Minnesota budget deal offers $205 million lifeline to HCMC


Gov. Tim Walz and Minnesota lawmakers reached a bipartisan budget agreement late Wednesday that paves the way for the conclusion of the Minnesota Legislature’s session. The deal includes support for a key Minneapolis hospital, cuts to vehicle registration fees and property tax relief for homeowners.

The pact between Gov. Tim Walz and top lawmakers will still need some massaging before bills are ready for final votes, which must take place by midnight on Sunday.

In the final weekend of the legislative session, lawmakers still need to resolve several major budget items. One of these items includes hundreds of millions of dollars in funding for HCMC, the state’s busiest Level 1 trauma center.

HCMC has struggled with budget constraints for years and is expected to incur $1.7 billion in losses over the next decade due to rising uninsured rates and changes to federal policy, including Medicaid cuts.

Operated by Hennepin Healthcare, the safety-net hospital serves more low-income and uninsured patients than any other facility in Minnesota.

The Minnesota Nurses Association hailed the new state funding agreement as a victory for both the hospital and its patients.

“When nurses leave the bedside, patients lose access. This keeps care in place for Minnesotans who depend on this hospital,” said Janell Johnson Thiele, RN and HCMC Tri-Chair. “We must continue to seek permanent funding solutions.”

DFL Senate Majority Leader Erin Murphy said the caucus supported healthcare throughout the session, calling the negotiations “hard-fought.”

Immediate state support

Lawmakers are finalizing the agreement’s details, but they plan to direct $205 million from the state's general fund to stabilize HCMC for this year.

Rep. Esther Agbaje, DFL-Minneapolis and co-lead author of the bill, said in an interview with MPR News that there was broad consensus on the importance of the hospital.

“We must save it,” Agbaje said. “While it took some time to get people to understand the gravity of the situation and understand the meaningfulness of our response, I'm glad we got there.”

The deal also allocates $500 million over five years for healthcare systems and hospitals at risk of closure. An additional $30 million will be set aside for distressed hospitals across Minnesota. During a press conference, Agbaje said that healthcare facilities must meet certain criteria to receive state funding, including the amount of medical assistance provided as well as the amount spent on uncompensated care for patients who are unable to pay for services.

HCMC accounts for 20 percent of all uncompensated care in Minnesota, according to Hennepin Healthcare. Agbaje said that while the $30 million is insufficient, she assured that lawmakers are committed to addressing hospital funding needs

“We want to come back in future legislatures to make sure that we're providing the resources that hospitals, not only HCMC, need to really survive in this coming era,” she said.

Hennepin Healthcare Board Chair Jeffrey Lunde said in a statement that the agreement represents progress in stabilizing the hospital and safeguarding access to services for years to come.

Lawmakers emphasize oversight

Leaders from both political parties have agreed to establish a working group focused on financial oversight and creating a new governance structure for HCMC. Agbaje noted that the county board will transition to a professional board tasked with overseeing the hospital. Board members will have expertise in finance, public health and administration, all critical for managing a hospital she said.

Agbaje also said that hospitals will need to fulfill reporting requirements for the public funds they seek, and lawmakers will receive updates on how the initial $205 million is spent. At the same time, a legislative committee will determine whether to distribute additional funds from reserves in upcoming years.

On Wednesday evening, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison held a public forum about the future of HCMC. Community members in attendance asked about the oversight measures in place.

"It's not that the hospital needs oversight because they haven't done what their job is; they have," Ellison said. "When you get more resources, you're going to get more oversight. That's totally appropriate.”

Ballpark tax debate ends

Bipartisan proposals to support HCMC included increasing Hennepin County sales tax revenue to fund the hospital. One plan suggested repurposing the county’s existing 0.15 percent sales tax, which is used to pay off bonds for Target Field’s construction, into a 1 percent sales tax. The change could have generated about $340 million annually for HCMC, with the remaining funds allocated for ballpark-related investments.

Hennepin County requires legislative approval to reallocate these funds as a healthcare tax to cover ongoing expenses. Instead, Wednesday’s agreement uses money from the state’s general fund.

Agbaje said that legislators were reluctant to use tax dollars for the hospital. GOP House Speaker Lisa Demuth added that the agreement was reached without extending the Hennepin County ballpark tax or increasing Minnesotans taxes.

“Our caucus has fought all session long for car tab relief, property tax cuts, and meaningful anti-fraud measures,” Demuth said. “This budget delivers that, along with help for rural and critical access hospitals across the state and relief for our counties.”

Walz described the HCMC agreement as a “historic, bipartisan investment”. “I'm proud of what we did, but I want to be very cautious on this,” he said. “This is only the beginning of the health and the hospital crisis across the country.”

Lawmakers anticipate that healthcare and hospitals will be a major focus during the 2027 legislative session. But attention now turns to finalizing the bill language related to Wednesday night’s budget deal and to advance the measures through both chambers before the session ends on May 18.

MPR News political correspondent Dana Ferguson contributed to this story.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Lululemon clothing is being investigated for PFAS.Credit: winhorse / Getty Images
Lululemon clothing is being investigated for PFAS.
Credit: winhorse / Getty Images
  • The Texas attorney general is investigating whether Lululemon clothing contains PFAS, commonly known as “forever chemicals.”
  • PFAS are widely used for stain- and water-resistant products, but their long-term health effects are still not fully understood.
  • Experts say exposure from clothing is likely low, but there are some signs to tell if your clothes contain PFAS.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced Monday that his office is launching an investigation into whether clothing from the athleisure brand Lululemon contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), long-lasting compounds commonly referred to as “forever chemicals.” The investigation has thrust these chemicals—linked to a range of negative health outcomes and used in a variety of products—into the spotlight. Here’s what to know about the Lululemon probe, PFAS, and what it could mean for your health if these compounds are lurking in your clothing.

What's the Investigation About, Exactly?

According to a press release from Paxton’s office, the investigation will examine whether Lululemon’s clothing contains PFAS "that their health-conscious customers would not expect based on the brand’s marketing.” The office “will also review the company’s Restricted Substances List, testing protocols, and supply chain practices to determine whether Lululemon’s products comply with its stated safety standards,” the release continued.

Per the release, the allegations stem from "emerging research and consumer concerns."

Lululemon, meanwhile, denied using PFAS in its apparel, which includes leggings, workout tops, and casual athleisure wear. In an email to Health, a company spokesperson said: 

"The company phased out the substance in FY23, which had been used in durable water repellent products, a small percentage of our assortment. The health and safety of our guests is paramount, and our products meet or exceed global regulatory, safety, and quality standards. We require all our vendors to regularly conduct testing for restricted substances, including PFAS, by credible third-party agencies to confirm ongoing compliance.”

What Are PFAS?

PFAS is an umbrella term for a class of chemical compounds used in a wide range of everyday products, including furniture, carpets, paint, food packaging, and clothing. They’re often added to fabrics for their stain-resistant or water-repellant properties, said Alex LeBeau, Ph.D., MPH, CIH, a toxicologist, certified industrial hygienist, and owner of Exposure Consulting in Orlando, Florida.

These compounds—which number in the thousands—have been dubbed “forever chemicals” because they don’t break down easily and have been discovered in soil, air, water, and in animals. They’ve been found in humans, too. Nearly everyone in the U.S. has measurable amounts of PFAS in their blood, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

How Harmful Are PFAS?

Scientists still don’t fully know how PFAS affect human health. The chemicals can be particularly challenging to study because the category includes thousands of compounds, products contain varying levels, and exposure can come from many sources.

Two of the most widely studied PFAS—PFOS and PFOA—were phased out in the U.S. in the 2010s, LeBeau said. Those long-chain PFAS, which tend to accumulate in the body and stick around for longer, were largely replaced with short-chain alternatives, which are thought to be less bioaccumulative but may still raise health concerns.

Much of the research into PFAS has focused on what happens when people ingest them through water or food. A 2025 study found a link between PFAS in drinking water and increased incidence of digestive, endocrine, respiratory, and oral cancers. Still, LeBeau said that overall, “the health impacts are still up for debate in the scientific community.” Many human studies have produced mixed results, and much of the existing research has been conducted in animals.  

While it’s possible for PFAS to be absorbed through the skin from clothing, LeBeau said it’s not considered as concerning as ingesting the chemicals. “Dermal PFAS uptake does not appear to be a concerning PFAS exposure route into the body,” he said. “Limited animal studies have suggested that PFAS may permeate the skin, but skin impact may also depend on the PFAS chemical form.”

How to Know If Your Clothing Contains PFAS

There is no federal law requiring clothing manufacturers to stop using PFAS or disclose whether their products contain them. Although, some states have banned their use in apparel and other products, and many well-known brands have said they are voluntarily phasing them out—including Lululemon. 

While LeBeau said people should be most concerned about PFAS in their food and water, it's understandable to want to avoid potentially harmful chemicals altogether. Unfortunately, it's not always easy to tell whether clothing contains PFAS—but there are a few clues.

One is if a garment is labeled as being made with GORE-TEX or Teflon, both of which are PFAS-based materials. Clothing marketed as moisture-wicking, waterproof or water-repellant, or stain-resistant is also more likely to contain PFAS. It’s also a good sign if a brand explicitly labels a product or line as PFAS-free and that claim has been verified through third-party testing.



Source link