visual elements that users interact with. These include menus, buttons, GUI components, images, forms, etc. Moreover, the front-end view is simply the website we see, which includes our interaction with the web and its various actions.

Many developers use the best front-end development languages that give the website attractive looks and designs, such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Further, the front-end developers make the web app or website more responsive and mobile-friendly so that it fits best to different screen sizes and devices.

Front-end developers also ensure that the website or web application is responsive and mobile-friendly, which can adapt to different screen sizes and devices. Also, they look after the performance optimation of the website, which helps in faster loading and ensures smooth interactions.

Front End Technologies

Front-end technologies include languages, frameworks, tools, and libraries to build attractive web pages or apps. To become a front-end developer, you must know the following list of the most trending and highly useful front-end technologies.

  • HTML5 Boilerplate
  • CSS
  • React.Js
  • Angular.Js
  • Vue.Js
  • Bootstrap
  • JavaScript
  • Flutter
  • NPM
  • GraphQL

HTML5 Boilerplate

HTML5 Boilerplate is the most popular among the leading front-end technologies list. It offers a front-end template that allows developers to create fast, adaptable, and robust websites/apps. Moreover, HTML5 is a markup language that helps to build a document displayed over multiple web browsers without any issues.

Pros

  • HTML5 Boilerplate is a popular professional front-end template that offers a vast set of documentation.
  • It helps developers build faster, more adaptable, and more robust web apps and websites.
  • It allows web developers/designers to use clean and improved code.
  • HTML5 comes with rich media elements that support audio and video features.
  • It offers short and simple syntax that is highly smart and has great security.

Cons

  • It doesn’t support old browsers like IE.
  • Less security to local storage.
  • Client-side rendering.

Do you want to collaborate in the Nuget world? Begin by learning Nuget Training!

React JS Training

  • Master Your Craft
  • Lifetime LMS & Faculty Access
  • 24/7 online expert support
  • Real-world & Project Based Learning

CSS

CSS, or Cascading Style Sheet, is another top one of the top front-end technologies. It adds additional styling and presentation to the earlier-developed HTML document. It helps to manage the visual details of the web page, such as fonts, colours, layout, etc., to make it look good across screen sizes. Further, it also makes your web pages more responsive.

Pros

  • CSS can be applied to multiple sites consistently.
  • A specific CSS style can be applied automatically multiple times.
  • It also minimizes the file size while transferring.
  • Moreover, it helps users to customize the online page easily.
  • Provides better maintenance and time-saving.

Cons

  • Less Security.
  • It comes in different levels, such as CSS 1 to CSS 3, confusing developers and browsers.
  • Cross-browser issues while using.

React.Js

React is one of the popular front-end technologies and a JavaScript library. It is useful in developing user interfaces and UI components. Many popular global companies and social platforms like Facebook and Instagram use React in thier web development. Also, it helps developers to build web apps quickly.

Pros

  • It is very simple to use and easy to learn for developers with basic JavaScript skills.
  • React Js offers high reusability that helps reduce development time and improve efficiency.
  • It has vast community support.
  • React offers a high-level developer experience, allowing developers to build fast and highly scalable user interfaces.
  • Makes template designing much easier and supports cross-platform.

Cons

  • It is not beginner-friendly, thus making it difficult to set up and configure.
  • It may need additional support from libraries and frameworks when dealing with more complex tasks.
  • There is a lack of proper documentation.

Take your career to next level in React JS with HKR. Enroll now to get React JS Training !

Angular.Js

Angular or AngularJs is one of the leading front-end technologies with a TypeScript-based framework with open-source availability. It is the most popular front-end development language that helps to build mobile and web apps much more attractive. Further, Angular offers MVC design and supports various platforms.

Pros

  • It is not browser-specific and supports almost all browsers and mobile devices too.
  • Since it is an open-source framework, learning and implementing the language is very easy.
  • It provides multiple features to develop web apps, including data binding, form validation, etc.
  • Angular has a large and active community to offer support.
  • Many large global companies adopted Angular.

Cons

  • It is difficult for beginners to learn.
  • It has a steep learning curve.
  • Compared to the new frameworks React and VueJs, its popularity declined.

Want to learn more about Angular js, Enroll with HKR Trainings Latest Angular js Online Training !

Generals, front-end-technologies-description-0, Generals, front-end-technologies-description-1

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to get new updates..!

Vue.Js

Vue.js is a popular JavaScript framework and front-end technology requiring HTML and CSS skills. It is primarily useful to develop SPAs (Single Page Apps) and UIs, including lightweight UI elements. Moreover, the functions of Vue.js are readily accessible, which helps coders to name these functions as per need.

Pros

  • Vue.js is a lightweight framework and easy to use, especially for beginners.
  • It provides a high level of awareness that makes it easy for developers to build complex UIs.
  • Moreover, the Vue framework has a vast community that supports developers well.
  • It helps developers to complete small projects much more quickly.
  • It is very simple to understand, which makes it easier for developers.

Cons

  • There is no active community of developers to support it as it’s a new front-end development language.
  • Its over-flexibility is the major barrier for large projects where using it may lead to many errors in the project.
  • There is limited support for plugins as it is a new language and is still in its initial stage.

Bootstrap

It is one of the top front-end technologies and CSS frameworks with open-source availability. It helps to develop responsive and mobile-first web pages. Further, it includes various templates based on HTML and CSS. Also, it helps developers build websites much faster without coding from scratch.

Pros

  • It supports all browsers.
  • It is highly responsive and automatically resizes the design to fit the webpage.
  • Bootstrap helps to resize images and other elements automatically.
  • It comes with pre-built templates and components that help to reduce development time and cost.
  • Moreover, it has a large community of developers that actively contributes towards its development and support.

Cons

  • Its large file size makes the page loading time much longer when the internet speed is slower.
  • It is not compliant with HTML.
  • It has limited flexibility due to pre-build components that can limit the freedom to make creative designs.

Take your career to next level in Grunt with HKR. Enroll now to get Grunt Training !

JavaScript

JavaScript is a top front-end development language that dynamically allows developers to alter website content, like images, multimedia, etc. It is a high-level language to develop interactive web apps. Further, it is a simplified language with object-oriented features.

Pros

  • It is highly compatible with cross-platforms, such as browsers and OS.
  • JavaScript’s large active community contributes well.
  • It is a universal language useful for both front-end and back-end.
  • Moreover, it is very easy to learn the language due to its simple-to-understand syntax.

Cons

  • It can behave differently on multiple web browsers due to the complexity of writing cross-platform compatible code.
  • JavaScript is a loosely typed language.
  • It lacks strong security, so it can be used to execute malicious code.

React JS Training

Weekday / Weekend Batches

Flutter

Flutter is also a popular front-end UI development framework with open-source availability. It allows developers to build many smooth-running mobile apps that support various platforms. Moreover, it can build expressive elements on the platforms like Android and iOS, which increases its popularity.

Pros

  • Its hot reload feature allows developers to build applications much faster.
  • Flutter offers a rich set of highly attractive, intuitive, and customizable UI that allows developers to build responsive UI easily.
  • It also delivers higher performance by using a reactive coding model.
  • Flutter has the support of a growing developers’ community worldwide who contribute well.
  • Flutter’s huge library makes it easier to create apps without writing lengthy codes.

Cons

  • Flutter is a relatively new technology and has a steep learning curve.
  • It has limited third-party integrations.
  • There can be debugging issues as Flutter doesn’t offer any debugging tools.

Wish to make a career in the world of Flutter? Start with HKR’S Flutter Training !

NPM

NPM refers to Node Package Manager, which is a JavaScript-based coding language and one of the front-end technologies. It allows developers to install and use many third-party libraries and tools easily. Moreover, it is one of the most highly used web development tools.

Pros

  • NPM makes it easier for developers to install and manage various packages through a CLI interface with quick downloads and installations.
  • It allows its developers access to a wide range of tools and libraries with its large ecosystem.
  • Developers are allowed to customize the packages as per needs.
  • Due to open-source availability, developers of NPM can contribute well towards the development of the tool.

Cons

  • Developers must be very cautious while installing NPM packages as they can contain malicious code.
  • It is not beginner friendly, which makes it complex to use.
  • The large file size can be an issue for applications and their performance.

GraphQL

GraphQL is a popular open-source manipulation coding language for APIs developed by Facebook. It is neither front-end nor back-end. It gets the request and reverts to only the specific data requested in the JSON form.

Pros

  • It is strongly typed language.
  • GraphQL is a highly efficient and very flexible language.
  • It uses simple syntax that makes developers start with it easily and quickly.
  • It offers many tools and libraries that make it easier to use.

Cons

  • Very complex to set up and maintain.
  • Due to dynamic requests, caching can be an issue.

Conclusion
Thus, these are some of the various front-end technologies useful for different purposes for developers. Apart from these, there are many useful front-end technologies such as Remix, ThreeJS, React Native, Next.js, etc. We hope you got an overall idea of the front-end technologies. Stay tuned to get informative blogs in this space.

Related Article:

frontend vs backend



Source link