Proton Sets Its Sights on Big Tech With a New Office Suite and Video Conferencing App


Is there life after Microsoft, Google and Zoom? Proton says yes. The Swiss company on Tuesday launched Workspace, an office suite that puts all of its “privacy-first services,” including VPN, email, document creation and a new video conferencing tool, under one roof.

The company said it’s a way for businesses to “break free from Big Tech dependency and take back complete control of their data.” Workspace is an alternative to Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, which also have the same kinds of software tools, but which use customer data for various purposes.

The introduction of Proton Workspace comes nearly four years after the launch of Proton Unlimited, a subscription bundle that includes VPN, email and document creation tools, but which is cheaper and designed more for non-business consumers.

Although Microsoft and Google dominate the office software market — accounting for more than 95% combined globally — there are more and more alternatives. LibreOffice is free (and we liked it), and there is also Zoho, OnlyOffice, FreeOffice and CryptPad, to name a few. Proton founder and CEO Andy Yen said businesses are leaning more toward adopting “ecosystems” rather than individual products and services.

“We’re hearing more from customers, particularly those wary of Big Tech’s data practices, that they want a secure, bundled alternative that matches the ease of migration and integration of Google or Microsoft, but without the privacy trade-offs,” Yen said in a news release.

What’s in Proton Workspace

There are two versions of Proton Workspace. The Standard suite includes Proton Mail, Calendar, Drive, Docs and Sheets, Meet (video conferencing), VPN and Pass (password manager) and costs $15 per user per month (paying monthly) or $156 a year per user, which saves you about $2 a month per user versus a monthly subscription. The annual plan breaks down to $13 per user per month, paid annually. The Premium version includes the Standard features but also expanded storage, email data retention policies, higher participant limits per Meet call and Lumo — an AI assistant — and costs $240 per user annually or $25 per user monthly.

CNET senior editor Moe Long has checked out a lot of Proton software and says they’re a solid alternative to Google and Microsoft for the average person. He said he will try the free version of Proton Meet, which the company also launched on Tuesday.

“I appreciate the focus on privacy and transparency that doesn’t sacrifice usability,” Long said. “Proton’s roster of apps offers an alternative to Google and Microsoft for the average person. As I’m personally striving to move away from Big Tech as much as possible, Proton has a compelling smorgasbord of tools, from its VPN and password manager to its Gmail and Google Drive alternative, that has a lot of potential.”

Although Workspace is a new umbrella name for Proton’s office suite, most of the tools were already in existence, including its email, cloud storage, password manager and VPN (which CNET reviewed). 

Proton Meet

Proton says its new video conferencing software Meet has end-to-end encryption.

Proton

The main newcomer to the party is Proton Meet, which allows for encrypted and secure video conferencing. The company said Meet doesn’t require a sign-in, even for those who don’t have a Proton account, and meeting appointments can be integrated with Microsoft or Google calendars.

Proton said Workspace tools have end-to-end encryption and zero‑access encryption, so the company doesn’t have access to your data — and neither can a hacker. Proton also said that, as a Europe-based company, it can’t be forced to hand over data to the US government via the US CLOUD Act. Proton also said it doesn’t use customer data for AI training.

What about Proton Unlimited?

For non-business consumers, Proton Unlimited might be a better option. Unlimited gives you access to Proton MailVPNCalendarDrivePass and Wallet. You can also use the free version of Meet, although there are limits on call duration (1 hour) and participants (50). Likewise, you can access the free version of Proton’s AI chatbot, Lumo, but a Plus plan costs you $13 per month per user or $120 a year per user.

Proton Unlimited costs $120 a year.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


What is Podman

Podman is a Linux indigenous open-source tool for creating, managing, and running containers and pods that adhere to the “Open Container Initiative (OCI)” specifications. Podman is the primary container processor in RedHat 8 and CentOS 8. It is touted as a convenient container arranger built by Red Hat.

It’s one of a group of command-line utilities that may be used as a modular structure to manage various aspects of the containerization procedure. This collection comprises the following items:

  • Podman is a container images manager that manages pods.
  • Buildah is a container manufacturer.
  • Skopeo is an image examination manager for containers.
  • To Podman and Buildah, Runc is a container runner and functionality builder.
  • Crun is an extended runtime for rootless containers that provides more adaptability, control, and safety.

What is Docker

Docker is the industry norm for container management. Docker is so well-known in the business that generally when anyone thinks about containers, their mind goes straight to Docker.

Docker has various subsidiary products under its umbrella which manage all aspects of container management, from capacity balancing to networking, earning it the right to be the industry’s first choice as well as the de-facto standard. 

Check out  the video What is Docker? and Explain It?.

Differences between Podman and Docker

Some of the major distinctions between Podman and Docker are as follows:

1. Safety :

Containers can have non-root rights with Podman. Containers without root privileges are thought to be more secure than containers with root capabilities. Because daemons in Docker have root rights, they are the ideal pathway for attackers. By default, Podman containers don’t have such root access, creating a suitable wall separating root and rootless tiers thereby, boosting security.

2. Architecture :

Docker creates images and runs containers using a daemon, which is a background program that runs in the backdrop. Podman features a daemon-less design, which indicates that it can execute containers without requiring the user to start them. The client-server logic of Docker is bridged by a daemon; Podman doesn’t really require the mediator.

3. Systemd :

Podman requires an additional tool to oversee services and enable running containers in the backend without a daemon. Systemd generates or builds controllers for current containers. Systemd could also be merged with Podman, permitting it to execute containers by default with systemd activated. Because most apps are now solely packaged and supplied in this manner, suppliers can use systemd to install, operate, and control their apps as containers.

4. Docker Swarm :

Because Podman doesn’t quite support Docker Swarm, it may be out of the question for projects that require this capability, as running Docker Swarm instructions will result in an error. To overcome this constraint, Podman recently introduced compatibility for Docker Compose to render it Swarm friendly. Docker, of course, plays well with Swarm.

5. Root Privileges :

Because it lacks a daemon to handle its operations, Podman also grants root capabilities to its containers. Although Docker just introduced the rootless option to its daemon setup, Podman was the first to adopt it and market it as a core feature.

6. Building Images :

Docker is a self-contained tool that can create container images by itself. Podman takes the help of a second program known as Buildah, which illustrates its specialized nature: it is designed to manage but not to create containers.

7. All-in-one vs Modular :

Perhaps this is the key distinction between the two technologies: Docker is a massive, robust, standalone technology that handles all container orchestration tasks all through their cycle, with all the pros and cons that entails. Podman works in a decentralized manner, relying on specialized tools for certain tasks.

Become a Docker Certified professional by learning this Docker Training !

Docker Training

  • Master Your Craft
  • Lifetime LMS & Faculty Access
  • 24/7 online expert support
  • Real-world & Project Based Learning

Podman vs Docker: Can They Work Together

Podman is marketed as the simplest and most effective alternative to Docker, with users being able to simply proxy Docker to Podman with no issues.

Is Podman a Docker substitute?

If you’re starting afresh, Podman could be a good choice for containerization technologies. It relies on the details, if the project is underway and currently uses Docker, and it may not be worthy of the time and effort. As a Linux native program, it necessitates Linux knowledge from the programmers.

Developers can use both solutions in tandem by using Docker during creation and then pushing the program to Podman in runtime scenarios to take advantage of the enhanced security. Compatibility would not be an issue because they’re both OCI-compatible.

Is it possible for Docker and Podman to coexist? 

Yes, and in a very good way. Docker and Podman have been used in unison by many programmers to develop safer, more effective, more agile solutions. They have a great deal in common, thus switching from Docker to Podman or combining the two is simple.

Podman vs Docker: How to Choose

You may go with Docker if:

  • A well-documented instrument is more appealing to you. Docker has the advantage of being more widely used than Podman. Because there is so much Docker-related information available online, surfing the web can help you solve a lot of problems.
  • You’ll require assistance with container orchestration. Another key feature of Docker is assistance for Docker Swarms. Users who would like to orchestrate Podman containers must either use less feature-rich alternatives like Docker Swarm or plunge into Kubernetes, which has a significant training curve and it might be too complicated for simple applications.

And, you should go with Podman if:

  • You place a strong emphasis on safety. The design of Podman is fundamentally more reliable than that of Docker.
  • You intend to migrate to Kubernetes in the future. Podman explains the pod concept, making it a good place to start learning Kubernetes.

Because both Podman and Docker are OCI compatible, they can be used simultaneously. Docker’s sturdiness, for example, may be used on development machines, whereas Podman’s greater security can enhance dev, int, and prod settings.

Advantages of Podman

There are various advantages to using Podman, some of which are:

  • Contrary to Docker, it doesn’t need a daemon.
  • It allows you to regulate the container’s levels.
  • Rather than using the client/server model, it employs the fork/exec framework for containers.
  • It allows you to execute containers as a non-root client, eliminating the need to grant a user root access to the host, making it more secure than
  • Docker. This varies from the client/server model, in which launching a container requires opening a socket to a restricted daemon operating as root.
  • Pods are a useful feature for container management. This makes Podman a good way to get started with Kubernetes.
  • Docker users will find it simple to switch to Podman due to the same syntax.

Advantages of Docker

Some of the advantages affiliated with using Docker are :

  • The first benefit of Dockers is the return on investment. The approach is only superior if it can cut down expenses while increasing profits, particularly for big, established organizations that need to create consistent revenues over the foreseeable future.
  • It has the ability to reduce deployment time to seconds. It’s because it can build a container for any process and doesn’t even boot an operating system.
  • One of Docker’s main advantages is the way it streamlines things. It allows customers to pick their personal configuration, includes it into the script, and launch it without difficulty.
  • We may create a container image utilizing the aid of Docker and then use that image throughout the entire release process.
  • When it relates to Agile Development, Docker functions seamlessly with tools like Wercker, Travis, and Jenkins as an element of the pipeline. Each time the program code is modified, these instruments can store the latest edition as a Docker image, which we can subsequently label with a unique id, upload to Docker Hub, and launch to production.

Top 30 frequently asked Docker Interview Questions !

HKR Trainings Logo

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to get new updates..!

Disadvantages of Podman

Like every other tool, Podman too is not without its own set of disadvantages :

  • Owing to the unavailability of compatibility for Docker Swarm, Podman customers must look for other options, such as Nomad.
  • Podman does not provide a one-stop container management solution; it requires various additional tools to be fully useful.
  • Podman still lags behind Docker in the context of web assistance, owing to the fact that it is a younger tool.

Disadvantages of Docker

Some of the disadvantages of using Docker are as follows :

  • Docker containers tend to have fewer costs than virtual computers, but they are not 0 overhead. If we do not use containers or virtual tools, we may attain genuine bare-metal velocity by running a program straight on a bare-metal server. Containers, on the other hand, do not run at bare-metal velocities.
  • One big difficulty is that if an application is built to operate in a Docker container on Microsoft, it will not operate on Linux, and vice versa. Virtual machines, on the other hand, are not bound by this restriction.
  • Docker is mostly used to host apps that execute in the command prompt. Though there are a few methods (such as X11 forwarding) for running a graphic user interface within a Docker container, this is inconvenient.

Become a Docker Certified professional by learning this Docker Training in Chennai !

Docker Training

Weekday / Weekend Batches

Conclusion

In the age of software engineering employing container mechanization, Docker is perhaps the more popular tool that leverages Kubernetes to enable container management. Docker is compatible with a wide range of platforms, including desktops and mainframe PCs like IBM LinuxONE, and widely used operating systems like Microsoft, Linux, and macOS.

As a result, developers frequently seek out other solutions, and herein comes Podman. Docker, on the other hand, has a range of characteristics that Podman may not always be able to match. However, Podman could be leveraged to build, execute, and post container images to an open container repository such as Docker Hub or quay.io while developing container-based apps on a local machine.

That said, Podman is indeed a newer concept that is still improving, so it might be best to wait and watch until we see widespread community engagement and it grows into a more professional and robust tool. You can certainly experiment with it on the local workstations and learn more about it, but bringing it into your manufacturing systems may take some time.

Relayed Article:

Docker Compose vs Kubernetes



Source link