Billie Eilish SLAMMED After Calling Parents ‘Lazy’ For Sending Their Kids To School Instead Of Homeschooling Them In Resurfaced Clip!


Billie Eilish is in big trouble with fans online after they re-discovered some of her old controversial comments!

For those who don’t know, the singer was homeschooled alongside her older brother Finneas by their mother, Maggie Baird. She has long applauded their upbringing, saying it gave them the freedom to learn and pursue music rather than focus on a traditional curriculum.

Related: Queen Camilla BASHED For Taking Photo With J.K. Rowling During Pride!

Not everyone can have that experience, though, which Billie failed to acknowledge when she slammed parents who send their children to school as “lazy as f**k” in an interview for Pitchfork’s Over/Under series in 2019! Oof! Her comments resurfaced this week, and fans are now PISSED! But what did she fully say? Billie shared that she never went to school:

“I’ve never been to school. I grew up homeschooled, stayed homeschooled, never was not homeschooled. The thing is, I still learned everything, you know? But I learned it in life. I learned how to do math by cooking with my mom and seeing how many halves are gonna make this amount… If we double this recipe, how many more do we have to put in this batch right here? So, that’s how I learned math, and then I learned how to build s**t from my dad.”

The Birds of a Feather artist then bashed parents for going the conventional schooling route:

“I mean, there’s a lot of ways to do it. I think some people do it the wrong way, which just makes your life horrible and miserable and boring. And that’s mainly because parents are lazy as f**k – that’s why they send their kids to school in the first place: ‘I don’t want to teach you, b**ch.’”

Yikes… Watch the interview (below):

When a clip of the interview started circulating again, many stormed the comments to accuse Billie of unfairly judging parents. Others pointed out that many families don’t have the resources or ability to homeschool their kids like her parents. Overall, social media users thought she had a very “privileged” take:

“that’s such a privileged thing to say”

“our parents had to go to work, billie.”

“Maybe the parents are busy working to provide for their kids. That’s the opposite of lazy”

“calling it lazy parenting to send your kid to school is insane lmao”

“Rich kid who never went to real school calling working parents lazy for using the system that actually exists. Tone deaf and immature as hell.”

“parents are lazy asf because they want you to be educated by people who are specifically trained for it…#ok”

“Sooo if parents are supposed to teach their homeschooled kids everything, when do they have time to go to work and provide for the household? This only works if you’re highly privileged already”

“outdated education models should change but ‘parents send kids to school because they are lazy’ is ignorant af [and] diminishing the role of educators and acting like anyone can do that.”

However, others thought Billie had a point! They just didn’t agree with the way she said it!

“Maybe y’all don’t like her delivery but a lot of parents used public school to raise their kids and not just educate them on world affairs and that’s why we have the problems we do now.”

“everyone’s already said dumb s**t when they were underage the difference is that they didn’t have a camera pointed at you”

“Lowkey get her point. She just ain’t say it right.”

“this was years ago so she might have changed her perspective (hopefully).”

Let’s hope! At this time, Billie hasn’t addressed her resurfaced comments. What are YOUR thoughts on the controversy, Perezcious readers? Sound OFF (below)!

[Image via Pitchfork/YouTube, MEGA/WENN]



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews



Waymo — the Alphabet-owned driverless taxi service which has seen a rapid expansion in recent years — is rolling out a new rewards program today. 

The service is called Waymo Premier, and it promises priority pickups along with a 10 percent in-app rebate applied to future rides. Subscribers will also get fee-free cancellations, though only up to five a month. Lastly, Premier gives subscribers the chance to be among the first to use Waymo in new cities as the service expands, which is certainly one way to reframe the concept of paying to beta test those new coverage areas.

The asking price for all of this is $30 a month, and that’s where Waymo Premier feels like it’s jumping the shark. Uber One, the loyalty service for Waymo’s human-driven competitor, is only $10 a month but gets you discounts on hotels, car rentals and food delivery, in addition to 6 percent in-app credits on rides. You even get 10 percent of a car rental cost credited to your Uber account. 

Meanwhile, Lyft offers Lyft Pink, which also costs $10 a month and gets you 5 percent off Standard rides along with free priority pickup. The whole point of eliminating the driver from a taxi service was supposed to be saving on human labor costs, but when you’re putting drivers out of a job and charging the customer three times as much, it’s fair to question where the value of Waymo Premier is hiding.

It’s not as if you’ll offset the inflated price of Waymo Premier by riding with robots, either. As found by rideshare data analytics firm Obi in a June 2025 report, a ride with Waymo is much more expensive on average than the same ride taken with Uber or Lyft. So, you’re paying more for the subscription and more per-ride, all to be carted around by a self-driving system that still needs human intervention from remote workers. It’s not exactly the deal of the century, and you never know when your ride will crush a beloved neighborhood cat to death.

Which brings us to the many, many times Waymo has been in the news for the wrong reasons recently. It’s not that Uber and Lyft are problem-free  — late last year, the New York Times uncovered that Uber allowed violent felons to drive with its platform, not to mention all the sexual assault complaints and lawsuits against the company. There are valid reasons to want no one else in the car with you, especially if you’re a lone woman or a member of a marginalized community. If a bear is preferable to a man, so is a car that might drive directly through a guns-drawn police standoff or flee from police with you inside. But there’s no reason to pay $30 more for the privilege each month on top of the already inflated ride fees, especially when Waymo has had to recall software for its entire fleet as recently as last month following dangerous behavior during a flood in San Antonio, Texas.



Source link