I’m Calling It: The Elden Ring Movie Will Live Up to the Mario Movies’ Successes


As a gamer, I’m enjoying the current renaissance of video game adaptations. Whether it’s the new 3D-animated Super Mario Galaxy Movie or Sonic movies or award-winning TV series like The Last of Us, Fallout and Cyberpunk: Edgerunners, Hollywood is now filled with creators who are actually fans of the games they’re adapting, a shift from the 1990s when licenses were often purchased just to cash in on younger audiences. 

On Monday, A24 revealed the cast of the live-action adaptation of the Elden Ring movie, which will be directed by Alex Garland (Civil War, Annihilation) and released on March 3, 2028. While this looks promising on paper, it’s hard to ignore the scale of the challenge to adapt a game known for its personality-less protagonist, cryptic lore and multiple endings. Still, there is reason to believe this could become one of the most successful video game adaptations.

To start, A24, the studio behind the production, is known for acclaimed films such as The Brutalist, Moonlight and Everything Everywhere All at Once — all very different films following unique, humanistic visions. While the studio typically produces smaller films with budgets under $50 million, the Elden Ring movie is reportedly set to exceed a $100 million budget.

Filming is already underway, and leaked set photos show what appears to be an almost perfect recreation of locations and scenes from the game. On Wednesday, a video uploaded to YouTube showed a crowd cheering during the hanging of a character known as the Dung Eater, closely mirroring a moment from the game’s opening intro cinematic.

Watching that short clip of a character who isn’t central to the story, yet is depicted with such accuracy, is astonishing. My biggest concern, though, is Elden Ring’s story. Unlike some other adaptations in development, such as Death Stranding, The Legend of Zelda and Resident Evil, Elden Ring is just one game with one DLC (Shadow of the Erdtree) and one multiplayer spinoff (Nightreign). That’s it.

Even so, developer FromSoftware packs an immense amount of lore into the game, though not in the traditional sense through dialogue or readable documents. Instead, as in its other titles, the studio distributes background details about characters and the world through descriptions of items, weapons, armor and spells.

This approach to world-building, which FromSoftware first used in 2009’s Demon’s Souls, is like a jigsaw puzzle. But instead of assembling pieces to form a picture, it’s about taking two or three sentences and building an entire book. Literally, fans who create YouTube videos about the game’s lore are now publishing a 400-page book.

Not only is there a vast amount of lore to dig into, the Elden Ring’s sheer scope is immense. The game’s main story follows the player character’s journey to become an Elden Lord in the Lands Between, a god over mysterious undying lands. That quest is shaped by wars and betrayals that occurred long before the events of the game. It unfolds like a season of Game of Thrones, which is fitting given that George R. R. Martin helped develop Elden Ring’s story.

Fortunately, there’s hope that director Alex Garland understands the assignment when it comes to adapting Elden Ring. Unlike earlier video game adaptations, where screenwriters were often tasked with making sense of stories from games they hadn’t played and forcing them into a 90-minute structure, this production is being led by a fan of the game.

New Yorker article about A24 last year recounted an anecdote involving Garland and Noah Sacco, the studio’s head of film. Sacco visited Garland, who had been enthusiastic about the game, and proposed a film adaptation. Sacco approved the idea, and Garland went on to write a 200-page script that includes 40 pages of visuals. The two later traveled to Japan to seek approval from the game’s director, Hidetaka Miyazaki. Miyazaki was reportedly impressed with Garland’s knowledge of the game, which came from completing it at least seven times — a sizable feat considering it takes 60 hours or more to beat.

We still don’t know which time period the Elden Ring movie will explore. One assumption is that it could serve as a prequel, focusing on the Shattering, the in-game historical event that set the stage for the game’s present-day story. Extensive lore surrounds those events, and because FromSoftware leaves many details open to interpretation, there’s room for Garland to develop a compelling narrative while staying true to the source material.

Looking at all the elements of this production, the pieces are in place for a successful film. An award-winning studio is making one of its largest investments in a video game adaptation, led by a director who is a devoted fan. He has the approval of the game’s creator, who was not quick to grant licensing rights, and Martin is also involved as a producer. The Elden Ring movie has the potential to be not just a worthy adaptation, but one of the best video game adaptations ever made.

At least, that’s the hope.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews



Medically reviewed by Kierra Brown, RD

Canned sardines and anchovies are high in protein and healthy fats, plus they have a long shelf life.Credit: Design by Health; Getty Images
Canned sardines and anchovies are high in protein and healthy fats, plus they have a long shelf life.
Credit: Design by Health; Getty Images
  • The nutritional profiles of anchovies and sardines are very similar.
  • Compared to sardines, anchovies contain slightly more protein and omega-3 healthy fats.
  • However, sardines have higher concentrations of many vitamins and minerals, and usually have less added sodium.

Anchovies and sardines are both small, oily fish that are usually canned or jarred. Despite their similarities, anchovies and sardines do have some nutritional differences when it comes to protein, healthy fats, and micronutrient content.

Which Small Fish Has More Protein?

 While both fish are excellent sources of lean protein, anchovies have a slight edge:

  • Sardines, canned in oil: 6.97 grams in a 1-ounce serving
  • Anchovies, canned in oil: 8.19 grams in a 1-ounce serving

The amount of protein your body needs depends on a number of factors, including age, health status, and physical activity levels.

Healthy adults should consume 1.2-1.6 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight, according to updated federal dietary guidelines.

For example, if someone weighs 70 kilograms (or 155 pounds), they may want to consume at least 84 grams of protein every day. A 1-ounce serving of anchovies canned in oil would get them about 10% of the way toward that daily protein goal.

Protein is critical for cell development and repair, contributing to physical growth and development.

Is One a Better Source of Healthy Fats Like Omega-3s?

When it comes to healthy fats in general, sardines come out on top:

  • Sardines, canned in oil: 2.56 grams of unsaturated fat in a 1-ounce serving
  • Anchovies, canned in oil: 1.8 grams of unsaturated fat in a 1-ounce serving

But if you're looking to boost your levels of omega-3 fatty acids—a specific type of healthy unsaturated fat—anchovies are the better choice. A 1-ounce serving contains 594 milligrams of omega-3s, while the same amount of sardines has 278 milligrams.

Consuming more omega-3s and healthy fats in general may benefit multiple different aspects of your health:

  • Heart health: Omega-3s help reduce levels of triglycerides, or fats in the blood; high triglyceride levels are a risk factor for heart disease and stroke. In general, research has shown that eating unsaturated fats in place of saturated fats—the kind found in full-fat dairy, red meat, and tropical oils—reduces your risk of heart disease.
  • Brain health and cognitive function: Some research suggests that insufficient levels of omega-3s may increase the risk of brain health concerns, including Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and depression. Another study found that omega-3 supplements could improve mild cognitive impairment, a condition that causes memory and thinking issues that can develop into dementia.
  • Eye health: In some studies, people who ate fatty fish (and more omega-3s) had a lower risk of age-related macular degeneration, a condition that can blur vision. Similarly, there's evidence that diets higher in omega-3s could reduce the risk of dry eye disease. However, more research is needed.

How Do They Compare for Vitamin and Mineral Content?

Along with protein and healthy fats, sardines and anchovies are packed with essential micronutrients. However, they contain different amounts of these key vitamins and minerals:

  • Vitamin B12: Sardines have about 10 times more vitamin B12 than anchovies. This B vitamin supports nerve cell function, red blood cell formation, metabolism, and the creation of DNA.
  • Vitamin D: One sardine has the vitamin D content of about eight anchovies. Vitamin D helps the body absorb calcium and supports bone maintenance and growth.
  • Iron: As compared to sardines, anchovies contain about 60% more iron. This mineral helps form red blood cells, supports muscle and tissue function, and more.
  • Phosphorus: Sardines are nearly twice as rich in phosphorous than anchovies are. In fact, a 1-ounce serving of sardines contains about 20% of the daily recommended intake for adults. Phosphorus is key in creating structures in the body, including teeth, DNA, and cell membranes.
  • Calcium: As compared to anchovies, sardines are a better source of calcium, a mineral which helps support and maintain bone health.

Comparing Sardines and Anchovies

Nutritional content always varies based on packaging and other factors, but here's how a typical 1-ounce serving of anchovies compares to a 1-ounce serving of sardines:

Sardines, canned in oil Anchovies, canned in oil
Calories 59 60
Protein 6.97 grams (g) 8.10 g
Total fat 3.23 g 2.75 g
Carbohydrates 0 g 0 g
Calcium 108 milligrams (mg) 65.8 mg
Iron 0.828 mg 1.31 mg
Magnesium 11.1 mg 19.6 mg
Phosphorus 139 mg 71.4 mg
Potassium 113 mg 154 mg
Selenium 14.9 micrograms (mcg) 19.3 mcg
Sodium 87 mg 1,040 mg
Zinc 0.371 mg 0.692 mg
Vitamin B12 2.53 mcg 0.249 mcg
Vitamin D 1.36 mcg 0.482 mcg

In addition to their relatively similar nutritional profiles, sardines and anchovies share many other commonalities.

Both are considered forage fish, and they're often eaten by larger fish or marine mammals. Sardines are a bit bigger—they're 4-12 inches while anchovies are usually 7-8 inches—but both species' relative small size and low position on the food chain ensures they have low mercury levels.

Once they're harvested, anchovies and sardines are usually jarred or canned in water or oil to make them shelf stable. One difference is that canned anchovies are often salt-cured—this gives them a pink color and a salty flavor (as well as high amounts of sodium).

What To Know Before Adding These Small Fish to Your Diet

Anchovies and sardines aren't naturally high in sodium (or salt), but jarred or canned versions often have a lot of salt added.

For instance, a 1-ounce serving of anchovies canned in oil contains 1,040 milligrams of sodium, which is 45% of the recommended daily limit for adults.

Diets high in sodium raise your risk of developing high blood pressure, heart diseases, artery diseases, heart attack, and stroke.

When purchasing canned fish, check the nutrition label and try to find a product that has lower amounts of sodium.

Sardines and anchovies also usually contain bones. The canning process makes these bones safe to eat, though young children and people with swallowing concerns may want to avoid them.



Source link