Sony’s Latest PlayStation Update Sparks DRM Fears: What We Know


PlayStation users online are saying that Sony has added a form of digital rights management in the latest firmware updates for the PS4 and PS5. The changes will reportedly require PlayStation console owners to connect to the internet every 30 days in order to continue playing their digital games. However, it has yet to be confirmed whether this is intentional or just a bug. 

The first sighting of this possible DRM came from Modded Hardware, a homebrew and console modder YouTuber, as first reported by Kotaku on April 25. The creator uploaded a video showing an updated “Information” screen for digital games on the PS4, showing a “Valid Period” that displays a 30-day counter. If the console doesn’t go online to do a license check with Sony’s servers within that time, the report says, the games will not be playable until the console does go online. 

Jonathan Downey, the host of the Spawn Wave YouTube channel, did his own testing on the PS5, as bringing up the “Information” screen on PS5 games didn’t show the same “Valid Period” info as on the PS4.

For his test, in a video uploaded Monday, Downey removed the PS5 CMOS battery, which is the lithium battery on the console’s motherboard that stores data such as the current time and date. With the battery removed, he tried to play a game he had purchased digitally weeks prior, but received a message saying it was not playable. 

There is speculation in the PlayStation homebrew community that the change was a way for Sony to sneak in code that will hamper modders. An online check-in is a common tactic against modded hardware, as it prevents illegally downloaded games from being played on the console unless it connects to the internet, which then begins the process of downloading and installing the latest firmware. 

Sony didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Users on X posted their messages with PlayStation Support agents. It appears these agents offer different explanations, with some declaring the problem a bug and others a feature. PlayStation Support agents, however, are not necessarily the authority on all PlayStation matters, so their answers don’t necessarily represent the entire organization. 





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Apple has secured a major victory for its redesigned smartwatches as per the latest decision from the US International Trade Commission. The federal agency ruled against reinstating an import ban on Apple Watches, allowing the tech giant to continue selling its devices with a reworked blood-oxygen monitoring technology.

The ITC decided to terminate the case and refer to a preliminary ruling from one of its judges in March that claimed that Apple’s redesigned smartwatches don’t infringe on patents held by Masimo, the medical tech company that has long been embroiled in lawsuits surrounding the Apple Watch. Apple thanked the ITC in a statement, adding that “Masimo has waged a relentless legal campaign against Apple and nearly all of its claims have been rejected.” We reached out to Masimo for comment and will update the story when we hear back.

The latest decision could offer some closure to the longstanding legal feud between Masimo and Apple. The patent battle dates back to 2021 with Masimo’s first filing against Apple that requested an import ban on Apple Watches. The ITC ended up ruling that Apple violated Masimo’s patents, resulting in the previous import ban and the Apple Watch maker redesigning the blood-oxygen reading feature in certain models. However, Masimo wasn’t satisfied with this conclusion and sought another import ban on the updated Apple Watch models. Now that the ITC has ruled against that, Masimo is left with the option to appeal the decision with the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

While Masimo may currently be on the losing side of this legal battle, it’s confronting Apple on multiple fronts. In November, a federal jury sided with Masimo and ruled that Apple has to pay $634 million in a separate patent infringement case.



Source link