MN Shortlist, April 3–9: Artists rethink how stories are carried



Across galleries, stages and screens, this week’s lineup approaches art as both archive and active system — work that holds history while also testing it against the present. From river clay to protest prints to restructured captions, these projects are less about documentation than about how documentation itself is shaped, translated and put to use.

'[opera captions]' at Nautilus Music Theater in St. Paul — April 3–6

This hybrid performance shifts captions from support to structure, treating accessibility as the core aesthetic choice. Created by Jay Afrisando and directed by Sequoia Hauck, the work brings together music, film and poetry to examine how sound is experienced across hearing differences, with captions functioning as active elements that mediate, interrupt and expand the performance.

Jeremy Jewell at Two Fathoms Brewing in Winona — April 4

Jewell’s work leans on a deliberate informality, a folk-rock sensibility that reads as lived rather than staged. Known for incorporating family into his sets and operating within a distinctly regional DIY framework, he reflects a strand of Minnesota music oriented toward intimacy over polish, where the boundary between performance and everyday life remains intentionally porous.

'Suffs' at Orpheum Theatre in Minneapolis — April 7–12

Arriving with Tony-winning momentum, this touring production revisits the American suffrage movement with attention to both internal conflict and collective achievement. Shaina Taub’s score draws on the structure of the political musical while foregrounding figures such as Alice Paul and Ida B. Wells, and with Minnesota-raised Victoria Pekel in the cast, the production lands as both national history and local connection.

Studio Ghibli Series at The Parkway Theater in Minneapolis — Saturdays in April

The Parkway’s annual Ghibli series operates as both repertory programming and a seasonal recalibration, returning audiences to Hayao Miyazaki’s layered explorations of environment and spirituality. With films like “My Neighbor Totoro” and “Spirited Away,” the run underscores animation’s narrative range and the collective experience of revisiting work that resists urgency in favor of sustained attention.

'Valley Pottery: 2,000 Years And Deep Mapping' at ArtReach St. Croix in Stillwater — Through May 9

A paired exhibition frames the St. Croix River Valley as both archive and ongoing studio, tracing ceramics from ancient Indigenous traditions into contemporary practice. “Valley Pottery: 2,000 Years” brings together archaeological material from the Science Museum of Minnesota with new work by regional potters, while “Deep Mapping” carries that continuity into language and geography through Greg Seitz’s river maps and Marlena Myles’ Dakota cartography.

'Resilience' at Highpoint Center for Printmaking in Minneapolis —Through May 16

Printmaking here functions less as a medium than as a civic tool, with curator Maria Cristina Tavera assembling artists who treat ink and paper as vehicles for response. From Narsiso Martinez’s large-scale tributes to farmworkers to a gallery shaped by protest artifacts connected to Operation Metro Surge, “Resilience” positions the Twin Cities as a site where political urgency and artistic production remain closely aligned.

Taken together, these events return to a shared question: how art carries material forward — through clay, ink, sound or story — without allowing it to resolve into something fixed or inert.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Chalk up a win for creative artists against AI companies. On Wednesday, the UK government abandoned its previous position on copyrighted works. It’s currently working on a data bill that, if unaltered, would have allowed AI companies like Google and OpenAI to train models on copyrighted materials without consent. Artists and other copyright holders would only have been offered a mere opt-out clause.

After significant backlash, the UK backed off from that position. “We have listened,” Technology Secretary Liz Kendall said on Wednesday. However, the government’s new stance is, well, not a stance at all. It currently “no longer has a preferred option” about how to handle the issue.

Still, backpedaling from its previous position is viewed as a win for artists. UK Music CEO Tom Kiehl described the decision as “a major victory,” while promising to work with the government on the next steps.

WEST HOLLYWOOD, CALIFORNIA - MARCH 15: (Exclusive Coverage) (L-R) Elton John and Dua Lipa attend Elton John AIDS Foundation's 34th Annual Academy Awards Viewing Party on March 15, 2026 in West Hollywood, California. (Photo by Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for Elton John AIDS Foundation)

Elton John and Dua Lipa spoke out against the government’s previous stance. (Photo by Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for Elton John AIDS Foundation) (Kevin Mazur via Getty Images)

Last year, some of Britain’s highest-profile artists objected to the government’s position. Sir Elton John and Dua Lipa were among those speaking out. Even Sir Paul McCartney weighed in, warning that the AI industry could “rip off” artists and lead to a “loss of creativity.”

“You get young guys, girls, coming up, and they write a beautiful song, and they don’t own it, and they don’t have anything to do with it,” McCartney told the BBC in 2025. “And anyone who wants can just rip it off. The truth is, the money’s going somewhere… somebody’s getting paid.”

The government will now weigh its options, taking “the time needed” to balance the wishes of artists and the tech industry. “We will not introduce reforms to copyright law until we are confident that they will meet our objectives for the economy and UK citizens,” it wrote in a report. “This means protecting the UK’s position as a creative powerhouse, while unlocking the extraordinary potential of AI to grow the economy and improve lives.”

“Any reform must ensure that right holders can be fairly rewarded for the economic value their work creates, and that they are protected against unlawful and unfair use of their work. It must also ensure that AI developers can access high-quality content.”



Source link