Tim Cook’s Legacy: Turning Apple’s Tech Chic Gadgets Into Status Symbols


In the coming days, a lot will be said about Tim Cook’s legacy at Apple. He expanded the company’s products into new categories like wearables and headphones, debuted a suite of services, developed a strong customer base in China and led the company to a $4 trillion valuation. 

From the moment Cook officially took the CEO position in 2011, he was in the shadow of his predecessor and Apple founder Steve Jobs, whose legacy extended far beyond a lineup of successful products. Jobs’ legacy was being the face of Apple, aggressively pushing for user-oriented design simplicity in the background while singing their praises in the public spotlight. His successor had big shoes to fill and grew the company from a more private vantage, but his legacy is more than just how much Apple is worth. Cook’s lasting impact can also be measured in another way: how much Apple’s products have become status symbols.

I remember my parents buying the 1998 iMac in Bondi Blue, the first major product Steve Jobs released after returning to lead Apple. “There’s no step 3!” came Jeff Goldblum’s voice in a classic commercial summarizing the prodigal CEO’s vision of the company’s products: easy-to-use and chic alternatives to boring beige boxes. This culminated in the white-plastic era of lamp iMacs, MacBooks, iPods and iPhones spearheaded by designer Jony Ive. 

Apple products were cool and big sellers when Cook took over as CEO. But he focused on the iPhone as a new center of the company, using it as a beachhead for its new unified device ecosystem. Once the iPhone was in people’s pockets, iOS’s easy-to-use interface and synergy with MacOS (sharing iMessage from 2012 onward) and WatchOS (with the first Apple Watch in 2015) led them to stick with Apple’s smartphone line. Then their friends did, too, and discovered that their text conversations fell into two camps: blue with other iPhone owners, or green with Android owners.

Four people sit in the Code Conference's iconic red chairs to discuss Steve Jobs

At Code 2022, Recode’s Kara Swisher led a roundtable memorial for Steve Jobs featuring Jony Ive, Laurene Powell Jobs and Tim Cook.

David Lumb / CNET

In 2017, the iPhone X rang in a new era of home-buttonless, all-screen-front handset design and, subsequently, higher prices — the first time it neared four figures (though cleverly priced at $999). Soon, more iMessage features expanded the divide between those paying more money for iPhones and those often paying less for Android devices. This has led to social stigma for those sending “green bubble” chats. Apple was in no rush to bridge this gap, and at Code 2022, I watched as Cook himself told a fan to “buy your mom an iPhone.” 

Apple has somewhat bowed to pressure on this issue, adding some extra messaging functionality between iPhones and Android devices when it incorporated the data-based RCS messaging standard into its handsets back in 2024. But the stigma persists, and iPhones have continued to enjoy social superiority in many markets. That’s undoubtedly contributed to iPhone sales over the years, ensuring Apple’s phones remain the company’s highest-selling devices by a long shot. 

If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, Cook’s era has seen many products come out that openly resemble Apple products to coast on their credibility. From the Huawei Matebook X of 2017 to the HP Dragonfly Pro of 2023, plenty of laptop makers ape Apple’s sleek silver MacBook aesthetics. And considering all the phones I saw at MWC looking like dead ringers for the iPhone 17 Pro down to its signature orange hue, iPhone envy is alive and well. 

gettyimages-455053622.jpg

CEO Tim Cook and Bono of the band U2.

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Tim Cook rings in the celebrity era of Apple

Jobs dabbled in using musicians to promote Apple products, like the iPod, but the closest he got to using celebrities was when he brought the actor Noah Wyle on stage at Macworld 1999, giving a faux-Jobs speech (Wyle had just portrayed him in the film Pirates of Silicon Valley earlier that year). 

The Tim Cook era is when Apple launches began openly featuring celebrities, and nothing says status like a famous person using your product. To be fair, Apple isn’t alone among tech companies in doing this, but other examples certainly feel more stilted, like when Jimmy Fallon helped debut the Pixel 10, or when Samsung unveiled the Z Fold 6 and Sydney Sweeney was also there

Cook oversaw an embrace of celebrities as pseudo-brand ambassadors. It started with a stumble in 2014 when Apple shoved a U2 album into every iPhone, a wildly unpopular move the company quickly recovered from with its first new product in the new era. Back before the Apple Watch launched in 2015, the company seemingly seeded the device out to Beyonce, Katy Perry, Drake, Pharrell Williams and others to flaunt on social media, cultivating prerelease hype and a luxury association for a tech gadget. 

apple-tvplus-class-photo-hero-crop

Apple TV Plus talent join CEO Tim Cook in the lobby of the Steve Jobs Theater. 

Art Streiber/Apple

Then at the grand unveiling of Apple TV Plus in March 2019, a laundry list of Hollywood’s top stars were either featured in the presentation or appeared in the audience to signal their involvement in shows and films to come, including Steven Speilberg, Ron Howard, Reese Witherspoon, Jennifer Aniston, Steve Carell, Chris Evans, Jason Momoa, M. Night Shyamalan, Octavia Spencer, Hailee Steinfeld, Jane Krakowski, Kumail Nanjiani and more. Cook himself brought Oprah on stage to cap off the event. 

Cook has savvily adapted his product launch invite list to bring on more current celebrities who made their mark on social media and streaming. In recent years, he’s set up interviews at Apple events with popular streamers like Marques Brownlee (MKBHD) and iJustine at WWDC 2025, as well as at a secret Grand Central Terminal, NYC event for Apple’s 50th anniversary. Last year, after the iPhone 17 series was introduced, he walked to the demo floor to show off the iPhone Air to Mr. Beast.

But to properly honor 50 years of Apple, Cook brought in one of the greatest living musical legends, Paul McCartney, to mark the company’s half-century. 

Cook’s tenure at Apple may be coming to a close, but he’s shown a keen sense for how to make owning an iPhone or MacBook a measure of status. And by turning launch events into celebrity-studded product galas, he’s ensured the company itself is seen as a global symbol of high-end products. How else do you get a Beatle to celebrate your birthday?





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Lululemon clothing is being investigated for PFAS.Credit: winhorse / Getty Images
Lululemon clothing is being investigated for PFAS.
Credit: winhorse / Getty Images
  • The Texas attorney general is investigating whether Lululemon clothing contains PFAS, commonly known as “forever chemicals.”
  • PFAS are widely used for stain- and water-resistant products, but their long-term health effects are still not fully understood.
  • Experts say exposure from clothing is likely low, but there are some signs to tell if your clothes contain PFAS.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced Monday that his office is launching an investigation into whether clothing from the athleisure brand Lululemon contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), long-lasting compounds commonly referred to as “forever chemicals.” The investigation has thrust these chemicals—linked to a range of negative health outcomes and used in a variety of products—into the spotlight. Here’s what to know about the Lululemon probe, PFAS, and what it could mean for your health if these compounds are lurking in your clothing.

What's the Investigation About, Exactly?

According to a press release from Paxton’s office, the investigation will examine whether Lululemon’s clothing contains PFAS "that their health-conscious customers would not expect based on the brand’s marketing.” The office “will also review the company’s Restricted Substances List, testing protocols, and supply chain practices to determine whether Lululemon’s products comply with its stated safety standards,” the release continued.

Per the release, the allegations stem from "emerging research and consumer concerns."

Lululemon, meanwhile, denied using PFAS in its apparel, which includes leggings, workout tops, and casual athleisure wear. In an email to Health, a company spokesperson said: 

"The company phased out the substance in FY23, which had been used in durable water repellent products, a small percentage of our assortment. The health and safety of our guests is paramount, and our products meet or exceed global regulatory, safety, and quality standards. We require all our vendors to regularly conduct testing for restricted substances, including PFAS, by credible third-party agencies to confirm ongoing compliance.”

What Are PFAS?

PFAS is an umbrella term for a class of chemical compounds used in a wide range of everyday products, including furniture, carpets, paint, food packaging, and clothing. They’re often added to fabrics for their stain-resistant or water-repellant properties, said Alex LeBeau, Ph.D., MPH, CIH, a toxicologist, certified industrial hygienist, and owner of Exposure Consulting in Orlando, Florida.

These compounds—which number in the thousands—have been dubbed “forever chemicals” because they don’t break down easily and have been discovered in soil, air, water, and in animals. They’ve been found in humans, too. Nearly everyone in the U.S. has measurable amounts of PFAS in their blood, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

How Harmful Are PFAS?

Scientists still don’t fully know how PFAS affect human health. The chemicals can be particularly challenging to study because the category includes thousands of compounds, products contain varying levels, and exposure can come from many sources.

Two of the most widely studied PFAS—PFOS and PFOA—were phased out in the U.S. in the 2010s, LeBeau said. Those long-chain PFAS, which tend to accumulate in the body and stick around for longer, were largely replaced with short-chain alternatives, which are thought to be less bioaccumulative but may still raise health concerns.

Much of the research into PFAS has focused on what happens when people ingest them through water or food. A 2025 study found a link between PFAS in drinking water and increased incidence of digestive, endocrine, respiratory, and oral cancers. Still, LeBeau said that overall, “the health impacts are still up for debate in the scientific community.” Many human studies have produced mixed results, and much of the existing research has been conducted in animals.  

While it’s possible for PFAS to be absorbed through the skin from clothing, LeBeau said it’s not considered as concerning as ingesting the chemicals. “Dermal PFAS uptake does not appear to be a concerning PFAS exposure route into the body,” he said. “Limited animal studies have suggested that PFAS may permeate the skin, but skin impact may also depend on the PFAS chemical form.”

How to Know If Your Clothing Contains PFAS

There is no federal law requiring clothing manufacturers to stop using PFAS or disclose whether their products contain them. Although, some states have banned their use in apparel and other products, and many well-known brands have said they are voluntarily phasing them out—including Lululemon. 

While LeBeau said people should be most concerned about PFAS in their food and water, it's understandable to want to avoid potentially harmful chemicals altogether. Unfortunately, it's not always easy to tell whether clothing contains PFAS—but there are a few clues.

One is if a garment is labeled as being made with GORE-TEX or Teflon, both of which are PFAS-based materials. Clothing marketed as moisture-wicking, waterproof or water-repellant, or stain-resistant is also more likely to contain PFAS. It’s also a good sign if a brand explicitly labels a product or line as PFAS-free and that claim has been verified through third-party testing.



Source link