The World’s Smallest Wellness Wearable, Smart Earrings, Just Launched on Kickstarter


Wearables like smartwatches and smart rings can be bulky, making them difficult to wear 24/7. That’s a gap that smart earring creator Lumia Health hopes to fill with the Lumia 2 device, which was originally created in collaboration with researchers at Johns Hopkins, Duke and Harvard to assist patients with chronic blood flow disorders.

The company calls the Lumia 2 smart earrings the world’s smallest wellness wearable. It’s an earring back-like device about the size of a coffee bean that houses a second-generation PreciseLight sensor, processors, a battery and additional health sensors.

On Tuesday, the Lumia 2 earrings launched on Kickstarter, earning more than $800,000, which is over 80 times the original goal of $10,000.

What Lumia 2 tracks

Weighing less than 1 gram and being five times smaller than AirPods, miniaturized biosensing technology allows the Lumia 2 smart earrings to track over 20 health metrics, including sleep, activity (steps, calories and active minutes), readiness, the menstrual cycle, temperature, heart rate and heart rate variability, blood oxygen (SpO2) and blood flow. The latter is what inspired the creation of Lumia Health.

“Six years ago, my father fell and broke six ribs because not enough blood flow was getting to his head,” Daniel Lee, co-founder and CEO of Lumia Health, said in a Kickstarter video. “We should be able to measure blood flow in real time, so we can avoid some of these catastrophic injuries.”

Event Tagging is also available, so you can log your activities and behaviors, such as caffeine intake, meditation and travel. 

All of this will be available in the accompanying app, which is iOS– and Android-compatible with an iPhone SE (second generation) or later, iOS 17 or later and Android 11 or later, with Bluetooth Low Energy 5.0 or later.

Silver Lumia 2 hoop earrings in a person's hear with their hair pulled back.

Track sleep, blood flow, heart rate, energy and more with Lumia 2.

Lumia

Different ways to wear it, one significant location

With its three designs — the stud, huggie hoops and ear cuffs for those without pierced ears — Lumia 2 places its sensors directly behind your ear. Compared with wrist- and finger-based wearable devices, this location near the heart and ear’s shallow blood vessels provides, according to Lumia Health, a stronger signal that is less affected by movement, enabling continuous, uninterrupted data.

While it was designed to match most looks in gold, silver and titanium finishes, you can also use Lumia 2’s SwitchBack technology to attach the device to your already-existing collection of push-back earrings. 

Battery life that never ends

Unlike other wearables that require removal for charging, the Lumia 2 uses swappable batteries that each last seven days. Once your battery needs charging, you simply remove it, swap in the fully charged backup and then place your in-need-of-charging battery into the charger so it’s ready seven days later. 

Using a swappable battery supports the company’s claim that the Lumia 2 can collect continuous data, especially when you’re sleeping, since most people charge their devices during this time. 

Every 3 minutes, the Lumia 2 collects blood flow and heart rate metrics, including HRV. You can also enable Live Mode to capture data once per second for a fixed period, such as when you’re exercising or want immediate feedback. 

There are plans to create a configurable data capture rate that lets you select a higher sampling frequency, such as once per minute, but this will sacrifice battery life.

Silver Lumia 2 smart earrings with a swappable battery.

With swappable batteries, you never have to wait for the Lumia 2 to charge.

Lumia

Privacy

Data collected by Lumia 2 is encrypted, anonymized and access-controlled, according to the company, which states in its Kickstarter FAQs that it shares your data only with third-party cloud server providers, such as AWS, to help Lumia Health securely store and serve you your data. 

Or, if you opt in to the Data From the People, For the People program, you would authorize your data to be added to a de-identified, aggregated pool of open-source data provided to top researchers. Lumia Health vets these research partners to ensure they’re working in the best interest of both public health and the health conditions the company aims to serve.

When asked about how research partners are vetted, a Lumia Health representative didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Note that Lumia 2 is not an FDA-cleared medical device, meaning it’s not designed to diagnose or treat any health condition.

Cost and membership

Lumia 2’s base price is $249, while hoops, cuffs and studs will cost extra. All finishes — gold, silver and titanium — are priced equally. 

However, a membership is required. The monthly fee is $20, while the one-year plan is $14 per month, and the two-year plan is $10 per month. With all three, you get app insights, unlimited cloud storage and software updates.

Currently, the most affordable Kickstarter reward is priced at $279 and includes a smart earring back, a titanium cuff, two titanium studs, two batteries and a six-month membership plan. Pricier plans offer different designs, finishes and plans.

Shipping to the US is free, while shipping to Canada (except Québec) is about $20. 

A silver Lumia 2 hoop earring on a marble countertop.

A membership is required to access Lumia 2’s insights through its app.

Lumia

The Lumia timeline

Lumia Health was founded in early 2020, and yes, there was once a Lumia 1, released in February 2025. One month later, in March, the concepting for Lumia 2 began, and it was officially announced in November. 

Now that the Lumia Kickstarter has begun, the device’s beta launch is scheduled for September, with shipments expected in December. Beta access was limited to 500 backers and has already sold out.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


I was watching a Ford truck commercial—you know, the kind that airs during Monday Night Football—and the theme was how good solid blue-collar Americans who own small welding businesses and wear plaid flannel shirts always give 100%. Cue Bob Seger, “Like a Rock.”

Oh wait, that was Chevy. But you get the idea.

Anyway, Ford has obviously gone soft. Anyone who follows sports or business figures on social media knows that giving 100% is for losers. Winners give 110% every day. I know this from watching Shark Tank and that Michael Jordan documentary.

This idea is not limited to athletes and self-made billionaires. There’s another group that really likes to say that you need to exert the maximum possible effort, stretching yourself to the limit, every time, all the time.

The 110% mentality in law practice

Lawyers, of course. Especially in the BigLaw world. It’s a standard part of the culture.

Just ask that prominent “law-bro” recruiter who’s always giving cringey advice. Or that firm that billed a bazillion hours on the Twitter lawsuit.

I chalk up this 110% rhetoric mainly to marketing. It’s the image law firms want to sell to their clients, and also to their associates. They want clients to think they go all out, all the time, and they want associates to feel guilty when they don’t bill as many hours as humanly possible.

I’ve always been kind of skeptical about this idea. For starters, I just don’t think it’s realistic to demand maximum effort, 25 billable hours a day, for days on end. Anybody who has worked in a law firm knows this just doesn’t really happen.

I mean, we’re talking about practice. Not a game . . .

But lately I’ve been thinking about a different objection to the “always be grinding” mentality in law firm culture: does it actually result in better performance?

I hypothesize that lawyers and other professionals might actually perform at a higher level if they ditch the 110% approach.

To test this hypothesis, I did an experiment.

My scientific experiment

I went to the park to test how far I could kick a soccer ball. But here’s the key: I did it two ways.

First, I thought about kicking the ball as hard as I possibly could.

Second, I relaxed and thought about kicking the ball hard, but not as hard as I could.

To keep it scientific, I repeated the experiment multiple times. I mean, like at least three times.

I don’t even need to tell you what happened.

Yes, of course, I got more distance with the second approach. Maybe not every single time, but definitely most of the time.

The same experiment works with driving a golf ball off the tee. If you play golf at all, you already know this. When you walk up to the tee box thinking “I’m going to smack the crap out of this ball,” the result is almost always bad. Unless you are John Daly. But I digress.

The point is that the experiment illustrates a principle well known to sports psychologists, the “85 Percent Rule.”

The 85 Percent Rule

Here’s what people who coach elite athletes already know. Let’s say you tell a world-class sprinter to run the 100-meter dash at 85% effort. Often that results in a faster time than trying to run at 100% effort.

Now, of course, this isn’t a highly scientific theory, and you can quibble with the details. But that’s not the point.

The point is that athletes often get better results when they don’t try as hard as they possibly can.

What gives? Why is that?

The theory is that when elite athletes concentrate on exerting the maximum possible effort, they tense up, and their performance suffers. When they think about giving 85%, they relax and perform better.

Could the same principle hold true for lawyers, and other professionals?

Anecdotal evidence and my own personal experience suggest the answer may be yes.

Do the most effective lawyers give 110 percent?

Have you ever watched a lawyer in the courtroom who just seems to be trying too hard? It can be hard to watch. They’re going all out to try to persuade the judge or jury to go their way, but instead they just sound desperate, or overly aggressive.

And don’t get me started on law firms over-working a file.

On the other hand, think about the most persuasive lawyers you have seen in action. Did they seem like they were straining to exert themselves as much as humanly possible? Or did they seem relaxed and confident?

You don’t even have to say anything, I already know what the best lawyers are like.

Like a rock.

______________________

Zach Wolfe (zach@zachwolfelaw.com) is a Texas trial lawyer who handles non-compete and trade secret litigation at Zach Wolfe Law Firm (zachwolfelaw.com). Thomson Reuters has named him a Texas Super Lawyer® for Business Litigation every year since 2020.

These are his opinions, not the opinions of his firm or clients, so don’t cite part of this post against him in an actual case. Every case is different, so don’t rely on this post as legal advice for your case.



Source link