Supreme Court paves the way for largest-ever drop in Black representation in Congress



Democratic Rep. Cleo Fields is seen with members of the Congressional Black Caucus on Wednesday at the Capitol. Fields represents the Louisiana congressional district at the heart of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on Wednesday to severely weaken the Voting Rights Act.

Democratic Rep. Cleo Fields is seen with members of the Congressional Black Caucus on Wednesday at the Capitol. Fields represents the Louisiana congressional district at the heart of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on Wednesday to severely weaken the Voting Rights Act.
Democratic Rep. Cleo Fields is seen with members of the Congressional Black Caucus on Wednesday at the Capitol. Fields represents the Louisiana congressional district at the heart of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on Wednesday to severely weaken the Voting Rights Act.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP

A historic drop in representation by Black members of Congress may be on the way after the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark decision Wednesday to further weaken the Voting Rights Act.

Now that the high court's conservative majority has reinterpreted longstanding provisions against racial discrimination under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, Republican calls for new rounds of map drawing for the House of Representatives have already begun.

How much of that redistricting can be done in time for this fall's midterm election is unclear, although many states have held or are close to holding congressional primary races.

But in the long run, looking beyond this November, many redistricting experts are expecting Republican-controlled state legislatures in the South to eliminate at least some House districts with sizable racial minority populations currently represented by Black Democrats and that were likely protected under the Supreme Court's previous interpretation of Section 2 provisions.

From Louisiana and eastward to North Carolina, there are at least 15 House districts now at risk of elimination, according to an NPR analysis conducted earlier this year. (That list grows longer if taking into account newly redrawn districts in Missouri and Texas, which were not included in the analysis.)

Exactly how redistricting will play out with an eroded Voting Rights Act is hard to predict. Some Democratic-led states may jump into the fray and consider undoing certain majority-minority districts to spread out their voters and try to pick up additional seats.

And some GOP-led states may decide to keep some of those districts for partisan reasons, as they can keep large numbers of Democratic-leaning voters packed within those lines.

Losing even a handful of those districts, however, could set up the largest-ever decline in the number of Black representatives on Capitol Hill — breaking a record set around the end of the post-Civil War Reconstruction era by the Congress that began in 1877 with four fewer House districts represented by Black lawmakers than the previous session.

Black-represented districts were in the single digits or at zero for a century after the Civil War. But since the passing of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, that number has grown to 63 districts, making up around 14% of the House.

The potential drop in that figure drew a swift rebuke Wednesday from members of the Congressional Black Caucus.

"With this decision in Louisiana v. Callais, the Supreme Court has opened the door to a coordinated attack on Black voters across this country," Democratic Rep. Yvette Clarke of New York, chair of the caucus, said during a press conference hours after the court released its decision. "This is an outright power grab. It's about silencing Black voices, dismantling majority Black districts and rigging the maps so that politicians can choose their voters instead of the other way around."

As part of its reinterpretation of the Voting Rights Act, the court's conservative majority ruled that a Louisiana congressional district crafted to comply with Section 2 was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, and that Section 2 should focus on intentional racial discrimination.

Rep. Terri Sewell, a Democrat from Alabama who has led what has been an uphill push to shore up and expand the Voting Rights Act, said she plans to revise her bill again to "reflect the court cases that have tried to gut" the landmark law.

"Listen, we cannot give up," Sewell said. "We're not going to give up."

In the meantime, however, Atiba Ellis, a law professor and associate dean at Case Western Reserve University, sees the ongoing partisan gerrymandering war between Republicans and Democrats only getting worse with a further weakened Voting Rights Act.

"This could distort politics in Washington substantially by preventing communities of color from genuinely being heard," Ellis says. "I think it highly ironic that under the guise of a colorblind Constitution communities of color in a diversifying America could lose the lion's share of their voice in government."

Edited by Benjamin Swasey

Copyright 2026, NPR



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews



Medically reviewed by Kierra Brown, RD

Canned sardines and anchovies are high in protein and healthy fats, plus they have a long shelf life.Credit: Design by Health; Getty Images
Canned sardines and anchovies are high in protein and healthy fats, plus they have a long shelf life.
Credit: Design by Health; Getty Images
  • The nutritional profiles of anchovies and sardines are very similar.
  • Compared to sardines, anchovies contain slightly more protein and omega-3 healthy fats.
  • However, sardines have higher concentrations of many vitamins and minerals, and usually have less added sodium.

Anchovies and sardines are both small, oily fish that are usually canned or jarred. Despite their similarities, anchovies and sardines do have some nutritional differences when it comes to protein, healthy fats, and micronutrient content.

Which Small Fish Has More Protein?

 While both fish are excellent sources of lean protein, anchovies have a slight edge:

  • Sardines, canned in oil: 6.97 grams in a 1-ounce serving
  • Anchovies, canned in oil: 8.19 grams in a 1-ounce serving

The amount of protein your body needs depends on a number of factors, including age, health status, and physical activity levels.

Healthy adults should consume 1.2-1.6 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight, according to updated federal dietary guidelines.

For example, if someone weighs 70 kilograms (or 155 pounds), they may want to consume at least 84 grams of protein every day. A 1-ounce serving of anchovies canned in oil would get them about 10% of the way toward that daily protein goal.

Protein is critical for cell development and repair, contributing to physical growth and development.

Is One a Better Source of Healthy Fats Like Omega-3s?

When it comes to healthy fats in general, sardines come out on top:

  • Sardines, canned in oil: 2.56 grams of unsaturated fat in a 1-ounce serving
  • Anchovies, canned in oil: 1.8 grams of unsaturated fat in a 1-ounce serving

But if you're looking to boost your levels of omega-3 fatty acids—a specific type of healthy unsaturated fat—anchovies are the better choice. A 1-ounce serving contains 594 milligrams of omega-3s, while the same amount of sardines has 278 milligrams.

Consuming more omega-3s and healthy fats in general may benefit multiple different aspects of your health:

  • Heart health: Omega-3s help reduce levels of triglycerides, or fats in the blood; high triglyceride levels are a risk factor for heart disease and stroke. In general, research has shown that eating unsaturated fats in place of saturated fats—the kind found in full-fat dairy, red meat, and tropical oils—reduces your risk of heart disease.
  • Brain health and cognitive function: Some research suggests that insufficient levels of omega-3s may increase the risk of brain health concerns, including Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and depression. Another study found that omega-3 supplements could improve mild cognitive impairment, a condition that causes memory and thinking issues that can develop into dementia.
  • Eye health: In some studies, people who ate fatty fish (and more omega-3s) had a lower risk of age-related macular degeneration, a condition that can blur vision. Similarly, there's evidence that diets higher in omega-3s could reduce the risk of dry eye disease. However, more research is needed.

How Do They Compare for Vitamin and Mineral Content?

Along with protein and healthy fats, sardines and anchovies are packed with essential micronutrients. However, they contain different amounts of these key vitamins and minerals:

  • Vitamin B12: Sardines have about 10 times more vitamin B12 than anchovies. This B vitamin supports nerve cell function, red blood cell formation, metabolism, and the creation of DNA.
  • Vitamin D: One sardine has the vitamin D content of about eight anchovies. Vitamin D helps the body absorb calcium and supports bone maintenance and growth.
  • Iron: As compared to sardines, anchovies contain about 60% more iron. This mineral helps form red blood cells, supports muscle and tissue function, and more.
  • Phosphorus: Sardines are nearly twice as rich in phosphorous than anchovies are. In fact, a 1-ounce serving of sardines contains about 20% of the daily recommended intake for adults. Phosphorus is key in creating structures in the body, including teeth, DNA, and cell membranes.
  • Calcium: As compared to anchovies, sardines are a better source of calcium, a mineral which helps support and maintain bone health.

Comparing Sardines and Anchovies

Nutritional content always varies based on packaging and other factors, but here's how a typical 1-ounce serving of anchovies compares to a 1-ounce serving of sardines:

Sardines, canned in oil Anchovies, canned in oil
Calories 59 60
Protein 6.97 grams (g) 8.10 g
Total fat 3.23 g 2.75 g
Carbohydrates 0 g 0 g
Calcium 108 milligrams (mg) 65.8 mg
Iron 0.828 mg 1.31 mg
Magnesium 11.1 mg 19.6 mg
Phosphorus 139 mg 71.4 mg
Potassium 113 mg 154 mg
Selenium 14.9 micrograms (mcg) 19.3 mcg
Sodium 87 mg 1,040 mg
Zinc 0.371 mg 0.692 mg
Vitamin B12 2.53 mcg 0.249 mcg
Vitamin D 1.36 mcg 0.482 mcg

In addition to their relatively similar nutritional profiles, sardines and anchovies share many other commonalities.

Both are considered forage fish, and they're often eaten by larger fish or marine mammals. Sardines are a bit bigger—they're 4-12 inches while anchovies are usually 7-8 inches—but both species' relative small size and low position on the food chain ensures they have low mercury levels.

Once they're harvested, anchovies and sardines are usually jarred or canned in water or oil to make them shelf stable. One difference is that canned anchovies are often salt-cured—this gives them a pink color and a salty flavor (as well as high amounts of sodium).

What To Know Before Adding These Small Fish to Your Diet

Anchovies and sardines aren't naturally high in sodium (or salt), but jarred or canned versions often have a lot of salt added.

For instance, a 1-ounce serving of anchovies canned in oil contains 1,040 milligrams of sodium, which is 45% of the recommended daily limit for adults.

Diets high in sodium raise your risk of developing high blood pressure, heart diseases, artery diseases, heart attack, and stroke.

When purchasing canned fish, check the nutrition label and try to find a product that has lower amounts of sodium.

Sardines and anchovies also usually contain bones. The canning process makes these bones safe to eat, though young children and people with swallowing concerns may want to avoid them.



Source link