DNR identifies starting location of Flanders Fire



A man looks at fire damage

Efforts to combat a wildfire in northern Crow Wing County are beginning to wind down as officials try to pinpoint what caused the massive blaze that burned more than 1,600 acres.

On Tuesday, fire crews continued working to put out remaining hot spots, and residents who live in the evacuation zone were able to return to their homes.

Officials with the Minnesota Incident Command System team said the Flanders fire is 60 percent contained as of Tuesday, but Crow Wing County Sheriff Eric Klang is more optimistic than that.

“There's absolutely no fire,” Klang said Tuesday morning from the command center in Crosslake. “There's smoke in some stumps and stuff like that that are kind of just smoldering, but for the most part it looks good. I've even seen some green growth popping through that blackness.”

Damage from a wildfire-1
Damage from the Flanders Fire in Crow Wing County on May 19.
Kirsti Marohn | MPR News

He said the Incident Management Team is preparing to transfer firefighting duties back to local authorities.

The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is leading the investigation into what caused the Flanders Fire, which started Saturday morning and quickly erupted due to dry, windy conditions.

The DNR said on Tuesday that it has located the origin of the fire near the north shore of Flanders Lake in Mission Township, southeast of Crosslake.

The agency said it has identified people of interest in connection with the fire. They could face criminal charges.

Investigators are asking people who live in the area and have trail cameras, doorbell cameras or other information to contact the DNR.

Klang said he believes the source may have been a campfire started near the lake, either Saturday or the night before.

"It looks to me that they probably couldn't be on the lake because it was too windy, so they kind of moved into the woods to get away from that wind,” Klang said. “And then at some point, that started.”

Damage from a fire-6
Damage from the Flanders Fire along Crow Wing County Road 11 pictured on May 19.
Kirsti Marohn | MPR News

The fire didn't destroy any homes, but a few sustained damage. It did burn some secondary buildings, such as garden sheds.

It tore through acres of forest, some owned by Crow Wing County or the state of Minnesota. Rows of charred trees and blackened ground are visible from County Road 11.

At one spot deep in the woods, some people had been camping when the fire broke out. They apparently left in a hurry, abandoning camping gear and an all-terrain vehicle.

"They didn't have time to take anything, because that fire was moving that fast with that amount of intensity,” Klang said.

Homeowners return

Property owners in the evacuation zones were officially allowed to return to their homes on Tuesday, although many had already gone back.

Larry Roberts has owned a cattle ranch in Crosby for nearly 40 years. On Saturday, he was planting corn up the road from the ranch when he smelled something burning, then heard fire trucks.

"I was worried,” Roberts said. “You don't know what's going on or how bad it is. All you see was smoke and flames."

Larry Roberts stands next to his house in Crosby
Larry Roberts stands next to his house in Crosby on May 19, 2026. The Flanders Fire burned to the edge of his driveway and melted the siding on his house. Roberts' herd of 75 cattle survived.
Kirsti Marohn | MPR News

Firefighters told Roberts and his partner, Linda Hill, to leave their home. They drove down the road to watch the fire from a safe distance.

The fire roared right up to the edge of their driveway, close enough to melt the siding on the garage.

Fire crews sprayed the house to keep it from burning. It survived, along with his herd of 75 cattle.

With the surrounding woods now blackened, Roberts’ farm looks much different.

"That's the hardest part,” he said. “You can rebuild a house, but you can't put trees back."

Melanie Simonson had to flee her home on Loon Lake in Mission Township on Saturday, as the fire grew closer. She was relieved when her partner, Ty Nyberg, called her on Sunday to tell her the house was still standing.

"I didn't know what to expect. I was expecting the worst,” Simonson said.

Nyberg told her the fire “didn’t touch a thing of ours.” Although the surrounding woods were burned, the house, garden and nearby fuel tank were undamaged. Simonson can’t believe they were so fortunate.

“I started to cry so hard,” she said.

Damage from a fire-4
Damage from the Flanders Fire along Crow Wing County Road 11 pictured on May 19.
Kirsti Marohn | MPR News



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Body and face lotions are counted as liquids by the TSA. This also includes most other variants of lotions, like body creams, gels, pastes, butter, and similar alternatives. Even thicker body ointments are considered liquid. If you can smear it, it’s considered liquid.

When packed in hand luggage (carry-on or personal item), they’re limited to 3.4 oz (100 ml) bottles or smaller. You also have to put them in your quart-size bag together with your other toiletries.

Only medically-prescribed lotions are allowed in larger quantities in hand baggage. But you’ll have to show the TSA agent your prescription. Otherwise, they’ll be treated like any other liquid.

It’s also worth noting that half-empty lotion bottles that are over 3.4 oz (100 ml) aren’t allowed. That’s because the TSA agent has no way of telling how much lotion is left inside. 

In checked bags, TSA allows lotions in larger quantities. You could even fill your suitcase to the brim with lotions and it would still be allowed. There also aren’t any restrictions on how you should be packing them.

Traveling With Lotions Internationally

Generally, the rules for traveling with lotions are identical across the world. In hand baggage, they’re limited to small 100 ml containers and they aren’t restricted in checked bags.

Only Australia and New Zealand have different rules. Both of these countries have incorporated new 3D CT scanners in their airports, which can safely screen liquids in larger quantities. When you’re flying domestically in Australia or New Zealand, your lotion bottles aren’t restricted to 3.4 oz containers in hand baggage.

How to Pack Lotions in Luggage

To avoid spills in your luggage, here’s how you should be packing lotions in your luggage:

  • Avoid placing the lotion bottle near the edges of your suitcase to avoid punctures and direct hits
  • Always wrap your lotion in soft clothing
  • Tape the lid to the bottle to keep it from accidentally opening
  • Put the lotion bottle in a separate Ziploc bag if packed in checked baggage
  • If in hand luggage, always put it inside your bag of toiletries. Remember to keep it somewhere accessible because you’ll need to take it out when going through security

There are Some Travel-Friendly Alternatives to Lotions

It goes a bit against common sense but there indeed are some “solid” lotion alternatives, which don’t have any packing restrictions. You can find solid stick moisturizers and solid lotion bars if you look around online, sold by Blush and other large brands. These usually need to be applied to wet skin in order for them to work.

Another option is to use moisturizing wipes. Even though they contain a bit of liquid inside, they are considered solid items by the TSA. You won’t have to put them in your toiletry bag when going through security. They’re also super easy to use when you’re on the plane.

Summing Up – Traveling With Lotions

You can fit roughly 6-8x 3.4 oz (100 ml) containers in your 1-quart bag of toiletries. For traveling, it’s usually enough to bring just one small bottle of lotion. But it’s hard to find a small lotion bottle. So the best thing that you can do is to transfer it from a larger bottle to a smaller one.

If you need to bring larger quantities of lotion, your only option is to pack it in your checked baggage or buy it at your destination.



Source link